Re: [PATCH 2.6.18] WE-21 support (core API)

2006-09-01 Thread Johannes Berg
On Thu, 2006-08-31 at 10:12 -0700, Jean Tourrilhes wrote: And I strongly disagree with your disagrement ;-) You're of course free to do that :) But let me explain. I'm sorry to say it like this, but I hope my work will not be impacted by vaporware. How many drivers are currently

Re: [PATCH 2.6.18] WE-21 support (core API)

2006-09-01 Thread Johannes Berg
On Thu, 2006-08-31 at 19:57 +0200, Michael Buesch wrote: It is. Nobody says different. I think with mainline Johannes meant the wireless-dev tree. Merging nl80211 with softmac would indeed not make sense to me, too. Actually, I do say different. I want softmac to be a consumer of nl80211 too,

Re: [PATCH 2/2]d80211: add hardware scan callback

2006-09-01 Thread Hong Liu
On Fri, 2006-09-01 at 14:41, Johannes Berg wrote: On Fri, 2006-09-01 at 11:37 +0800, Hong Liu wrote: + local-sta_scanning = 1; + if (local-hw-hw_scan) + return local-hw-hw_scan(dev, ssid, ssid_len); + My question still stands, is it proper to assign sta_scanning

[PATCH] neigh_table_clear() doesn't free stats

2006-09-01 Thread Kirill Korotaev
neigh_table_clear() doesn't free tbl-stats. Found by Alexey Kuznetsov. Though Alexey considers this leak minor for mainstream, I still believe that cleanup code should not forget to free some of the resources :) At least, this is critical for OpenVZ with virtualized neighbour tables.

Re: [PATCH] neigh_table_clear() doesn't free stats

2006-09-01 Thread David Miller
From: Kirill Korotaev [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 01 Sep 2006 12:28:56 +0400 neigh_table_clear() doesn't free tbl-stats. Found by Alexey Kuznetsov. Though Alexey considers this leak minor for mainstream, I still believe that cleanup code should not forget to free some of the resources :)

Re: high latency with TCP connections

2006-09-01 Thread David Miller
From: Pekka Savola [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2006 12:44:48 +0300 (EEST) On Thu, 31 Aug 2006, David Miller wrote: ... Probably, aspect 1 of ABC just should be disabled. And the first my suggestion looks working too. I'm ready to rip out ABC entirely, to be honest. Or at least

[patch 0/4] ip_vs_ftp cleanups

2006-09-01 Thread Horms
Hi, This series of four patches has several minor cleanups for the options to the ip_vs_ftp modules. -- Horms H: http://www.vergenet.net/~horms/ W: http://www.valinux.co.jp/en/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe netdev in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[patch 3/4] Make sure ip_vs_ftp ports are valid

2006-09-01 Thread Horms
I'm not entirely sure what happens in the case of a valid port, at best it'll be silently ignored. This patch ignores them a little more verbosely. Signed-Off-By: Simon Horman [EMAIL PROTECTED] Index: linux-2.6/net/ipv4/ipvs/ip_vs_ftp.c

[patch 1/4] Document the ports option to ip_vs_ftp in kernel-parameters.txt

2006-09-01 Thread Horms
I'm not sure if documenting this here is appropriate, but if it is, here is some text to put there. Signed-Off-By: Simon Horman [EMAIL PROTECTED] Index: linux-2.6/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt === ---

[patch 4/4] remove the debug option go ip_vs_ftp

2006-09-01 Thread Horms
This patch makes the debuging behaviour of this code more consistent with the rest of IPVS. Signed-Off-By: Simon Horman [EMAIL PROTECTED] Index: linux-2.6/net/ipv4/ipvs/ip_vs_ftp.c === --- linux-2.6.orig/net/ipv4/ipvs/ip_vs_ftp.c

[patch 2/4] auto-help for ip_vs_ftp

2006-09-01 Thread Horms
Fill in a help message for the ports option to ip_vs_ftp Signed-Off-By: Simon Horman [EMAIL PROTECTED] Index: linux-2.6/net/ipv4/ipvs/ip_vs_ftp.c === --- linux-2.6.orig/net/ipv4/ipvs/ip_vs_ftp.c2006-09-01 19:02:38.0

Re: Unable to halt or reboot due to - unregister_netdevice: waiting for eth0.20 to become free. Usage count = 1

