Re: [PATCH 3/4] ehea: queue managment

2006-06-08 Thread Muli Ben-Yehuda
On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 10:29:50AM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote: Be careful about global namespace issues. Stick to one prefix like ehea_ for all non static function names. Consider putting all in one file, or use #include to cause it to be one compilation unit. I thought including .c files

Re: [patch] workaround zd1201 interference problem

2006-06-08 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! Well, I'll try _enable() alone, but it seems to me that _enable() command is needed to initialize radio properly. I do not think we can get much further without firmware sources... If you can formulate a proper and technical description of the issue (and exactly what is needed to

Re: [patch] workaround zd1201 interference problem

2006-06-08 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! Well, I'll try _enable() alone, but it seems to me that _enable() command is needed to initialize radio properly. I do not think we can get much further without firmware sources... If you can formulate a proper and technical description of the issue (and exactly what is needed

[PATCH 4/12] d80211: fix Oops when writing to add_ and remove_iface

2006-06-08 Thread Jiri Benc
When add_iface or remove_iface sysfs attribute is opened just before device is unregistered and some data is written there afterwards, their handlers try to access master net_device which is released at that point. A similar problem can happen when ioctl is invoked during unregistering - it is

[PATCH 10/12] d80211: rate_control sysfs attributes

2006-06-08 Thread Jiri Benc
Add support for sysfs attributes for rate_control modules. Signed-off-by: Jiri Benc [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- net/d80211/ieee80211.c| 13 - net/d80211/rate_control.c | 42 ++ net/d80211/rate_control.h | 36

[PATCH 11/12] d80211: encryption keys sysfs attributes

2006-06-08 Thread Jiri Benc
Add /sys/class/ieee80211/phyX/sta/*/key/* and /sys/class/net/X/keys/[0-3]/* attributes. Signed-off-by: Jiri Benc [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- net/d80211/ieee80211.c | 33 ++ net/d80211/ieee80211_i.h | 11 ++ net/d80211/ieee80211_ioctl.c | 101 ---

[PATCH 3/12] d80211: separate allocation of ieee80211_local

2006-06-08 Thread Jiri Benc
ieee80211_local has a separate class_device. That means it has reference counting independent of master net_device and can be freed at a different time, therefore these two structures cannot be allocated together. Solve this by adding ieee80211_ptr pointer to net_device structure (similar to

[PATCH 0/12] d80211: use sysfs instead of procfs

2006-06-08 Thread Jiri Benc
The following series of patches makes d80211 to use sysfs instead of procfs. This means that custom reference counting in most structures is replaced by kobjects and nearly all informations from procfs files are converted to sysfs attributes. The only information missing in sysfs (compared to

[PATCH 6/12] d80211: network interface sysfs attributes

2006-06-08 Thread Jiri Benc
Add /sys/class/net/X/* attributes for 802.11 interfaces. Signed-off-by: Jiri Benc [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- net/d80211/ieee80211_i.h |3 net/d80211/ieee80211_iface.c |1 net/d80211/ieee80211_sysfs.c | 299 ++ 3 files changed, 301

[PATCH 5/12] d80211: wiphy sysfs attributes

2006-06-08 Thread Jiri Benc
Add /sys/class/ieee80211/phyX/* attributes. Signed-off-by: Jiri Benc [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- net/d80211/ieee80211_proc.c |4 - net/d80211/ieee80211_proc.h |3 net/d80211/ieee80211_sysfs.c | 304 +- 3 files changed, 302 insertions(+), 9

[PATCH 2/12] d80211: better sysfs registration of symlinks to wiphy

2006-06-08 Thread Jiri Benc
Lately, delayed sysfs registration of net_device (in netdev_run_todo) was removed. This allows us to remove hack that used class interface for sysfs registration. Signed-off-by: Jiri Benc [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- net/d80211/ieee80211.c | 18 +++-- net/d80211/ieee80211_i.h

[PATCH 9/12] d80211: remove useless parameters

2006-06-08 Thread Jiri Benc
There is no necessity for passing ieee80211_local parameter to sta_info_put and sta_info_free now. Signed-off-by: Jiri Benc [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- net/d80211/ieee80211.c | 18 +- net/d80211/ieee80211_iface.c |4 ++-- net/d80211/ieee80211_ioctl.c | 20

[PATCH 8/12] d80211: sysfs attributes for associated stations

2006-06-08 Thread Jiri Benc
Add /sys/class/ieee80211/phyX/sta/* attributes. Signed-off-by: Jiri Benc [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- net/d80211/Makefile |1 net/d80211/ieee80211.c |5 + net/d80211/ieee80211_i.h | 14 ++ net/d80211/ieee80211_proc.c |3 -

[PATCH 12/12] d80211: remove procfs files

2006-06-08 Thread Jiri Benc
Remove procfs support. Signed-off-by: Jiri Benc [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- net/d80211/Makefile |1 net/d80211/ieee80211.c |7 net/d80211/ieee80211_iface.c |3 net/d80211/ieee80211_proc.c | 768 -- net/d80211/ieee80211_proc.h |

