Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Thu, Jan 10, 2008 at 03:26:59PM +, Jeba Anandhan escreveu:
>> Hi Eric,
>> Thanks for the reply. I have one more doubt. For example, if we have 2
>> processor and 4 ethernet cards. Only CPU0 does all work through 8 cards.
>> If we set the affinity to each eth
Em Thu, Jan 10, 2008 at 03:26:59PM +, Jeba Anandhan escreveu:
> Hi Eric,
> Thanks for the reply. I have one more doubt. For example, if we have 2
> processor and 4 ethernet cards. Only CPU0 does all work through 8 cards.
> If we set the affinity to each ethernet card as CPU number, will it be
>
Hi Eric,
Thanks for the reply. I have one more doubt. For example, if we have 2
processor and 4 ethernet cards. Only CPU0 does all work through 8 cards.
If we set the affinity to each ethernet card as CPU number, will it be
efficient?.
Will this be default behavior?
# cat /proc/interrupts
On Thu, 10 Jan 2008 14:05:46 +
Jeba Anandhan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> If a server has multiple processors and N number of ethernet cards, is
> it possible to handle transmission by each processor separately? .In
> other words, each processor will be responsible for tx of few e
Hi All,
If a server has multiple processors and N number of ethernet cards, is
it possible to handle transmission by each processor separately? .In
other words, each processor will be responsible for tx of few ethernet
cards?.
Example: Server has 4 processors and 8 ethernet cards. is it possibl
