On Tue, 2006-06-13 at 16:46 -0500, Steve Wise wrote:
On Tue, 2006-06-13 at 14:36 -0700, Sean Hefty wrote:
Er...no. It will lose this event. Depending on the event...the carnage
varies. We'll take a look at this.
This behavior is consistent with the Infiniband CM (see
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2006-06-13 at 16:46 -0500, Steve Wise wrote:
On Tue, 2006-06-13 at 14:36 -0700, Sean Hefty wrote:
Er...no. It will lose this event. Depending on the event...the
carnage varies. We'll take a look at this.
This behavior is consistent with the Infiniband CM
Er...no. It will lose this event. Depending on the event...the carnage
varies. We'll take a look at this.
This behavior is consistent with the Infiniband CM (see
drivers/infiniband/core/cm.c function cm_recv_handler()). But I think
we should at least log an error because a lost event will
On Tue, 2006-06-13 at 14:36 -0700, Sean Hefty wrote:
Er...no. It will lose this event. Depending on the event...the carnage
varies. We'll take a look at this.
This behavior is consistent with the Infiniband CM (see
drivers/infiniband/core/cm.c function cm_recv_handler()). But I think