[PATCH 7/12] d80211: rename sta_info_relase to sta_info_put

2006-06-08 Thread Jiri Benc
sta_info structure has reference counting (will be converted to kobject in next patch). Therefore, sta_info_release should be divided into two functions - one for decrementing reference count and one for freeing the structure when the count drops to zero. sta_info_release is the name suitable for

[PATCH 1/12] d80211: deinit sysfs in case of an error

2006-06-08 Thread Jiri Benc
When ieee80211_wme_register fails in ieee80211_init, ieee80211 class was not unregistered. Signed-off-by: Jiri Benc [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- net/d80211/ieee80211.c |1 + 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) 3aed246a5117bd4d1a4f2d5f5074c583d9b4941e diff --git

Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] iWARP Connection Manager.

2006-06-08 Thread Andrew Morton
On Wed, 07 Jun 2006 15:06:05 -0500 Steve Wise [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This patch provides the new files implementing the iWARP Connection Manager. Review Changes: - sizeof - sizeof() - removed printks - removed TT debug code - cleaned up lock/unlock around switch statements.

Re: [PATCH v2 4/7] AMSO1100 Memory Management.

2006-06-08 Thread Andrew Morton
On Wed, 07 Jun 2006 15:06:55 -0500 Steve Wise [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: +void c2_free(struct c2_alloc *alloc, u32 obj) +{ + spin_lock(alloc-lock); + clear_bit(obj, alloc-table); + spin_unlock(alloc-lock); +} The spinlock is unneeded here. What does all the code in this file

[PATCH 0/5] ehea: IBM eHEA Ethernet Device Driver

2006-06-08 Thread Jan-Bernd Themann
Hello, thanks for your comments. It seems that yesterday's patch 1/4 has not been delivered. We changed some things according to your comments. Signed-off-by: Jan-Bernd Themann [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changelog-by: Jan-Bernd Themann [EMAIL PROTECTED] Differences to patch set

[PATCH 2/5] ehea: pHYP interface

2006-06-08 Thread Jan-Bernd Themann
Signed-off-by: Jan-Bernd Themann [EMAIL PROTECTED] drivers/net/ehea/ehea_phyp.c | 1023 +++ drivers/net/ehea/ehea_phyp.h | 625 ++ 2 files changed, 1648 insertions(+) --- linux-2.6.16-rc5-orig/drivers/net/ehea/ehea_phyp.c

[PATCH 3/5] ehea: queue management

2006-06-08 Thread Jan-Bernd Themann
Signed-off-by: Jan-Bernd Themann [EMAIL PROTECTED] drivers/net/ehea/ehea_qmr.c | 719 drivers/net/ehea/ehea_qmr.h | 390 +++ 2 files changed, 1109 insertions(+) --- linux-2.6.16-rc5-orig/drivers/net/ehea/ehea_qmr.c

[PATCH 5/5] ehea: makefile and Kconfig

2006-06-08 Thread Jan-Bernd Themann
Signed-off-by: Jan-Bernd Themann [EMAIL PROTECTED] drivers/net/ehea/Kconfig |6 ++ drivers/net/ehea/Makefile |7 +++ 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+) --- linux-2.6.16-rc5-orig/drivers/net/ehea/Makefile 1969-12-31 16:00:00.0 -0800 +++

[PATCH 4/5] ehea: main header files

2006-06-08 Thread Jan-Bernd Themann
Signed-off-by: Jan-Bernd Themann [EMAIL PROTECTED] drivers/net/ehea/ehea.h| 434 + drivers/net/ehea/ehea_hw.h | 319 + 2 files changed, 753 insertions(+) --- linux-2.6.16-rc5-orig/drivers/net/ehea/ehea.h

EHEA: Is there a size limit below 80K for patches?

2006-06-08 Thread Jan-Bernd Themann
Hello, we tried two times to send a patch set. In both cases the second (largest) patch got lost. The first one was a bit above 100k, the second one we tried was like 75K. Any idea what might be the problem? Thanks, Jan-Bernd Themann - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe

Re: [PATCH 2.6.17-rc6-mm1 ] net: RFC 3828-compliant UDP-Lite support

2006-06-08 Thread YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] (at Thu, 8 Jun 2006 11:50:33 +0100), Gerrit Renker [EMAIL PROTECTED] says: + UDP-Lite introduces a new socket type, the SOCK_LDGRAM (note the L) for + lightweight, connection-less services. These are the socket options: I disagree. It should be SOCK_DGRAM. --

Re: EHEA: Is there a size limit below 80K for patches?

