From: Jiri Pirko
Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2016 08:35:02 +0100
> How do you imagine this mode should looks like? Could you draw me some
> example?
Well, first of all, there is no reason we can't provide a mechanism by
which the driver can request and obtain a FIB dump.
And it can be designed in a way to
Wed, Nov 02, 2016 at 03:35:03PM CET, ro...@cumulusnetworks.com wrote:
>On 11/2/16, 6:48 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>> Wed, Nov 02, 2016 at 02:29:40PM CET, ro...@cumulusnetworks.com wrote:
>>> On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 12:20 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
Wed, Nov 02, 2016 at 03:13:42AM CET, ro...@cumulusnetwo
On 11/2/16, 6:48 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> Wed, Nov 02, 2016 at 02:29:40PM CET, ro...@cumulusnetworks.com wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 12:20 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>>> Wed, Nov 02, 2016 at 03:13:42AM CET, ro...@cumulusnetworks.com wrote:
>> [snip]
>>
I understand..but, if you are adding some
Wed, Nov 02, 2016 at 02:29:40PM CET, ro...@cumulusnetworks.com wrote:
>On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 12:20 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>> Wed, Nov 02, 2016 at 03:13:42AM CET, ro...@cumulusnetworks.com wrote:
>>>
>[snip]
>
>>>I understand..but, if you are adding some core infrastructure for switchdev
>>>..it c
On Wed, Nov 02, 2016 at 06:29:40AM -0700, Roopa Prabhu wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 12:20 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> > Wed, Nov 02, 2016 at 03:13:42AM CET, ro...@cumulusnetworks.com wrote:
> >>
> [snip]
>
> >>I understand..but, if you are adding some core infrastructure for switchdev
> >>..it ca
On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 12:20 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> Wed, Nov 02, 2016 at 03:13:42AM CET, ro...@cumulusnetworks.com wrote:
>>
[snip]
>>I understand..but, if you are adding some core infrastructure for switchdev
>>..it cannot be
>>based on the number of simple use-cases or data you have today.
>>
Tue, Nov 01, 2016 at 04:36:50PM CET, da...@davemloft.net wrote:
>From: Roopa Prabhu
>Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2016 08:14:14 -0700
>
>> On 11/1/16, 7:19 AM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>>> On Tue, 2016-11-01 at 00:57 +0200, Ido Schimmel wrote:
On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 02:24:06PM -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>>>
Wed, Nov 02, 2016 at 03:13:42AM CET, ro...@cumulusnetworks.com wrote:
>On 11/1/16, 10:03 AM, Ido Schimmel wrote:
>> Hi Roopa,
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 01, 2016 at 08:14:14AM -0700, Roopa Prabhu wrote:
>>>
>[snip]
>>> I have the same concern as Eric here.
>>>
>>> I understand why you need it, but can the d
On 11/1/16, 10:03 AM, Ido Schimmel wrote:
> Hi Roopa,
>
> On Tue, Nov 01, 2016 at 08:14:14AM -0700, Roopa Prabhu wrote:
>>
[snip]
>> I have the same concern as Eric here.
>>
>> I understand why you need it, but can the driver request for an initial dump
>> and that
>> dump be made more efficient s
Hi Roopa,
On Tue, Nov 01, 2016 at 08:14:14AM -0700, Roopa Prabhu wrote:
> On 11/1/16, 7:19 AM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > On Tue, 2016-11-01 at 00:57 +0200, Ido Schimmel wrote:
> >> On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 02:24:06PM -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> >>> How well will this work for large FIB tables ?
> >>
On Tue, Nov 01, 2016 at 07:19:59AM -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Tue, 2016-11-01 at 00:57 +0200, Ido Schimmel wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 02:24:06PM -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>
> > > How well will this work for large FIB tables ?
> > >
> > > Holding rtnl while sending thousands of skb w
From: Roopa Prabhu
Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2016 08:14:14 -0700
> On 11/1/16, 7:19 AM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>> On Tue, 2016-11-01 at 00:57 +0200, Ido Schimmel wrote:
>>> On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 02:24:06PM -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote:
How well will this work for large FIB tables ?
Holding rtn
On 11/1/16, 7:19 AM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Tue, 2016-11-01 at 00:57 +0200, Ido Schimmel wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 02:24:06PM -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>>> How well will this work for large FIB tables ?
>>>
>>> Holding rtnl while sending thousands of skb will prevent consumers to
>>> mak
On Tue, 2016-11-01 at 00:57 +0200, Ido Schimmel wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 02:24:06PM -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > How well will this work for large FIB tables ?
> >
> > Holding rtnl while sending thousands of skb will prevent consumers to
> > make progress ?
>
> Can you please clarify w
On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 02:24:06PM -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-10-31 at 23:13 +0200, ido...@idosch.org wrote:
> > From: Ido Schimmel
> >
> > When registering a FIB notifier block we should notify the caller of
> > already existing FIB entries and rules, as it would otherwise have an
On Mon, 2016-10-31 at 23:13 +0200, ido...@idosch.org wrote:
> From: Ido Schimmel
>
> When registering a FIB notifier block we should notify the caller of
> already existing FIB entries and rules, as it would otherwise have an
> incomplete view of the FIB tables. This is especially important for
>
16 matches
Mail list logo
