Re: [oss-drivers] Re: [PATCH net-next 0/7] nfp: extend match and action for flower offload

2017-10-09 Thread Simon Horman
On Mon, Oct 09, 2017 at 08:45:41AM -0700, Tom Herbert wrote: > On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 1:05 AM, Simon Horman > wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 06, 2017 at 08:34:59AM -0700, Tom Herbert wrote: > >> Simon, > >> > >> Maybe a bit off topic, but I had the impression netronome would

Re: [PATCH net-next 0/7] nfp: extend match and action for flower offload

2017-10-09 Thread Tom Herbert
On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 1:05 AM, Simon Horman wrote: > On Fri, Oct 06, 2017 at 08:34:59AM -0700, Tom Herbert wrote: >> Simon, >> >> Maybe a bit off topic, but I had the impression netronome would >> support BPF so that filters could be programmed for arbitrary >>

Re: [PATCH net-next 0/7] nfp: extend match and action for flower offload

2017-10-09 Thread Simon Horman
On Fri, Oct 06, 2017 at 08:34:59AM -0700, Tom Herbert wrote: > Simon, > > Maybe a bit off topic, but I had the impression netronome would > support BPF so that filters could be programmed for arbitrary > protocols and fields. Is that true? If so, what is the relationship > between that

Re: [PATCH net-next 0/7] nfp: extend match and action for flower offload

2017-10-06 Thread David Miller
From: Simon Horman Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2017 10:21:19 +0200 > Pieter says: > > This series extends flower offload match and action capabilities. It > specifically adds offload capabilities for matching on MPLS, TTL, TOS > and flow label. Furthermore offload capabilities

Re: [PATCH net-next 0/7] nfp: extend match and action for flower offload

2017-10-06 Thread Tom Herbert
Simon, Maybe a bit off topic, but I had the impression netronome would support BPF so that filters could be programmed for arbitrary protocols and fields. Is that true? If so, what is the relationship between that functionality and these patches? Thanks, Tom On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 1:21 AM,