RE: [PATCH net-next 9/9] ipvlan: introduce individual MAC addresses

emloft.net>; Kirsher, > Jeffrey T <jeffrey.t.kirs...@intel.com>; Duyck, Alexander H > <alexander.h.du...@intel.com>; Grandhi, Sainath > <sainath.gran...@intel.com>; Mahesh Bandewar <mahe...@google.com> > Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 9/9] ipvlan: introduce individual MAC

Re: [PATCH net-next 9/9] ipvlan: introduce individual MAC addresses

hat.com>; netdev@vger.kernel.org; David S > > . > > Miller <da...@davemloft.net>; Kirsher, Jeffrey T > > <jeffrey.t.kirs...@intel.com>; Duyck, Alexander H > > <alexander.h.du...@intel.com>; Grandhi, Sainath > > <sainath.gran...@intel.com&g

RE: [PATCH net-next 9/9] ipvlan: introduce individual MAC addresses

avemloft.net>; Kirsher, Jeffrey T > <jeffrey.t.kirs...@intel.com>; Duyck, Alexander H > <alexander.h.du...@intel.com>; Grandhi, Sainath > <sainath.gran...@intel.com>; Mahesh Bandewar <mahe...@google.com> > Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 9/9] ipvlan: introduce individual MAC

Re: [PATCH net-next 9/9] ipvlan: introduce individual MAC addresses

On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 9:43 AM, Jiri Benc wrote: > On Thu, 4 May 2017 09:37:00 +, Chiappero, Marco wrote: >> This looks conceptually wrong. Yes, ipvlan works at L3 (which is an >> implementation detail anyway), but slaves are Ethernet interfaces and >> should behave as much

Re: [PATCH net-next 9/9] ipvlan: introduce individual MAC addresses

ath.gran...@intel.com>; Mahesh Bandewar <mahe...@google.com> >> Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 9/9] ipvlan: introduce individual MAC addresses >> >> On Tue, 2017-05-02 at 15:08 +, Chiappero, Marco wrote: >> > > -Original Message- >> > > F

Re: [PATCH net-next 9/9] ipvlan: introduce individual MAC addresses

On Thu, 4 May 2017 09:37:00 +, Chiappero, Marco wrote: > This looks conceptually wrong. Yes, ipvlan works at L3 (which is an > implementation detail anyway), but slaves are Ethernet interfaces and > should behave as much as possible as such regardless, with an > individual MAC address

RE: [PATCH net-next 9/9] ipvlan: introduce individual MAC addresses

...@davemloft.net>; Kirsher, Jeffrey T > <jeffrey.t.kirs...@intel.com>; Duyck, Alexander H > <alexander.h.du...@intel.com>; Grandhi, Sainath > <sainath.gran...@intel.com>; Mahesh Bandewar <mahe...@google.com> > Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 9/9] ipvlan: introdu

Re: [PATCH net-next 9/9] ipvlan: introduce individual MAC addresses

On Tue, 2017-05-02 at 15:08 +, Chiappero, Marco wrote: > > -Original Message- > > From: Dan Williams [mailto:d...@redhat.com] > > On Thu, 2017-04-27 at 11:20 -0500, Dan Williams wrote: > > > On Thu, 2017-04-27 at 15:51 +0100, Marco Chiappero wrote: > > > > Currently all the slave

RE: [PATCH net-next 9/9] ipvlan: introduce individual MAC addresses

> -Original Message- > From: Dan Williams [mailto:d...@redhat.com] > On Thu, 2017-04-27 at 11:20 -0500, Dan Williams wrote: > > On Thu, 2017-04-27 at 15:51 +0100, Marco Chiappero wrote: > > > Currently all the slave devices belonging to the same port inherit > > > their MAC address from

Re: [PATCH net-next 9/9] ipvlan: introduce individual MAC addresses

Hi Marco, [auto build test ERROR on net/master] [also build test ERROR on v4.11-rc8] [cannot apply to net-next/master next-20170427] [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help improve the system] url:

Re: [PATCH net-next 9/9] ipvlan: introduce individual MAC addresses

On Thu, 2017-04-27 at 11:20 -0500, Dan Williams wrote: > On Thu, 2017-04-27 at 15:51 +0100, Marco Chiappero wrote: > > Currently all the slave devices belonging to the same port inherit > > their > > MAC address from its master device. This patch removes this > > limitation > > and allows every

Re: [PATCH net-next 9/9] ipvlan: introduce individual MAC addresses

On Thu, 2017-04-27 at 15:51 +0100, Marco Chiappero wrote: > Currently all the slave devices belonging to the same port inherit > their > MAC address from its master device. This patch removes this > limitation > and allows every slave device to obtain a unique MAC address, by > default > randomly