2006-06-08 Thread Christoph Raisch
well, now I'm confused... 2 People, two opinions Here's a URL for a complete tarball, sharing the download location with our other driver. http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/ibmehcad/ehea_EHEA_0002.tgz We're waiting for a sourceforge project now since 9 days to put out a tgz, and it looks

[PATCH] myri10ge update

2006-06-08 Thread Brice Goglin
The following patch updates the myri10ge to 1.0.0, with the following changes: * Switch to dma_alloc_coherent API. * Avoid PCI burst when writing the firmware on chipset with unaligned completions. * Use ethtool_op_set_tx_hw_csum instead of ethtool_op_set_tx_csum. * Include linux/dma-mapping.h to

Re: PATCH 2.6.17-rc5 tulip free_irq() called too late

2006-06-08 Thread Jeff Garzik
(CC'ing our newly minted tulip maintainer, Val) Grant Grundler wrote: Jeff, SLES10 testing exposed an MCA that was confirmed to be a DMA IO TLB miss. This means tulip device was attempting to DMA to memory that was already unmapped. The test was crashing in the ifconfig down step when a 4-port

PATCH to correct dump of WPA IE

2006-06-08 Thread Larry Finger
In net/ieee80211/softmac/ieee80211softmac_wx.c, there is a bug that prints extended sign information whenever the byte value exceeds 0x7f. The following patch changes the printk to use a u8 cast to limit the output to 2 digits. This bug was first noticed by Dan Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED]. This

Re: EHEA: Is there a size limit below 80K for patches?

2006-06-08 Thread Jeff Garzik
Christoph Raisch wrote: well, now I'm confused... 2 People, two opinions Here's a URL for a complete tarball, sharing the download location with our other driver. http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/ibmehcad/ehea_EHEA_0002.tgz We're waiting for a sourceforge project now since 9 days to put

Re: [PATCH 2/2] PHYLIB/gianfar: Use phy_ethtool_get_link() for get_link op

2006-06-08 Thread Jeff Garzik
Nathaniel Case wrote: This patch makes the gianfar ethtool code use phy_ethtool_get_link() instead of ethtool_op_get_link(). Patch depends on previous one (1/2). Signed-off-by: Nate Case [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- --- a/drivers/net/gianfar_ethtool.c 2006-06-05 11:27:19.0 -0500 +++

Re: [PATCH 1/9] NetXen 1G/10G ethernet driver patch with corrections

2006-06-08 Thread Pradeep Dalvi
diff -u linux-2.6.16.20/drivers/net/netxen/netxen_nic_ethtool.c linux-2.6.16.20/drivers/net/netxen/netxen_nic_ethtool.c --- linux-2.6.16.20/drivers/net/netxen/netxen_nic_ethtool.c 2006-06-06 06:58:11.0 -0700 +++ linux-2.6.16.20/drivers/net/netxen/netxen_nic_ethtool.c 2006-06-08

Re: [PATCH 2.6.17-rc6-mm1 ] net: RFC 3828-compliant UDP-Lite support

2006-06-08 Thread Alan Cox
Ar Iau, 2006-06-08 am 11:50 +0100, ysgrifennodd Gerrit Renker: + UDP-Lite introduces a new socket type, the SOCK_LDGRAM (note the L) for + lightweight, connection-less services. These are the socket options: This is not the intended use of the socket API when distinguishing between services.

Re: [PATCH 2.6.17-rc6-mm1 ] net: RFC 3828-compliant UDP-Lite support

2006-06-08 Thread YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] (at Thu, 08 Jun 2006 15:47:52 +0100), Alan Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED] says: Ar Iau, 2006-06-08 am 11:50 +0100, ysgrifennodd Gerrit Renker: + UDP-Lite introduces a new socket type, the SOCK_LDGRAM (note the L) for + lightweight, connection-less services. These are

Re: [PATCH 2/2] PHYLIB/gianfar: Use phy_ethtool_get_link() for get_link op

2006-06-08 Thread Nathaniel Case
On Thu, 2006-06-08 at 10:58 -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote: +static u32 gfar_get_link(struct net_device *dev) +{ + struct gfar_private *priv = netdev_priv(dev); + struct phy_device *phydev = priv-phydev; + + if (NULL == phydev) + return -ENODEV; NAK, return code

Re: PATCH 2.6.17-rc5 tulip free_irq() called too late

2006-06-08 Thread Grant Grundler
On Thu, Jun 08, 2006 at 10:43:04AM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote: (CC'ing our newly minted tulip maintainer, Val) Excellent! Has MAINTAINERS file been updated? :) ... NAK. This is a band-aid, and one that creates new problems even as it attempts to solve problems. You failed to demonstrate that

Re: PATCH 2.6.17-rc5 tulip free_irq() called too late

2006-06-08 Thread Grant Grundler
On Thu, Jun 08, 2006 at 09:22:21AM -0600, Grant Grundler wrote: Perhaps cp_close() in 8139cp.c could be an example of a good ordering? It stops the chip, syncs irqs, frees irq, then frees [thus unmapping] the rings. Sorry, I don't see how it matters if we disable chip IRQ first or

