Re: address pingable with interface down

2006-05-10 Thread Christopher Friesen
David S. Miller wrote: From: Jon DeVree <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> I've noticed in the past that the address owned by an interface is still pingable after that interface is brought down. People bring this up all the time and this behavior is intentional. This is becoming a serious FAQ and very

Re: address pingable with interface down

2006-05-10 Thread Ian McDonald
So where's the linux networking faq? I've been lurking here long enough to know that there's no shortage of faqs, but there's no canonical netdev faq that i'm aware of. Maybe one should be started? Jason http://linux-net.osdl.org/index.php/ is the linux networking canonical wiki. I've added th

Re: address pingable with interface down

2006-05-10 Thread David S. Miller
From: Jon DeVree <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 15:48:18 -0400 > I've noticed in the past that the address owned by an interface is > still pingable after that interface is brought down. People bring this up all the time and this behavior is intentional. Linux uses a "host based" add

address pingable with interface down

2006-05-10 Thread Jon DeVree
I've noticed in the past that the address owned by an interface is still pingable after that interface is brought down. This appears to be because the routing table entry for the address itself is never removed when the interface is brought down. I'm curious if this is desired behavior or if this i