On 2016-11-28 13:29, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 01:12:07PM +0200, Denys Fedoryshchenko wrote:
On 2016-11-28 13:06, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
>Why does your patch reverts NF_NAT_RANGE_PROTO_RANDOM_FULLY?
Ops, sorry i just did mistake with files, actually it is in reverse (
On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 01:12:07PM +0200, Denys Fedoryshchenko wrote:
> On 2016-11-28 13:06, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> >Why does your patch reverts NF_NAT_RANGE_PROTO_RANDOM_FULLY?
>
> Ops, sorry i just did mistake with files, actually it is in reverse ( did
> this patch, and it worked properly
On 2016-11-28 13:06, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 12:45:59PM +0200, Denys Fedoryshchenko wrote:
Hello,
I noticed that if i specify -j SNAT with options --random
--random-fully
still it keeps persistence for source IP.
So you specify both?
Actually truly random src ip
On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 12:45:59PM +0200, Denys Fedoryshchenko wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I noticed that if i specify -j SNAT with options --random --random-fully
> still it keeps persistence for source IP.
So you specify both?
> Actually truly random src ip required in some scenarios like links
