Hi,
commit ddf1c0e35d73b05ebc9fc12cb374315f806a2764 introduced these problems,
are people testing with _and_ without SELinux?
security_sid_to_context is only found
at security/selinux/include/security.h, i.e. at SELinux, not at the
LSM level, was some
LSM patch introducing
Hi,
I will work on a fix.
Catherine
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 03/10/2006 10:48:18 AM:
Hi,
commit ddf1c0e35d73b05ebc9fc12cb374315f806a2764 introduced these
problems,
are people testing with _and_ without SELinux?
security_sid_to_context is only found
at
On 3/10/06, Xiaolan Zhang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I will work on a fix.
Thanks.
- Arnaldo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe netdev in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On 3/10/06, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 3/10/06, Xiaolan Zhang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I will work on a fix.
Thanks.
More breakage, this time with make allmodconfig, please fix.
- Arnaldo
/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/acme/net-2.6.17/security/dummy.c: In
On 3/10/06, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 3/10/06, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 3/10/06, Xiaolan Zhang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I will work on a fix.
Thanks.
More breakage, this time with make allmodconfig, please fix.
-
Hi, Arnaldo,
This looks a bit surprising because that 2 lines should have already been
in the patch (lsm-secpeer) that this patch (lsm-secpeer-unix) depends on.
See below:
thanks,
Catherine
diff -puN security/dummy.c~lsm-secpeer security/dummy.c
---
On 3/10/06, Xiaolan Zhang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, Arnaldo,
This looks a bit surprising because that 2 lines should have already been
in the patch (lsm-secpeer) that this patch (lsm-secpeer-unix) depends on.
See below:
Look at:
Arnaldo,
Thanks for the update and quick fix!
Catherine
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 03/10/2006 02:50:48 PM:
On 3/10/06, Xiaolan Zhang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, Arnaldo,
This looks a bit surprising because that 2 lines should have already
been
in the patch (lsm-secpeer) that this