Re: Strange TCP SACK behaviour in Linux TCP

2006-07-19 Thread Oumer Teyeb
Could you please CC your answers to me? thanx! Oumer Teyeb wrote: Hi Stephen, Thanks for the quick response. I have done what you asked and you can find the files at www.kom.auc.dk/~oumer/sackstuff.tar.gz I have run the different cases 10 times each, NT_NSACK[1-10].dat---no timestamp, no

Re: Strange TCP SACK behaviour in Linux TCP

2006-07-18 Thread Stephen Hemminger
On Tue, 18 Jul 2006 18:20:47 +0200 Oumer Teyeb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello Guys, I have some questions regarding TCP SACK implementation in Linux . As I am a subscriber, could you please cc the reply to me? thanks! I am doing these experiments to find out the impact of reordering. So

Re: Strange TCP SACK behaviour in Linux TCP

2006-07-18 Thread Stephen Hemminger
On Tue, 18 Jul 2006 18:20:47 +0200 Oumer Teyeb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello Guys, I have some questions regarding TCP SACK implementation in Linux . As I am a subscriber, could you please cc the reply to me? thanks! I am doing these experiments to find out the impact of reordering. So

Re: Strange TCP SACK behaviour in Linux TCP

2006-07-18 Thread Oumer Teyeb
Hi Stephen, Thanks for the quick response. I have done what you asked and you can find the files at www.kom.auc.dk/~oumer/sackstuff.tar.gz I have run the different cases 10 times each, NT_NSACK[1-10].dat---no timestamp, no SACK NT_SACK[1-10].datno timestamp, SACK