Re: [PATCH 2/2] PHYLIB/gianfar: Use phy_ethtool_get_link() for get_link op

2006-06-08 Thread Jeff Garzik
Nathaniel Case wrote: On Thu, 2006-06-08 at 10:58 -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote: +static u32 gfar_get_link(struct net_device *dev) +{ + struct gfar_private *priv = netdev_priv(dev); + struct phy_device *phydev = priv-phydev; + + if (NULL == phydev) + return -ENODEV;

Re: PATCH 2.6.17-rc5 tulip free_irq() called too late

2006-06-08 Thread Jeff Garzik
Grant Grundler wrote: On Thu, Jun 08, 2006 at 10:43:04AM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote: (CC'ing our newly minted tulip maintainer, Val) Excellent! Has MAINTAINERS file been updated? :) It should be updated, yes. Calling free_irq() while the chip is still active is just a bad idea, because the

Re: PATCH 2.6.17-rc5 tulip free_irq() called too late

2006-06-08 Thread Grant Grundler
On Thu, Jun 08, 2006 at 11:32:39AM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote: The chip IRQ gets turned off in tulip_down(). It won't be screaming for very long. Then you admit that you add a race. Yes - I realized that after I hit send :( ... In the shared IRQ case, I expect free_irq() to unlink this

Re: PATCH 2.6.17-rc5 tulip free_irq() called too late

2006-06-08 Thread Jeff Garzik
Grant Grundler wrote: Ok...I think I understand what you are driving at here. The case is when CPU vector is enabled and shared but one device _without_ an interrupt handler is registered is still yanking on the interrupt line. It will cause linux to disable the line since the IRQ isn't being

Re: [PATCH] pcnet32 driver NAPI support

2006-06-08 Thread Lennart Sorensen
On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 03:32:45PM -0700, Don Fry wrote: One other problem I ran into. I applied the patch but it will not compile because rl_active is never defined. I have worked around it but Doh! I thought I cleaned up all my weird code from my own version. Because of the platform I work

Re: PATCH 2.6.17-rc5 tulip free_irq() called too late

2006-06-08 Thread Grant Grundler
On Thu, Jun 08, 2006 at 11:38:52AM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote: Can we call free_irq() from tulip_down()? I'm sure you can answer that yourself. If it doesn't cause problems elsewhere, yes. Otherwise, no. :) Yeah, well, I was hoping you would Just Know (tm). :) Research takes time. Did

[PATCH] s2io: netpoll support

2006-06-08 Thread Brian Haley
This adds netpoll support for things like netconsole/kgdboe to the s2io 10GbE driver. This duplicates some code from s2io_poll() as I wanted to be least-invasive, someone from Neterion might have other thoughts? Signed-off-by: Brian Haley [EMAIL PROTECTED] diff --git a/drivers/net/s2io.c

Re: New tulip maintainer...

2006-06-08 Thread Grant Grundler
On Thu, Jun 08, 2006 at 11:41:28AM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote: Now that we have a new tulip maintainer, perhaps a resend of the long-outstanding tulip phy patches could be resent? All the tulip patches I have are archived here: ftp://ftp.parisc-linux.org/patches/ Anything else tulip

Re: [PATCH 5/5] ehea: makefile and Kconfig

2006-06-08 Thread Randy.Dunlap
On Thu, 08 Jun 2006 11:56:05 +0200 Jan-Bernd Themann wrote: Signed-off-by: Jan-Bernd Themann [EMAIL PROTECTED] drivers/net/ehea/Kconfig |6 ++ drivers/net/ehea/Makefile |7 +++ 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+) ---

Re: [PATCH 2.6.17-rc6-mm1 ] net: RFC 3828-compliant UDP-Lite support

2006-06-08 Thread Gerrit Renker
Quoting Alan Cox: | Ar Iau, 2006-06-08 am 11:50 +0100, ysgrifennodd Gerrit Renker: | + UDP-Lite introduces a new socket type, the SOCK_LDGRAM (note the L) for | + lightweight, connection-less services. These are the socket options: | | This is not the intended use of the socket API when

Re: [PATCH 2/2] PHYLIB/gianfar: Use phy_ethtool_get_link() for get_link op

2006-06-08 Thread Nathaniel Case
This patch makes the gianfar ethtool code use phy_ethtool_get_link() instead of ethtool_op_get_link(). Signed-off-by: Nate Case [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- --- a/drivers/net/gianfar_ethtool.c 2006-06-05 11:27:19.0 -0500 +++ b/drivers/net/gianfar_ethtool.c 2006-06-04 19:31:01.0

[PATCH RESEND] e100/e1000: fixes and pci error recovery

2006-06-08 Thread Auke Kok
Jeff, This is a resend of several earlier sent (and Acked) patches for e100 and e1000. They are available on our git server and contain: in branch upstream-fixes: [1] e1000: fix irq sharing when running ethtool test [2] e1000: remove risky prefetch on next_skb-data against

Re: PATCH 2.6.17-rc5 tulip free_irq() called too late

2006-06-08 Thread Grant Grundler
On Thu, Jun 08, 2006 at 10:43:04AM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote: ... Perhaps cp_close() in 8139cp.c could be an example of a good ordering? It stops the chip, syncs irqs, frees irq, then frees [thus unmapping] the rings. Here is a new patch that moves free_irq() into tulip_down(). The resulting

Netchannels: netchannel vs. socket. 2:0.

