Re: [PATCH net v4] r8169: Bad implementation of netif_carrier_*

On Thu, 2016-02-11 at 08:27 +0200, Corcodel Marian wrote: > On probe stage what carrier to stop and rest two situation > netif_carrier_* is slow and disturbing autonegociation process. > > Signed-off-by: Corcodel Marian > --- > drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169.c | 3

Re: [PATCH net v4] r8169: Bad implementation of netif_carrier_*

From: Corcodel Marian Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2016 15:40:07 +0200 > How is status with this patch-is accepted or not? > I'm interresed by this patch on order to send another patches wich > depend this. The patch is rejected. It will not be looked at further. It is dead. And

Re: [PATCH net v4] r8169: Bad implementation of netif_carrier_*

From: Corcodel Marian Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2016 08:27:43 +0200 > On probe stage what carrier to stop and rest two situation > netif_carrier_* is slow and disturbing autonegociation process. > > Signed-off-by: Corcodel Marian This doesn't tell us

Re: [PATCH net v4] r8169: Bad implementation of netif_carrier_*

On Thu, 2016-02-11 at 03:39 -0500, David Miller wrote: > From: Corcodel Marian > Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2016 08:27:43 +0200 > > > On probe stage what carrier to stop and rest two situation > > netif_carrier_* is slow and disturbing autonegociation process. > > > >

Re: [PATCH net v4] r8169: Bad implementation of netif_carrier_*

From: Corcodel Marian Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2016 12:52:49 +0200 > On Thu, 2016-02-11 at 03:39 -0500, David Miller wrote: >> From: Corcodel Marian >> Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2016 08:27:43 +0200 >> >> > On probe stage what carrier to stop and rest two

Re: [PATCH net v4] r8169: Bad implementation of netif_carrier_*

On Thu, 2016-02-11 at 06:12 -0500, David Miller wrote: > From: Corcodel Marian > Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2016 12:52:49 +0200 > > > On Thu, 2016-02-11 at 03:39 -0500, David Miller wrote: > >> From: Corcodel Marian > >> Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2016 08:27:43 +0200