Boris B. Zhmurov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> :
[...]
> Thanks Francois, after your suggestions, network performance was twice
> increased, but I'm still loosing to freebsd:
Ok, now that the Linux kernel is not in heavy debugging mode, it takes
some ~10 us/(sent packet). It is not _too_ far from the usual
Francois Romieu wrote:
Is there any chance to get linux worked at least as fast, as freebsd-6.1
with small udp packets?
Any help will be more than welcome!
Please, CC: me, due to I'm not subscribed to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can you publish dmesg, vmstat 1 and /proc/interrupts somewhere ?
ftp://b
Boris B. Zhmurov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> :
[...]
> Is there any chance to get linux worked at least as fast, as freebsd-6.1
> with small udp packets?
> Any help will be more than welcome!
> Please, CC: me, due to I'm not subscribed to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can you publish dmesg, vmstat 1 and /proc/interr
Francois Romieu wrote:
Boris B. Zhmurov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> :
[...]
Any ideas are welcome.
Usually my Pavlov answer is "disable iptables, run latest kernel, renice
ksoftirqd like hell, see if it makes a difference and keep netdev Cced".
Of course there is no iptables. And linux-2.6.18 show
(adding netdev to Cc: so that the patch gets publically known)
Boris B. Zhmurov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> :
[...]
> Hello Francois. I've figured out, that this patch wasn't merged in
> linux-2.6.18 :(
Bad timing. Patches are available.
> Is there any plans to merge it in mainline ?
Jeff pulled most
The r8169 branch at git://electric-eye.fr.zoreil.com/home/romieu/linux-2.6.git
has been replaced by an updated version which should correctly support
the 8168 chipset given Boris and David's feedback.
The previous version of the r8169 branch has been archived as r8169-20060612.
The changes may su