2006-06-08 Thread Evgeniy Polyakov
After some enhancements made for netchannel subsystem I'm pleased to announce, that netchannel subsystem outperforms existing layered design both in CPU usage and network speed. Well, after such pretentious introduction I want to cool things down. CPU usage is about 1-2% less for netchannels and

Re: [PATCH 1/2] e1000: fix netpoll with NAPI

2006-06-08 Thread Mitch Williams
On Wed, 2006-06-07 at 11:44 -0700, Jeff Moyer wrote: That patch locks around the tx clean routine. As such, it doesn't prevent the problem. The call to netif_rx_schedule_prep provides locking because it sets the __LINK_STATE_RX_SCHED bit atomically. The spinlock around e1000_clean_tx_irq is

Re: [PATCH 1/2] e1000: fix netpoll with NAPI

2006-06-08 Thread Jeff Moyer
== Regarding Re: [PATCH 1/2] e1000: fix netpoll with NAPI; Mitch Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] adds: mitch.a.williams On Wed, 2006-06-07 at 11:44 -0700, Jeff Moyer wrote: That patch locks around the tx clean routine. As such, it doesn't prevent the problem. mitch.a.williams The call to

Re: [PATCH 1/2] e1000: fix netpoll with NAPI

2006-06-08 Thread Mitch Williams
On Wed, 2006-06-07 at 11:54 -0700, John W. Linville wrote: Pedantic objection, but I think this would read easier w/o the extra newline before disable_irq. Heh. I prefer to have a newline between declarations and code. The real problem is the position of the #ifdef -- that's what makes it

Fw: [Bugme-new] [Bug 6666] New: invalid tcp socket connection to windows stacks

2006-06-08 Thread Andrew Morton
Begin forwarded message: Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2006 05:23:04 -0700 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Bugme-new] [Bug ] New: invalid tcp socket connection to windows stacks http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id= Summary: invalid tcp socket connection

Re: Netchannels: netchannel vs. socket. 2:0.

2006-06-08 Thread Evgeniy Polyakov
On Thu, Jun 08, 2006 at 09:15:55PM +0400, Evgeniy Polyakov ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: After some enhancements made for netchannel subsystem I'm pleased to announce, that netchannel subsystem outperforms existing layered design both in CPU usage and network speed. Well, after such

[DOC] update bonding documentation with sysfs

2006-06-08 Thread Auke Kok
Jeff, Attached patch is pushed on top of #upstream on our git server also containing the resent patches earlier today. Please pull: git pull git://lost.foo-projects.org/~ahkok/git/netdev-2.6 upstream Cheers, Auke --- [DOC] Update bonding documentation with sysfs info Bonding

Re: [patch 06/17] neighbour.c, pneigh_get_next() skips published entry

2006-06-08 Thread Jari Takkala
On Mon, 5 Jun 2006, David Miller wrote: This patch doesn't make any sense, I've been over it a few times. The seqfile layer should take care of that user buffering issue transparently as long as we implement the interface callbacks properly. Even if something needs to be fixed in the

Re: [PATCH 1/2] e1000: fix netpoll with NAPI

2006-06-08 Thread John W. Linville
On Thu, Jun 08, 2006 at 10:23:56AM -0700, Mitch Williams wrote: On Wed, 2006-06-07 at 11:54 -0700, John W. Linville wrote: Pedantic objection, but I think this would read easier w/o the extra newline before disable_irq. Heh. I prefer to have a newline between declarations and code. The

Firewall question

2006-06-08 Thread Alex Davis
The scenario: I have a DSL modem in pass through (bridge) mode. The linux firewall/router has a single ethernet card. It is running pppoe. This gives two interfaces: eth0 and ppp0. The firewall is running iptables. There are several machines behind the firewall. Problem: I've been told that

Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 6666] New: invalid tcp socket connection to windows stacks

2006-06-08 Thread David Miller
FIN only gets output when the connection is actually closed for sending, and that is controlled by the application not by the kernel. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe netdev in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at

Re: Firewall question

2006-06-08 Thread Lennart Sorensen
On Thu, Jun 08, 2006 at 11:57:12AM -0700, Alex Davis wrote: The scenario: I have a DSL modem in pass through (bridge) mode. The linux firewall/router has a single ethernet card. It is running pppoe. This gives two interfaces: eth0 and ppp0. The firewall is running iptables. There are

Re: [PATCH 2.6.17-rc6-mm1 ] net: RFC 3828-compliant UDP-Lite support

2006-06-08 Thread David Miller
From: Gerrit Renker [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2006 12:22:54 +0100 I am sorry, I don't at the moment have the time to port to v6 with the same degree of rigour. You give the impression that you would just disappear from the face of the planet should your work actually be integrated