2006-09-01 Thread Jesper Juhl
On 31/08/06, Jesper Juhl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 31/08/06, Ben Greear [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Jesper Juhl wrote: Hi, I've got a small problem with 2.6.18-rc5-git2. I've got a vlan setup on eth0.20, eth0 does not have an IP. When I attempt to reboot or halt the machine I get

Re: Unable to halt or reboot due to - unregister_netdevice: waiting for eth0.20 to become free. Usage count = 1

2006-09-01 Thread Herbert Xu
Jesper Juhl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've just encountered the problem on a different server with an identical vlan setup. That server is running 2.6.13.4 Do you have a simple recipe to reproduce this? Ideally it'd be a script that anyone can execute in a freshly booted system that exhibits

Re: Unable to halt or reboot due to - unregister_netdevice: waiting for eth0.20 to become free. Usage count = 1

2006-09-01 Thread Jesper Juhl
On 01/09/06, Herbert Xu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Jesper Juhl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've just encountered the problem on a different server with an identical vlan setup. That server is running 2.6.13.4 Do you have a simple recipe to reproduce this? Ideally it'd be a script that anyone can

Re: high latency with TCP connections

2006-09-01 Thread Evgeniy Polyakov
On Fri, Sep 01, 2006 at 01:47:15PM +0400, Alexey Kuznetsov ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Hello! problem. The problem is really at the receiver because we only ACK every other full sized frame. I had the idea to ACK every 2 frames, regardless of size, This would solve lots of problems.

Re: [PATCH 0/7] 8139cp: misc minor changes

2006-09-01 Thread Francois Romieu
Pierre Ossman [EMAIL PROTECTED] : Ehm... why am I included in this? :) To preserve an happy 8139cp user :o) -- Ueimor - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe netdev in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at

Re: [PATCH 0/7] 8139cp: misc minor changes

2006-09-01 Thread Pierre Ossman
Francois Romieu wrote: Pierre Ossman [EMAIL PROTECTED] : Ehm... why am I included in this? :) To preserve an happy 8139cp user :o) A noble endeavor. Carry on. ;) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe netdev in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Unable to halt or reboot due to - unregister_netdevice: waiting for eth0.20 to become free. Usage count = 1

2006-09-01 Thread Jesper Juhl
On 01/09/06, Jesper Juhl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 01/09/06, Herbert Xu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Jesper Juhl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've just encountered the problem on a different server with an identical vlan setup. That server is running 2.6.13.4 Do you have a simple recipe to

Re: [RFC][IPSEC]: tunnel mode processing

2006-09-01 Thread jamal
On Fri, 2006-01-09 at 14:07 +1000, Herbert Xu wrote: On Thu, Aug 31, 2006 at 08:55:27PM -0400, jamal wrote: Would it be reasonable to do a check so that incase a skb-dst doesnt exist, the inner headers values can be used i.e something along xfrm4_tunnel_output():: If you didn't care

Re: [RFC][IPSEC]: tunnel mode processing

2006-09-01 Thread Herbert Xu
On Fri, Sep 01, 2006 at 08:17:14AM -0400, jamal wrote: In the case of traffic generation, if i could shave even more cycles the better since i want to generate high speed. In this case the cycles would be in creating a fake dst and attaching it some fake values. Right, you're testing the

Re: [GENL]: Provide more information to userspace about registered genl families

2006-09-01 Thread Johannes Berg
On Fri, 2006-09-01 at 08:22 -0400, jamal wrote: Seems you may be talking about capabilities more than filtering? yes, I had sort of thought filtering would be that, but now that you say it I get the point :) Sorry, I havent had time to look at that code (is it in Daves tree?); No, it's not

Re: [RFC][IPSEC]: tunnel mode processing

2006-09-01 Thread jamal
On Fri, 2006-01-09 at 22:22 +1000, Herbert Xu wrote: Right, you're testing the receiver side. both in/out sides (on the receiver); i just count and drop all packets coming back to the sender (the pktgenerator) In that case I suggest that you replicate the IPsec transport mode logic in the

Re: [GENL]: Provide more information to userspace about registered genl families

2006-09-01 Thread jamal
On Fri, 2006-01-09 at 14:25 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote: On Fri, 2006-09-01 at 08:22 -0400, jamal wrote: Sorry, I havent had time to look at that code (is it in Daves tree?); No, it's not in any tree yet. Could you point me to it? I can look at it over the weekend. if i understand

