Hi Trent:
Thanks for your good work. Here are the comments for your first patch.
I won't comment on the second patch since others have already looked
through it and I don't know enough about SELINUX to be of much help.
On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 02:21:15PM -0400, jaegert wrote:
+static inline
Hi,
Against latest net-2.6.14, but should apply to other versions as well. Please
apply.
diff-tree b13ca94bb73c79cbc1b34c4261b02c3df934498a (from
c097bee59e15d4703e53b8c21d9e9ce5da9365bc)
Author: Balazs Scheidler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat Aug 13 16:24:25 2005 +0200
As discussed
On Sat, Aug 13, 2005 at 03:20:06AM +0200, Patrick McHardy wrote:
Harald Welte wrote:
Just send two incremental patches to Dave.
Here they are. The first patch fixes the div64_64 function, the second
one renames some constants.
Ok, just in case Dave was waiting for my comments (which are
On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 12:09:04PM -0700, David S. Miller wrote:
From: Harald Welte [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2005 21:03:43 +0200
Ok, I hope everyone is fine with this patch:
It is, but I did not add the connbytes patch into my tree so I can't
use this patch as-is. That's why
This time without the ipt_connbytes hunk:
--
- Harald Welte [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://netfilter.org/
Fragmentation is like classful addressing -- an interesting early
architectural error that shows
On Sat, Aug 13, 2005 at 03:20:09PM +0530, Anand SVR wrote:
Hi,
While browsing through the code, I encountered instances in
ipv4/netfilter where checksum related calls are made in ip_nat_core.c
and other files. Wondering if netfilter should be made aware of tso so
that the checksum operation
Harald,
Thanks a lot for the clarification. If NAT for non-locally generated
packets means no TSO possible, then we are not including all those
large base of private-addressed TSO-enabled LAN hosts from taking its
benefits. The NAT box in fact would be handling load from many local
hosts and
From: Patrick McHardy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] add new iptables ipt_connbytes match
Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2005 03:20:06 +0200
Harald Welte wrote:
Just send two incremental patches to Dave.
Here they are. The first patch fixes the div64_64 function, the second
one renames some
From: Harald Welte [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2005 16:51:57 +0200
Ok, just in case Dave was waiting for my comments (which are usually
not required since Patricks patches tend to have a higher quality than
mine):
ACK-ed-by: Harald Welte [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I like to see ACKs,
From: Harald Welte [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2005 18:06:21 +0200
TSO can only happen for locally-generated packets, am I right?
That is correct.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe netdev in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at
From: Herbert Xu [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2005 11:32:39 +1000
I actually had a play with the fast clone stuff. However, eventually
I gave up because of this dilemma: I needed to either introduce an extra
atomic op on the __kfree_skb path, or add bloat to the inlined kfree_skb
From: Harald Welte [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2005 16:50:23 +0200
So for new development, I'm now more inclined to push things sooner to
you - even more for code that only adds new featurss. If you generally
dislike that, please let me know.
I think this is the way to go.
-
To
From: Harald Welte [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2005 17:46:19 +0200
[NETFILTER] Add new iptables connbytes match
Applied.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe netdev in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at
From: Harald Welte [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2005 17:45:34 +0200
[NETFILTER] introduce and use aligned_u64 data type
Applied.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe netdev in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at
David S. Miller wrote:
Here is the current patch. It dies on the destruction of the
first TCP socket, while pruning the write queue of the socket,
so something is very wrong in the implementation, I just haven't
had a chance to fully debug it yet.
First thing I'd try is to remove the ! from
From: Tommy Christensen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: skb-pkt_type
Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2005 00:20:28 +0200
David S. Miller wrote:
Here is the current patch. It dies on the destruction of the
first TCP socket, while pruning the write queue of the socket,
so something is very wrong in the
* David S. Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-08-13 14:10
From: Herbert Xu [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2005 11:32:39 +1000
I actually had a play with the fast clone stuff. However, eventually
I gave up because of this dilemma: I needed to either introduce an extra
atomic op on the
17 matches
Mail list logo