Re: [PATCH 2.6.17-rc6-mm1 ] net: RFC 3828-compliant UDP-Lite support

2006-06-08 Thread David Miller
From: Gerrit Renker [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2006 17:03:54 +0100 Understood. Please, anyone, disregard or un-apply the previous UDP-Lite patch. A revised patch will be prepared and posted as soon as testing permits. Nobody is going to integrate your patch anywhere, don't worry. You

Using netconsole for debugging suspend/resume

2006-06-08 Thread Jeremy Fitzhardinge
I've been trying to get suspend/resume working well on my new laptop. In general, netconsole has been pretty useful for extracting oopses and other messages, but it is of more limited help in debugging the actual suspend/resume cycle. The problem looks like the e1000 driver won't suspend

Re: [PATCH 9/10] Add Vitesse 8244 PHY for MPC8641 HPCN platform.

2006-06-08 Thread Jeff Garzik
Jon Loeliger wrote: Signed-off-by: Kriston Carson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Signed-off-by: Xianghua Xiao [EMAIL PROTECTED] Signed-off-by: Jon Loeliger [EMAIL PROTECTED] ACK, but patch does not apply to netdev-2.6.git#upstream. Jeff - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe

Re: [PATCH 1/5] skge: use workq for PHY handling

2006-06-08 Thread Jeff Garzik
applied 1-5 to #upstream - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe netdev in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Re: Please pull 'upstream-fixes' branch of wireless-2.6

2006-06-08 Thread Jeff Garzik
John W. Linville wrote: This pull is intended for 2.6.17 if at all possible. Thanks, John --- The following changes since commit 672c6108a51bf559d19595d9f8193dfd81f0f752: Linus Torvalds: Merge master.kernel.org:/.../jejb/scsi-rc-fixes-2.6 are found in the git repository at:

Re: Please pull 'upstream' branch of wireless-2.6

2006-06-08 Thread Jeff Garzik
John W. Linville wrote: This pull is intended for 2.6.18. Thanks, John --- The following changes since commit f6882a0688ea83db5fc2f3491ac9fcdce0834cc7: John W. Linville: Merge branch 'upstream-fixes' into upstream are found in the git repository at:

Re: [PATCH 2.6.17-rc6-mm1 ] net: RFC 3828-compliant UDP-Lite support

2006-06-08 Thread James Morris
On Thu, 8 Jun 2006, David Miller wrote: Understood. Please, anyone, disregard or un-apply the previous UDP-Lite patch. A revised patch will be prepared and posted as soon as testing permits. Nobody is going to integrate your patch anywhere, don't worry. You make it clear that once you

Re: [PATCH 2.6.17-rc6-mm1 ] net: RFC 3828-compliant UDP-Lite support

2006-06-08 Thread Gerrit Renker
Quoting James Morris: | On Thu, 8 Jun 2006, David Miller wrote: | |Understood. Please, anyone, disregard or un-apply the previous |UDP-Lite patch. A revised patch will be prepared and posted as soon |as testing permits. | | Nobody is going to integrate your patch anywhere,

Re: [PATCH 9/10] Add Vitesse 8244 PHY for MPC8641 HPCN platform.

2006-06-08 Thread Jon Loeliger
On Thu, 2006-06-08 at 14:34, Jeff Garzik wrote: Jon Loeliger wrote: Signed-off-by: Kriston Carson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Signed-off-by: Xianghua Xiao [EMAIL PROTECTED] Signed-off-by: Jon Loeliger [EMAIL PROTECTED] ACK, but patch does not apply to netdev-2.6.git#upstream. Jeff

Re: [PATCH 9/10] Add Vitesse 8244 PHY for MPC8641 HPCN platform.

2006-06-08 Thread Jeff Garzik
Jon Loeliger wrote: On Thu, 2006-06-08 at 14:34, Jeff Garzik wrote: Jon Loeliger wrote: Signed-off-by: Kriston Carson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Signed-off-by: Xianghua Xiao [EMAIL PROTECTED] Signed-off-by: Jon Loeliger [EMAIL PROTECTED] ACK, but patch does not apply to netdev-2.6.git#upstream.

Re: [PATCH 9/10] Add Vitesse 8244 PHY for MPC8641 HPCN platform.

2006-06-08 Thread Jeff Garzik
Jon Loeliger wrote: On Thu, 2006-06-08 at 15:36, Jeff Garzik wrote: Is it dependent on other stuff in Paul's tree? Yes, very much so. Most of this patch set is an entirely new PPC board port against his arch/powerpc basis. The new PHY is incidentally on that board, but the patches for its

Re: [PATCH 9/10] Add Vitesse 8244 PHY for MPC8641 HPCN platform.