Re: [RFC][IPSEC]: tunnel mode processing

2006-09-01 Thread Herbert Xu
On Fri, Sep 01, 2006 at 08:56:18AM -0400, jamal wrote: Thats one idea i havent thought of. i.e the code would look like: - if (mode == tunnel) err = mytunneloutput (x, skb); else err = x-mode-output(x, skb); if (err)

Re: [PATCH] change netfilter tunables to __read_mostly

2006-09-01 Thread Patrick McHardy
Brian Haley wrote: Change some netfilter tunables to __read_mostly. Also fixed some incorrect file reference comments while I was in there. Please send these kind of patches for netfilter to me so I can make sure they don't clash with other pending patches. (this will be my last

Re: [PATCH 2.6.18] WE-21 support (core API)

2006-09-01 Thread Jean Tourrilhes
On Fri, Sep 01, 2006 at 08:54:00AM +0200, Johannes Berg wrote: On Thu, 2006-08-31 at 10:12 -0700, Jean Tourrilhes wrote: And I strongly disagree with your disagrement ;-) You're of course free to do that :) But let me explain. And my explanation is even more simple : let's not

Re: [PATCH] change netfilter tunables to __read_mostly

2006-09-01 Thread Patrick McHardy
Patrick McHardy wrote: Brian Haley wrote: Change some netfilter tunables to __read_mostly. Also fixed some incorrect file reference comments while I was in there. Please send these kind of patches for netfilter to me so I can make sure they don't clash with other pending patches.

Re: [PATCH] change netfilter tunables to __read_mostly

2006-09-01 Thread Brian Haley
Patrick McHardy wrote: Patrick McHardy wrote: Brian Haley wrote: Change some netfilter tunables to __read_mostly. Also fixed some incorrect file reference comments while I was in there. Please send these kind of patches for netfilter to me so I can make sure they don't clash with other

[RFC] Patch to add board revision to the WLAN chip_id printout

2006-09-01 Thread Larry Finger
Michael, This patch includes the board revision in the chip_id printk for the ssb version of bcm43xx-d80211 and is meant to be applied to wireless-dev. As we have seen, behavior of the chips can be dependent on the rev level, thus a need to have it in the log. Signed-off-by: Larry Finger

Re: [PATCH 2.6.17 0/9] NetXen: 1G/10G Ethernet Driver

2006-09-01 Thread Pradeep Dalvi
Hi, This entire patch is available at, http://www.netxen.com/products/downloads/netxen-2.6.17.patch.zip Thanks, pradeep On Thu, 31 Aug 2006, Amit S. Kale wrote: Hi All, Thank you Stephen, Don and Wendy. We have incorporated feedbacks which have received since after last post. I'll be

[IPV6]: Fix tclass setting for raw sockets.

2006-09-01 Thread YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明
Hello. Following patch is for linux-2.6. I think it is appropriate to push this to -stable. --- [IPV6]: Fix tclass setting for raw sockets. np-cork.tclass is used only in cork'ed context. Otherwise, np-tclass should be used. Bug#7096 reported by Remi Denis-Courmont [EMAIL PROTECTED].

[PATCH 2/8] address: Convert address deletion to new netlink api

2006-09-01 Thread Thomas Graf
Signed-off-by: Thomas Graf [EMAIL PROTECTED] Index: net-2.6.19/net/ipv6/addrconf.c === --- net-2.6.19.orig/net/ipv6/addrconf.c 2006-09-01 23:15:14.0 +0200 +++ net-2.6.19/net/ipv6/addrconf.c 2006-09-01 23:15:18.0

[PATCH 5/8] address: Add put_ifaddrmsg() and rt_scope()

2006-09-01 Thread Thomas Graf
Signed-off-by: Thomas Graf [EMAIL PROTECTED] Index: net-2.6.19/net/ipv6/addrconf.c === --- net-2.6.19.orig/net/ipv6/addrconf.c 2006-09-01 23:15:21.0 +0200 +++ net-2.6.19/net/ipv6/addrconf.c 2006-09-01 23:15:22.0

[PATCH 8/8] address: Support NLM_F_EXCL when adding addresses

2006-09-01 Thread Thomas Graf
iproute2 doesn't provide the NLM_F_CREATE flag when adding addresses, it is assumed to be implied. The existing code issues a check on said flag when the modify operation fails (likely due to ENOENT) before continueing to create it, this leads to a hard to predict result, therefore the

