On Apr 13, 2007, at 09:53, David Hollis wrote:
On Wed, 2007-04-11 at 16:42 -0500, Kim Phillips wrote:
On Wed, 11 Apr 2007 03:03:56 +0200
Lennert Buytenhek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There may not be as much, but there definitely are still cases where
there are devices that may have one of
On Wed, 2007-04-11 at 16:42 -0500, Kim Phillips wrote:
On Wed, 11 Apr 2007 03:03:56 +0200
Lennert Buytenhek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Apr 10, 2007 at 05:20:52PM -0500, Kim Phillips wrote:
(note I'm coming from an embedded world here.)
Please read this:
On Fri, 2007-04-13 at 13:00 -0500, Andy Fleming wrote:
Or are there too many cases where NIC x needs to do these fiddlings
with
PHY y, where as NIC z has to do different fiddlings with PHY y?
I worry about this point, but I believe that a proper abstraction
must be possible.
On Wed, 11 Apr 2007 03:03:56 +0200
Lennert Buytenhek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Apr 10, 2007 at 05:20:52PM -0500, Kim Phillips wrote:
(note I'm coming from an embedded world here.)
Please read this:
http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdevm=116527863300952w=2
Not sure how to
I've been keeping an eye on PHYLIB since it's addition to the kernel
some time ago and I'm a bit curious as to why it doesn't seem to have
much up-take among other drivers. A quick check of the kernel source
shows only two users (AU1000 and gianfar) and both look to be embedded
type devices. Are
On Tue, 10 Apr 2007 14:41:01 -0400
David Hollis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been keeping an eye on PHYLIB since it's addition to the kernel
some time ago and I'm a bit curious as to why it doesn't seem to have
much up-take among other drivers. A quick check of the kernel source
shows only
On Tue, Apr 10, 2007 at 05:20:52PM -0500, Kim Phillips wrote:
(note I'm coming from an embedded world here.)
Please read this:
http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdevm=116527863300952w=2
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe netdev in
the body of a message to [EMAIL