2006-06-08 Thread Jon Loeliger
On Thu, 2006-06-08 at 15:36, Jeff Garzik wrote: Is it dependent on other stuff in Paul's tree? Yes, very much so. Most of this patch set is an entirely new PPC board port against his arch/powerpc basis. The new PHY is incidentally on that board, but the patches for its introduction could be

Re: [PATCH 9/10] Add Vitesse 8244 PHY for MPC8641 HPCN platform.

2006-06-08 Thread Jon Loeliger
On Thu, 2006-06-08 at 15:46, Jeff Garzik wrote: I leave it up to you and Paul to coordinate, then :) I'm fine with the patch, and if its better to merge via linuxppc.git, that's OK with me. If you would prefer to send it via my tree, to go ahead and get it in, that's fine too. OK,

Re: Using netconsole for debugging suspend/resume

2006-06-08 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Thursday 08 June 2006 19:50, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: I've been trying to get suspend/resume working well on my new laptop. In general, netconsole has been pretty useful for extracting oopses and other messages, but it is of more limited help in debugging the actual suspend/resume

Re: [PATCH 9/10] Add Vitesse 8244 PHY for MPC8641 HPCN platform.

2006-06-08 Thread Jeff Garzik
Jon Loeliger wrote: On Thu, 2006-06-08 at 15:46, Jeff Garzik wrote: I leave it up to you and Paul to coordinate, then :) I'm fine with the patch, and if its better to merge via linuxppc.git, that's OK with me. If you would prefer to send it via my tree, to go ahead and get it in, that's

Re: New tulip maintainer...

2006-06-08 Thread Valerie Henson
On 6/8/06, Grant Grundler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, Jun 08, 2006 at 11:41:28AM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote: Now that we have a new tulip maintainer, perhaps a resend of the long-outstanding tulip phy patches could be resent? All the tulip patches I have are archived here:

Re: [RFT] Realtek 8168 ethernet support

2006-06-08 Thread Randy.Dunlap
On Thu, 1 Jun 2006 21:02:00 +0100 (BST) Daniel Drake wrote: I've produced this patch which should allow the r8169 driver to work with the new Realtek 8168 chips. These are found in PCI-Express form and onboard some newer motherboards. Does anyone own this hardware? I'm looking for someone

[git patches] net driver fixes

2006-06-08 Thread Jeff Garzik
Just got back from travelling, and am catching up. Thanks to Andrew for working with me via email while I was on the road, he pushed a couple patches already for me. Here are the netdev fixes that were in my 'Pending' folder. I've got a couple libata fixes to push as well, those may not come

[PATCH 8/10] Add Vitesse 8244 PHY for MPC8641 HPCN platform.

2006-06-08 Thread Jon Loeliger
Signed-off-by: Kriston Carson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Signed-off-by: Xianghua Xiao [EMAIL PROTECTED] Signed-off-by: Jon Loeliger [EMAIL PROTECTED] Acked-by: Jeff Garzik [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- drivers/net/Kconfig |6 +- drivers/net/phy/Kconfig |5 ++ drivers/net/phy/Makefile |1

Re: [PATCH 2.6.17-rc6-mm1 ] net: RFC 3828-compliant UDP-Lite support

2006-06-08 Thread David Miller
From: Gerrit Renker [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2006 21:09:33 +0100 That is why I held back regarding the IPv6 port: I can ensure that this (IPv4) code is up to standard and to date, but am lacking the required additional time to implement the same for IPv6. I am trying to contact

[IPV6]: Fix RTNLGRP_IPV6_IFINFO netlink notifications

2006-06-08 Thread Patrick McHardy
[IPV6]: Fix RTNLGRP_IPV6_IFINFO netlink notifications The allocated skb is too small for the message, which results in an EINVAL getting reported to the (innocent) multicast listeners. Signed-off-by: Patrick McHardy [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- commit f71bc8ace692302ad3a80d84b8cbccbb14e88fe5 tree

Re: Netchannels: netchannel vs. socket. 2:0.

2006-06-08 Thread Hans Henrik Happe
On Thursday 08 June 2006 19:15, you wrote: After some enhancements made for netchannel subsystem I'm pleased to announce, that netchannel subsystem outperforms existing layered design both in CPU usage and network speed. Well, after such pretentious introduction I want to cool things down.

netif_tx_disable vs netif_stop_queue (possible races?)