[PATCH 7/8] address: Allow address changes while device is administrative down

2006-09-01 Thread Thomas Graf
Same behaviour as IPv4, using IFF_UP is a no-no anyway. Signed-off-by: Thomas Graf [EMAIL PROTECTED] Index: net-2.6.19/net/ipv6/addrconf.c === --- net-2.6.19.orig/net/ipv6/addrconf.c 2006-09-01 23:15:24.0 +0200 +++

[PATCH 6/8] address: Convert address dumping to new netlink api

2006-09-01 Thread Thomas Graf
Replaces INET6_IFADDR_RTA_SPACE with a new function calculating the total required message size for all address messages. Signed-off-by: Thomas Graf [EMAIL PROTECTED] Index: net-2.6.19/net/ipv6/addrconf.c === ---

[PATCH] sky2: more pci device id's

2006-09-01 Thread Stephen Hemminger
Some more Marvell device id's, these are from the latest SysKonnect vendor driver version of sk98lin (8.36). Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- drivers/net/sky2.c |3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) --- sky2.orig/drivers/net/sky2.c2006-09-01

[PATCH 0/7] bonding: Miscellaneous small fixes

2006-09-01 Thread Jay Vosburgh
Patch 1: Add 10 Gig support Patch 2: Convert delay value from s16 to int Patch 3: Format fix in seq_printf call Patch 4: Remove unneeded NULL test Patch 5: Handle large hard_header_len Patch 6: Add priv_flag to avoid event mishandling Patch

[PATCH 2/7] bonding: Convert delay value from s16 to int

2006-09-01 Thread Jay Vosburgh
From: Kenzo Iwami [EMAIL PROTECTED] The value of downdelay/miimon and updelay/miimon are stored in slave-delay. The type of downdelay, updelay, and miimon are all int. However, slave-delay is type short, and it is not possible to store the value of downdelay/miimon or updelay/miimon in some

[PATCH 1/7] bonding: Add 10 Gig support

2006-09-01 Thread Jay Vosburgh
Allow channel bonding to enslave a 10 Gig adapter without errors. Signed-off-by: Mitch Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] Acked-by: Jay Vosburgh [EMAIL PROTECTED] diff -urpN -X linux-2.6.18-rc4-clean/Documentation/dontdiff linux-2.6.18-rc4-clean/drivers/net/bonding/bond_3ad.c

[PATCH 3/7] bonding: Format fix in seq_printf call

2006-09-01 Thread Jay Vosburgh
From: Kenzo Iwami [EMAIL PROTECTED] Though link_failure_count is type unsigned int, this value is outputted to /proc/net/bonding/bondX file using %d instead of %u. The attached patch fixes this problem. Signed-off-by: Kenzo Iwami [EMAIL PROTECTED] Acked-by: Jay Vosburgh [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[PATCH 4/7] bonding: Remove unneeded NULL test

2006-09-01 Thread Jay Vosburgh
Remove unneeded test for NULL. Reported by Thomas Dillig [EMAIL PROTECTED] and Isil Dillig [EMAIL PROTECTED] via Stephen Hemminger [EMAIL PROTECTED]. Signed-off-by: Jay Vosburgh [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- netdev-2.6.git-upstream/drivers/net/bonding/bond_sysfs.c2006/08/19 10:22:17 1.1 +++

Re: [PATCH 2.6.18] WE-21 support (core API)

2006-09-01 Thread Jean Tourrilhes
On Fri, Sep 01, 2006 at 08:55:48PM +0200, Michael Buesch wrote: Note that one thing that worry me with your approach is footprint. I've used various embedded devices over the years, such as the Gumstix (4MB Flash), and this is why WE was optimised for footprint. Can you please

[PATCH 5/7] bonding: Handle large hard_header_len

2006-09-01 Thread Jay Vosburgh
The bonding driver fails to adjust its hard_header_len when enslaving interfaces. Whenever an interface with a hard_header_len greater than the ETH_HLEN default is enslaved, the potential for an oops exists, and if the oops happens while responding to an arp request, for example, the system

[PATCH 6/7] bonding: Add priv_flag to avoid event mishandling

2006-09-01 Thread Jay Vosburgh
Add priv_flag to specifically identify bonding-involved devices. Needed because IFF_MASTER is an unreliable identifier (vlan interfaces above bonding will inherit IFF_MASTER). Misidentification of devices would cause notifier events for other devices to be erroneously processed by bonding,

