Re: net-2.6.24 rebased...

2007-10-10 Thread Oliver Hartkopp
David Miller wrote: From: Urs Thuermann [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 09 Oct 2007 23:13:42 +0200 Last week I have sent another version of our patch series for PF_CAN. The changes after the last review feedback were only cosmetics. Do you have any plans with that code for this or the next

Re: net-2.6.24 rebased...

2007-10-09 Thread Urs Thuermann
Hallo Dave, 9.1MB, 739 changesets, keep those patches flowing! Last week I have sent another version of our patch series for PF_CAN. The changes after the last review feedback were only cosmetics. Do you have any plans with that code for this or the next release? Regards, urs - To unsubscribe

Re: net-2.6.24 rebased...

2007-10-09 Thread David Miller
From: Urs Thuermann [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 09 Oct 2007 23:13:42 +0200 Last week I have sent another version of our patch series for PF_CAN. The changes after the last review feedback were only cosmetics. Do you have any plans with that code for this or the next release? I think PF_CAN will

Re: net-2.6.24 rebased...

2007-09-26 Thread Johannes Berg
On Tue, 2007-09-25 at 23:33 -0700, David Miller wrote: http://vger.kernel.org/~davem/0433-Z1211-Fix-TX-status-reports.patch What probably needs to happen is some other changes that were in z1211 need to go into the non-mac80211 driver and then this patch applies correctly. I tried

Re: net-2.6.24 rebased...

2007-09-26 Thread John W. Linville
On Tue, Sep 25, 2007 at 11:33:44PM -0700, David Miller wrote: John, one patch didn't go in cleanly after I removed the Z1211 driver. I put it here for your consideration so it doesn't get lost: http://vger.kernel.org/~davem/0433-Z1211-Fix-TX-status-reports.patch What probably

Re: net-2.6.24 rebased...

2007-09-26 Thread David Miller
From: John W. Linville [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 08:46:49 -0400 On Tue, Sep 25, 2007 at 11:33:44PM -0700, David Miller wrote: John, one patch didn't go in cleanly after I removed the Z1211 driver. I put it here for your consideration so it doesn't get lost:

Re: net-2.6.24 rebased

2007-08-31 Thread John W. Linville
On Thu, Aug 30, 2007 at 10:21:29PM -0700, David Miller wrote: From: Johannes Berg [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 13:58:12 +0200 Huh? I'm fairly sure I sent a patch to remove it from that driver, no idea where it got lost. FWIW, you can simply delete the |

Re: net-2.6.24 rebased

2007-08-31 Thread David Miller
From: John W. Linville [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 09:44:32 -0400 Sorry, I sent the patch through Jeff. http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/linville/wireless-2.6/upstream-jgarzik/0010-rtl8187-remove-IEEE80211_HW_DATA_NULLFUNC_ACK.patch But, it sounds like you

Re: net-2.6.24 rebased

2007-08-30 Thread Joe Perches
On Wed, 2007-08-29 at 16:47 -0700, Joe Perches wrote: On Wed, 2007-08-29 at 16:41 -0700, David Miller wrote: From: Joe Perches [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 16:34:00 -0700 On Tue, 2007-08-28 at 17:59 -0700, David Miller wrote: I pushed this fix into net-2.6.24 just now,

Re: net-2.6.24 rebased

2007-08-30 Thread Johannes Berg
On Wed, 2007-08-29 at 23:19 -0700, Joe Perches wrote: CC drivers/net/wireless/rtl8187_dev.o drivers/net/wireless/rtl8187_dev.c: In function ‘rtl8187_probe’: drivers/net/wireless/rtl8187_dev.c:610: error: ‘IEEE80211_HW_DATA_NULLFUNC_ACK’ undeclared (first use in this function)

Re: net-2.6.24 rebased

2007-08-30 Thread David Miller
From: Johannes Berg [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 13:58:12 +0200 Huh? I'm fairly sure I sent a patch to remove it from that driver, no idea where it got lost. FWIW, you can simply delete the | IEEE80211_HW_DATA_NULLFUNC_ACK part. It might have been a mis-merge between John and

Re: net-2.6.24 rebased

2007-08-29 Thread Joe Perches
On Wed, 2007-08-29 at 16:41 -0700, David Miller wrote: From: Joe Perches [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 16:34:00 -0700 On Tue, 2007-08-28 at 17:59 -0700, David Miller wrote: I pushed this fix into net-2.6.24 just now, thanks again. This tree doesn't compile for me defconfig

Re: net-2.6.24 rebased

2007-08-28 Thread Michael Chan
On Tue, 2007-08-28 at 17:25 -0700, David Miller wrote: The new NAPI struct patch is in there, one caveat of the new behavior is that in drivers that conditionalize NAPI support we can't be lazy and do the napi_{enable,disable}() outside of the ifdefs any longer. I tried to audit all the

Re: net-2.6.24 rebased

2007-08-28 Thread David Miller
From: Michael Chan [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 18:33:19 -0700 It seems that tg3 and bnx2 still have the tx locking changes. David, didn't you revert those changes a few weeks ago? I could have sworn I did, thanks for catching that I'll fix it up. - To unsubscribe from this list:

Re: net-2.6.24 rebased

2007-08-28 Thread David Miller
From: David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 17:54:04 -0700 (PDT) I could have sworn I did, thanks for catching that I'll fix it up. I pushed this fix into net-2.6.24 just now, thanks again. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe netdev in the body of a