2006-06-08 Thread Daniel Drake
Hi, In order to avoid disconnect races in ZD1211, I'm trying to convince myself that other USB network drivers are race-free (and why). I brought up a possible issue in usbnet with David Brownell, but it appears neither of us are 100% clear on the details, so it would be good to get some

Re: [RFT] Realtek 8168 ethernet support

2006-06-08 Thread Francois Romieu
Randy.Dunlap [EMAIL PROTECTED] : [...] static struct pci_device_id r1000_pci_tbl[] __devinitdata = { { 0x10ec, 0x8169, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0, 0 }, { 0x10ec, 0x8167, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0, 0 }, { 0x10ec, 0x8168, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0, 0 }, { 0x10ec,

Re: [IPV6]: Fix RTNLGRP_IPV6_IFINFO netlink notifications

2006-06-08 Thread YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明
Hello. In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] (at Fri, 09 Jun 2006 00:56:46 +0200), Patrick McHardy [EMAIL PROTECTED] says: Okay, thanks. I think it is better to eliminate these magic numbers. How about this? Signed-off-by: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki [EMAIL PROTECTED] diff --git a/net/ipv6/addrconf.c

Re: [RFT] Realtek 8168 ethernet support

2006-06-08 Thread Jeff Garzik
Randy.Dunlap wrote: Conversely, any reason to use the RealTek r1000 driver? FWIW, RealTek emailed me about merging r1000. I suggested that, if the register sets were similar, that r8169 should be updated instead, to preserve compatibility with existing users (and not lose existing work).

Re: [RFT] Realtek 8168 ethernet support

2006-06-08 Thread Randy.Dunlap
On Thu, 08 Jun 2006 22:40:05 -0400 Jeff Garzik wrote: Randy.Dunlap wrote: Conversely, any reason to use the RealTek r1000 driver? FWIW, RealTek emailed me about merging r1000. I suggested that, if the register sets were similar, that r8169 should be updated instead, to preserve

Re: Using netconsole for debugging suspend/resume

2006-06-08 Thread Andi Kleen
On Thursday 08 June 2006 19:50, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: I've been trying to get suspend/resume working well on my new laptop. In general, netconsole has been pretty useful for extracting oopses and other messages, but it is of more limited help in debugging the actual suspend/resume

Re: Firewall question

2006-06-08 Thread Andi Kleen
Well the DSL modem only transfers whatever data the ISP end sends to it, which in your case is just PPP packets (LCC or LCP I think). No one out on the internet No one out on the internet, but it would be trivial for someone outside his house. All his traffic will be on a long unsecured

[PATCH] wan/sdla section fixes

2006-06-08 Thread Randy.Dunlap
From: Randy Dunlap [EMAIL PROTECTED] Priority: tossup. netdev-set_config can be called at any time, so these references to __initdata would be a real problem. However, problem has not been observed AFAIK. Fix section mismatch warnings: WARNING: drivers/net/wan/sdla.o - Section mismatch:

Re: Using netconsole for debugging suspend/resume

2006-06-08 Thread Jeremy Fitzhardinge
Matt Mackall wrote: That's odd. Netpoll holds a reference to the device, of course, but so does a normal up interface. So that shouldn't be the problem. Another possibility is that outgoing packets from printks in the driver are causing difficulty. Not sure what can be done about that. I only

[PATCH RFC] netpoll: don't spin forever sending to stopped queues

2006-06-08 Thread Jeremy Fitzhardinge
Matt Mackall wrote: That's odd. Netpoll holds a reference to the device, of course, but so does a normal up interface. So that shouldn't be the problem. Another possibility is that outgoing packets from printks in the driver are causing difficulty. Not sure what can be done about that. Here's

Re: Using netconsole for debugging suspend/resume

2006-06-08 Thread Jeremy Fitzhardinge
Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: Please try doing echo 8 /proc/sys/kernel/printk before suspend. Um, why? That would increase the amount of log output, but I don't see how it would help with netconsole preventing suspend, or not being able to see console messages on a blank screen after resume.

Re: netif_tx_disable vs netif_stop_queue (possible races?)

2006-06-08 Thread Herbert Xu
Daniel Drake [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: More specifically, we're talking about drivers/usb/net/usbnet.c and the usbnet_disconnect() function. The race I am highlighting is that usbnet's hard_start_xmit handler (usbnet_start_xmit) may be running when the disconnect happens. Is this a

Re: Fw: [Bugme-new] [Bug 6666] New: invalid tcp socket connection to windows stacks

2006-06-08 Thread Herbert Xu
Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If it's buggy you get : 11:24:15.021572 d59.x-mailer.de.59959 cust.static.212-90-215-40.cybernet.ch.smtp: S 2028538653:2028538653(0) win 5840 mss 1460,sackOK,timestamp 243108498 0,nop,wscale 7 (DF) 11:24:15.076329

Re: [patch 06/17] neighbour.c, pneigh_get_next() skips published entry

2006-06-08 Thread Herbert Xu
Jari Takkala [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have not checked neigh seqfile iterators, the problem may exist in there as well. My patch solves this issue for us, however a more elegant solution would be most welcome. Could the root of the problem be that *pos is off by one when pneigh_get_idx()

Re: Netchannels: netchannel vs. socket. 2:0.

2006-06-08 Thread Evgeniy Polyakov
On Fri, Jun 09, 2006 at 01:00:24AM +0200, Hans Henrik Happe ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: On Thursday 08 June 2006 19:15, you wrote: After some enhancements made for netchannel subsystem I'm pleased to announce, that netchannel subsystem outperforms existing layered design both in CPU usage

  1   2   >