David Miller írta:
From: Patrick McHardy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2007 01:25:54 +0100
I'm working on the incremental ruleset changing API BTW :)
One of the changes will be that interface matching is not
a default part of every rule, and without wildcards it will
use the ifindex. But
From: Patrick McHardy
I'm working on the incremental ruleset changing API BTW :)
One of the changes will be that interface matching is not
a default part of every rule, and without wildcards it will
use the ifindex. But since the cost of this feature seems
pretty low, I don't see a
On Wed, 2007-11-21 at 01:25 +0100, Patrick McHardy wrote:
David Miller wrote:
From: Laszlo Attila Toth [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2007 14:52:12 +0100
Jan Engelhardt írta:
On Nov 20 2007 14:14, Laszlo Attila Toth wrote:
This is the 6th version of our interface group patches.
On Nov 20 2007 14:14, Laszlo Attila Toth wrote:
This is the 6th version of our interface group patches.
The interface group value can be used to manage different interfaces
at the same time such as in netfilter/iptables.
I take it you could not use...?
iptables -i iif1 -j dosomething
Jan Engelhardt írta:
On Nov 20 2007 14:14, Laszlo Attila Toth wrote:
This is the 6th version of our interface group patches.
The interface group value can be used to manage different interfaces
at the same time such as in netfilter/iptables.
I take it you could not use...?
iptables
From: Laszlo Attila Toth [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2007 14:52:12 +0100
Jan Engelhardt írta:
On Nov 20 2007 14:14, Laszlo Attila Toth wrote:
This is the 6th version of our interface group patches.
The interface group value can be used to manage different interfaces
at the same
David Miller wrote:
From: Laszlo Attila Toth [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2007 14:52:12 +0100
Jan Engelhardt írta:
On Nov 20 2007 14:14, Laszlo Attila Toth wrote:
This is the 6th version of our interface group patches.
The interface group value can be used to manage different
