Wed, Nov 21, 2018 at 05:59:45AM CET, dsah...@gmail.com wrote:
>On 11/20/18 9:59 PM, Nambiar, Amritha wrote:
>> Oops, submitted the v2 patch for man changes too soon, without seeing
>> this. So, in this case, should I re-submit the iproute2-flower patch
>> that was accepted removing the 'range'
On 11/20/2018 8:59 PM, David Ahern wrote:
> On 11/20/18 9:59 PM, Nambiar, Amritha wrote:
>> Oops, submitted the v2 patch for man changes too soon, without seeing
>> this. So, in this case, should I re-submit the iproute2-flower patch
>> that was accepted removing the 'range' keyword?
>
> I think
On 11/20/18 9:59 PM, Nambiar, Amritha wrote:
> Oops, submitted the v2 patch for man changes too soon, without seeing
> this. So, in this case, should I re-submit the iproute2-flower patch
> that was accepted removing the 'range' keyword?
I think so. Consistency across commands is a good thing.
On 11/20/2018 8:46 PM, David Ahern wrote:
> On 11/20/18 9:44 PM, Nambiar, Amritha wrote:
>> On 11/20/2018 2:56 PM, David Ahern wrote:
>>> On 11/15/18 5:55 PM, Amritha Nambiar wrote:
Add details explaining filtering based on port ranges.
Signed-off-by: Amritha Nambiar
---
On 11/20/18 9:44 PM, Nambiar, Amritha wrote:
> On 11/20/2018 2:56 PM, David Ahern wrote:
>> On 11/15/18 5:55 PM, Amritha Nambiar wrote:
>>> Add details explaining filtering based on port ranges.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Amritha Nambiar
>>> ---
>>> man/man8/tc-flower.8 | 12 ++--
>>> 1
On 11/20/2018 2:56 PM, David Ahern wrote:
> On 11/15/18 5:55 PM, Amritha Nambiar wrote:
>> Add details explaining filtering based on port ranges.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Amritha Nambiar
>> ---
>> man/man8/tc-flower.8 | 12 ++--
>> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>>
On 11/15/18 5:55 PM, Amritha Nambiar wrote:
> Add details explaining filtering based on port ranges.
>
> Signed-off-by: Amritha Nambiar
> ---
> man/man8/tc-flower.8 | 12 ++--
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/man/man8/tc-flower.8
