Hi Sedat,
On Sat, 27 Mar 2021 12:50:55 +0100 Sedat Dilek wrote:
>
> I wonder why Stephen's fixup-patch was not carried in recent
> Linux-next releases.
It is part of the tip tree merge commit. So it is not an explicit
commit on its own, but the needed change is there.
> Wild speculation - no r
On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 2:11 PM Borislav Petkov wrote:
>
> On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 09:57:43AM +0100, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> > The commit b90829704780 "bpf: Use NOP_ATOMIC5 instead of
> > emit_nops(&prog, 5) for BPF_TRAMP_F_CALL_ORIG" is now in Linus Git
> > (see [1]).
> >
> > Where will Stephen's fi
On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 09:57:43AM +0100, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> The commit b90829704780 "bpf: Use NOP_ATOMIC5 instead of
> emit_nops(&prog, 5) for BPF_TRAMP_F_CALL_ORIG" is now in Linus Git
> (see [1]).
>
> Where will Stephen's fixup-patch be carried?
> Linux-next?
> net-next?
> ?
I guess we'll re
On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 10:02 AM Borislav Petkov wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 02:37:14PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > After merging the tip tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig)
> > failed like this:
> >
> > arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c: In function 'arch_
On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 4:39 AM Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the tip tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig)
> failed like this:
>
> arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c: In function 'arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline':
> arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c:2015:16: error: 'ideal_no
On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 02:37:14PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the tip tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig)
> failed like this:
>
> arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c: In function 'arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline':
> arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c:2015:16: error:
Hi all,
After merging the tip tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig)
failed like this:
arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c: In function 'arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline':
arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c:2015:16: error: 'ideal_nops' undeclared (first use
in this function)
2015 | memcpy(prog, ide
On Tue, Apr 03, 2018 at 01:39:08PM +0100, David Howells wrote:
> Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
> > I figured that since there were only a handful of users it wasn't a
> > popular API, also David very much knew of those patches changing it so
> > could easily have pulled in the special tip/sched/wait br
Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> + wait_var_event(&rxnet->nr_calls, !atomic_read(&rxnet->nr_calls));
I would prefer == 0 to ! as it's not really a true/false value.
But apart from that, it's looks okay and you can add my Reviewed-by.
David
Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> I figured that since there were only a handful of users it wasn't a
> popular API, also David very much knew of those patches changing it so
> could easily have pulled in the special tip/sched/wait branch :/
I'm not sure I could, since I have to base on net-next. I'm not
On Tue, Apr 03, 2018 at 03:41:22PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Caused by commit
>
> 9b8cce52c4b5 ("sched/wait: Remove the wait_on_atomic_t() API")
>
> interacting with commits
>
> d3be4d244330 ("xrpc: Fix potential call vs socket/net destruction race")
> 31f5f9a1691e ("rxrpc: Fix app
Hi all,
After merging the tip tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig)
failed like this:
net/rxrpc/call_object.c: In function 'rxrpc_rcu_destroy_call':
net/rxrpc/call_object.c:661:3: error: implicit declaration of function
'wake_up_atomic_t'; did you mean 'wake_up_bit'?
[-Werror=imp
On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 3:51 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the tip tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig)
> failed like this:
>
> In file included from include/linux/workqueue.h:8:0,
> from include/linux/srcu.h:34,
> from inc
Hi all,
After merging the tip tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig)
failed like this:
In file included from include/linux/workqueue.h:8:0,
from include/linux/srcu.h:34,
from include/linux/notifier.h:15,
from include/linux/memory_ho
Hi all,
After merging the tip tree, today's linux-next build (arm
multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:
net/core/dev.c: In function 'sk_busy_loop':
net/core/dev.c:5065:3: error: implicit declaration of function
'cpu_relax_lowlatency' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
cpu_relax_lowlatenc
From: Stephen Rothwell
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2015 11:30:53 +1000
> I have added the following fix patch for today:
>
> From: Stephen Rothwell
> Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2015 11:10:16 +1000
> Subject: [PATCH] cdc: add header guards
>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell
Applied, thanks Stephen.
--
To unsub
Hi all,
After merging the next-20150915 version of the tip tree, today's
linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig) failed like this:
In file included from drivers/usb/gadget/function/u_ether.h:20:0,
from drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_ncm.c:26:
include/linux/usb/cdc.h:23:8: error: re
17 matches
Mail list logo
