On 1 Oct 2018, at 17:12, David Ahern wrote:
> On 10/1/18 4:29 AM, Eelco Chaudron wrote:
Hi Stephen, anything else required for this patch to be accepted?
FYI the kernel side of this patch has been excepted on net-next.
Cheers,
Eelco
>>>
>>> David Ahern
On 10/1/18 4:29 AM, Eelco Chaudron wrote:
>>> Hi Stephen, anything else required for this patch to be accepted?
>>>
>>> FYI the kernel side of this patch has been excepted on net-next.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>> Eelco
>>
>> David Ahern handles net-next see patchwork
>>
On 1 Oct 2018, at 11:10, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Mon, 01 Oct 2018 09:08:32 +0200
> "Eelco Chaudron" wrote:
>
>> On 10 Aug 2018, at 16:48, Eelco Chaudron wrote:
>>
>>> On 10 Aug 2018, at 16:44, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
>>>
On Fri, 10 Aug 2018 07:59:30 -0400
Eelco Chaudron
On Mon, 01 Oct 2018 09:08:32 +0200
"Eelco Chaudron" wrote:
> On 10 Aug 2018, at 16:48, Eelco Chaudron wrote:
>
> > On 10 Aug 2018, at 16:44, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> >
> >> On Fri, 10 Aug 2018 07:59:30 -0400
> >> Eelco Chaudron wrote:
> >>
> >>> + if (bs.bytes >= bs_hw.bytes &&
On 10 Aug 2018, at 16:48, Eelco Chaudron wrote:
On 10 Aug 2018, at 16:44, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
On Fri, 10 Aug 2018 07:59:30 -0400
Eelco Chaudron wrote:
+ if (bs.bytes >= bs_hw.bytes && bs.packets >= bs_hw.packets) {
+ print_string(PRINT_FP, NULL,
On 10 Aug 2018, at 16:44, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Fri, 10 Aug 2018 07:59:30 -0400
> Eelco Chaudron wrote:
>
>> +if (bs.bytes >= bs_hw.bytes && bs.packets >= bs_hw.packets) {
>> +print_string(PRINT_FP, NULL, "%s", _SL_);
>> +
On Fri, 10 Aug 2018 07:59:30 -0400
Eelco Chaudron wrote:
> + if (bs.bytes >= bs_hw.bytes && bs.packets >= bs_hw.packets) {
> + print_string(PRINT_FP, NULL, "%s", _SL_);
> + print_string(PRINT_FP, NULL, "%s", prefix);
> +
