On Mon, Oct 09, 2017 at 08:45:41AM -0700, Tom Herbert wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 1:05 AM, Simon Horman
> wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 06, 2017 at 08:34:59AM -0700, Tom Herbert wrote:
> >> Simon,
> >>
> >> Maybe a bit off topic, but I had the impression netronome would
On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 1:05 AM, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 06, 2017 at 08:34:59AM -0700, Tom Herbert wrote:
>> Simon,
>>
>> Maybe a bit off topic, but I had the impression netronome would
>> support BPF so that filters could be programmed for arbitrary
>>
On Fri, Oct 06, 2017 at 08:34:59AM -0700, Tom Herbert wrote:
> Simon,
>
> Maybe a bit off topic, but I had the impression netronome would
> support BPF so that filters could be programmed for arbitrary
> protocols and fields. Is that true? If so, what is the relationship
> between that
From: Simon Horman
Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2017 10:21:19 +0200
> Pieter says:
>
> This series extends flower offload match and action capabilities. It
> specifically adds offload capabilities for matching on MPLS, TTL, TOS
> and flow label. Furthermore offload capabilities
Simon,
Maybe a bit off topic, but I had the impression netronome would
support BPF so that filters could be programmed for arbitrary
protocols and fields. Is that true? If so, what is the relationship
between that functionality and these patches?
Thanks,
Tom
On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 1:21 AM,