On Sat, 6 May 2006 14:00:58 +0200, Ivo van Doorn wrote:
In rt2x00 the config() handler schedules all configuration changes by using a
workqueue,
this is required since several configuration changes in rt2x00 need sleeping
and for
USB devices all register access requires sleeping. And the
On Wed, 10 May 2006 00:01:16 +0200, Ivo van Doorn wrote:
Basicly the dscape stack is performing active scanning while the device is
down,
but during the active scan it is sending packets out, or at least attempting
to do so.
Besides the question if active scanning is preferred over passive
On Wednesday 10 May 2006 00:36, Michael Wu wrote:
On Tuesday 09 May 2006 18:01, Ivo van Doorn wrote:
A user on the forums Olivier Cornu (added to the CC list) has done some
investigation into the scanning behaviour of the dscape stack.
Basicly the dscape stack is performing active scanning
On Wednesday 10 May 2006 12:42, Jiri Benc wrote:
On Sat, 6 May 2006 14:00:58 +0200, Ivo van Doorn wrote:
In rt2x00 the config() handler schedules all configuration changes by using
a workqueue,
this is required since several configuration changes in rt2x00 need
sleeping and for
USB
On Wed, 10 May 2006 15:37:11 +0200, Ivo van Doorn wrote:
True, I agree here. But when rt2x00 was using the ipw stack a much
requested feature from users was to be able to perform scanning while
interface was down. (The requests did not specify if it they wanted passive
or active scanning)
On Wednesday 10 May 2006 12:52, Jiri Benc wrote:
On Wed, 10 May 2006 00:01:16 +0200, Ivo van Doorn wrote:
Basicly the dscape stack is performing active scanning while the device is
down,
but during the active scan it is sending packets out, or at least
attempting to do so.
Besides the
On Wed, 10 May 2006 15:53:48 +0200, Ivo van Doorn wrote:
I think the problem is what the dscape exactly expects the driver to do when
add_interface() is called by the stack. When that call has finished, does the
stack
expects the radio to be enabled, or should it instruct the driver to enable
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 03:53:48PM +0200, Ivo van Doorn wrote:
I think the problem is what the dscape exactly expects the driver to do when
add_interface() is called by the stack. When that call has finished, does the
stack
expects the radio to be enabled, or should it instruct the driver to
While working on the rt2x00 driver, I keep hitting against some problems with
scanning.
Basicly the dscape stack handles scanning in 2 ways, through the
passive_scan() handler in the ieee80211_hw structure, and by calling
the config() handler in the ieee80211_hw stucture.
The usage of the
On Tuesday 09 May 2006 18:01, Ivo van Doorn wrote:
A user on the forums Olivier Cornu (added to the CC list) has done some
investigation into the scanning behaviour of the dscape stack.
Basicly the dscape stack is performing active scanning while the device is
down, but during the active scan
2006/5/10, Michael Wu [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Tuesday 09 May 2006 18:01, Ivo van Doorn wrote:
A user on the forums Olivier Cornu (added to the CC list) has done some
investigation into the scanning behaviour of the dscape stack.
Basicly the dscape stack is performing active scanning while the
11 matches
Mail list logo
