From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2006 14:44:12 +1100
I stumbled accross what might be a bug on out of order architecture:
netif_poll_enable() only does a clear_bit(). However,
netif_poll_disable/enable pairs are often used as simili-spinlocks.
On Thu, 2006-12-28 at 21:09 -0800, David Miller wrote:
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2006 14:44:12 +1100
I stumbled accross what might be a bug on out of order architecture:
netif_poll_enable() only does a clear_bit(). However,
Hi !
I stumbled accross what might be a bug on out of order architecture:
netif_poll_enable() only does a clear_bit(). However,
netif_poll_disable/enable pairs are often used as simili-spinlocks.
(netif_poll_enable() has pretty much spin_lock semantics except that it
schedules instead of