On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 02:05:06PM -0300, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 08:29:05PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> >
> > I would like to bring up some problems with the current GSO
> > implementation in SCTP.
> >
> > The most important for me right now is that SCTP uses
>
On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 08:29:05PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
>
> I would like to bring up some problems with the current GSO
> implementation in SCTP.
>
> The most important for me right now is that SCTP uses
> "skb_gro_receive()" to build "GSO" frames :-(
>
> Really it just ends up using the s
I would like to bring up some problems with the current GSO
implementation in SCTP.
The most important for me right now is that SCTP uses
"skb_gro_receive()" to build "GSO" frames :-(
Really it just ends up using the slow path (basically, label 'merge'
and onwards).
So, using a GRO helper to b
