Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 04:57:18PM CEST, eric.duma...@gmail.com wrote:
>On Wed, 2017-08-16 at 13:06 +0200, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>> Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 12:58:53PM CEST, eric.duma...@gmail.com wrote:
>> >On Wed, 2017-08-16 at 12:53 +0200, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>> >
>> >> rhashtable is unnecesary big hammer
On Wed, 2017-08-16 at 13:06 +0200, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 12:58:53PM CEST, eric.duma...@gmail.com wrote:
> >On Wed, 2017-08-16 at 12:53 +0200, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> >
> >> rhashtable is unnecesary big hammer for this. IDR is nice fit for
> >> this purpose.
> >
> >Obviously IDR does
Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 12:58:53PM CEST, eric.duma...@gmail.com wrote:
>On Wed, 2017-08-16 at 12:53 +0200, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>
>> rhashtable is unnecesary big hammer for this. IDR is nice fit for
>> this purpose.
>
>Obviously IDR does not fit, since you have to change its ABI.
I don't think it is a
On Wed, 2017-08-16 at 12:53 +0200, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> rhashtable is unnecesary big hammer for this. IDR is nice fit for
> this purpose.
Obviously IDR does not fit, since you have to change its ABI.
If rhashtable does not fit this, then I wonder why we spent so many days
of work adding it in
Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 12:37:09PM CEST, eric.duma...@gmail.com wrote:
>On Wed, 2017-08-16 at 04:14 -0400, Chris Mi wrote:
>> IDR uses internally radix tree which uses unsigned long. It doesn't
>> makes sense to have index as signed value.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Chris Mi
>>
On Wed, 2017-08-16 at 04:14 -0400, Chris Mi wrote:
> IDR uses internally radix tree which uses unsigned long. It doesn't
> makes sense to have index as signed value.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Mi
> Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko
> ---
> block/bsg.c