On Mon, 26 Feb 2007 23:07:47 +0300, Sergei Shtylyov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yeah, tc35815_1.c in our looks like the one in the CELF archive (what I
> didn't get is why they decided to keep both drivers around?)
I think tc35815_1.c can just replace old tc35815.c. New one lacks
tc35815_ki
Hello.
Atsushi Nemoto wrote:
I know both MontaVista and CELF have new driver for the chip. If
anybody in MontaVista did not complain I can send CELF's one available
at http://tree.celinuxforum.org/pubwiki/moin.cgi/PatchArchive. (it
Yeah, tc35815_1.c in our looks like the one in the CELF
On Mon, 26 Feb 2007 10:26:59 +, Ralf Baechle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I created my own patch for this (and one other bug), and checked it in.
> >
> > Really, though, someone in MIPS-land should give this driver some loving
> > care. It is filled with bugs and 2.4-era anachronisms.
>
>
On Sat, Feb 24, 2007 at 05:04:01PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> >>I am a graduate student working on finding bugs in Linux drivers using
> >>an automated research tool. I think I've found a possible bug in
> >>net/tc35815.c, and I'd appreciate it if you could confirm/disconfirm it.
> >>
> >>Thanks
Michal Piotrowski wrote:
Hi Philip,
Philip Guo napisał(a):
Hi,
I am a graduate student working on finding bugs in Linux drivers using
an automated research tool. I think I've found a possible bug in
net/tc35815.c, and I'd appreciate it if you could confirm/disconfirm it.
Thanks,
Philip
---
Hi Philip,
Philip Guo napisał(a):
> Hi,
>
> I am a graduate student working on finding bugs in Linux drivers using
> an automated research tool. I think I've found a possible bug in
> net/tc35815.c, and I'd appreciate it if you could confirm/disconfirm it.
>
> Thanks,
> Philip
>
> ---
> net/tc
