Yanping Du <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> We found the standard 16-bit tcp checksum is not
> strong enough in some cases. Is there any roadmap on
> implementing RFC1146 (tcp alternative checksum
> options) in Linux tcp stack ?
The standard way to solve this problem is to either use
SSL or IPSec.
On Mon, Oct 15, 2007 at 06:15:11PM -0700, Yanping Du wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We found the standard 16-bit tcp checksum is not
> strong enough in some cases. Is there any roadmap on
> implementing RFC1146 (tcp alternative checksum
> options) in Linux tcp stack ? If yes, how soon will
> that be in ?
If
Yanping Du wrote:
Hi,
We found the standard 16-bit tcp checksum is not
strong enough in some cases. Is there any roadmap on
implementing RFC1146 (tcp alternative checksum
options) in Linux tcp stack ? If yes, how soon will
that be in ?
Please kindly copy reply to my email address as I've
not
On 10/16/07, Yanping Du <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We found the standard 16-bit tcp checksum is not
> strong enough in some cases. Is there any roadmap on
> implementing RFC1146 (tcp alternative checksum
> options) in Linux tcp stack ? If yes, how soon will
> that be in ?
>
> Please kin
Hi,
We found the standard 16-bit tcp checksum is not
strong enough in some cases. Is there any roadmap on
implementing RFC1146 (tcp alternative checksum
options) in Linux tcp stack ? If yes, how soon will
that be in ?
Please kindly copy reply to my email address as I've
not subscribed the netde