[PATCH 7/7] bonding: Don't release slaves when master is admin down

2006-09-01 Thread Jay Vosburgh
From: jamal [EMAIL PROTECTED] When a bonding netdevice is admin-ed down it loses the slaves attributes (set via ifenslave). This is not consistent with other behavior of netdevices (example a qdisc attached to a netdevice doesnt disappear or an attached IP address etc). The included patch fixes

TCP send/ack lockstep problem

2006-09-01 Thread Matthias Urlichs
Hello, I have a problem with a TCP connection here which just doesn't want to have multiple packets on the wire. I have verified that the sender has enough buffered data (netstat -t shows 8..10k send buffer). There's no packet loss. The tcpdump (attached) shows that the receiver increases its

Re: [PATCH 2.6.18] WE-21 support (core API)

2006-09-01 Thread Ulrich Kunitz
On 06-09-01 20:55 Michael Buesch wrote: The real problem with WE is, as I previously said, the ill-defined semantics of both the user-space API and the in-kernel API. I don't understand why you say it's ill defined, it 100% documented in the iwconfig man page. It is

Re: [PATCH 0/7] bonding: Miscellaneous small fixes

2006-09-01 Thread Jeff Garzik
Jay Vosburgh wrote: Patch 1: Add 10 Gig support Patch 2: Convert delay value from s16 to int Patch 3: Format fix in seq_printf call Patch 4: Remove unneeded NULL test Patch 5: Handle large hard_header_len Patch 6: Add priv_flag to avoid event

Re: [RFC] Patch to add board revision to the WLAN chip_id printout

2006-09-01 Thread Michael Buesch
On Friday 01 September 2006 17:28, Larry Finger wrote: Michael, This patch includes the board revision in the chip_id printk for the ssb version of bcm43xx-d80211 and is meant to be applied to wireless-dev. As we have seen, behavior of the chips can be dependent on the rev level, thus

[RFC] sky2: fragmented DMA

2006-09-01 Thread Stephen Hemminger
I modified the sky2 driver to do fragmented receive for large MTU. The hardware supports breaking receive into chunks, so this version allocates some header space in the skb data up to two pages (assuming 4K page size) for the extra data. It doesn't go into fragmented mode until it thinks the

[PATCH]: ethtool: typo fix for e1000

2006-09-01 Thread Auke Kok
e1000: Typo fix. Signed-off-by: Auke Kok [EMAIL PROTECTED] diff --git a/e1000.c b/e1000.c index 6de27ca..6741323 100644 --- a/e1000.c +++ b/e1000.c @@ -372,7 +372,7 @@ e1000_dump_regs(struct ethtool_drvinfo * Descriptor minimum threshold size: %s\n Broadcast accept mode:

[PATCH 0/5] skge update

2006-09-01 Thread Stephen Hemminger
This set fixes several races and performance problems related to bug reports. -- VGER BF report: H 0.437515 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe netdev in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[PATCH 2/5] skge: irq lock race

2006-09-01 Thread Stephen Hemminger
The driver needs to access the IRQ status inside of lock to avoid races with other places changing IRQ mask etc. This may be related to some of the SMP bugs reported against skge in kernel bugzilla. Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- netdev-2.6.orig/drivers/net/skge.c +++

[PATCH 3/5] skge: use NAPI for transmit complete

2006-09-01 Thread Stephen Hemminger
The skge driver has much better performance if transmit done is handled in NAPI softirq. Change from doing transmit locking in driver (LLTX) and use device lock. Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- netdev-2.6.orig/drivers/net/skge.c +++ netdev-2.6/drivers/net/skge.c @@ -91,7

[PATCH 4/5] skge: version 1.8

2006-09-01 Thread Stephen Hemminger
Because of the NAPI and other SMP fixes, let's call this a version. Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- skge-2.6.orig/drivers/net/skge.c +++ skge-2.6/drivers/net/skge.c @@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ #include skge.h #define DRV_NAME skge -#define DRV_VERSION

[PATCH 5/5] skge: pci_post bugs

2006-09-01 Thread Stephen Hemminger
There are several places where this driver needs to ensure that PCI accesses have completed before releasing locks. These maybe related to the problem (not verified): http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6142 Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---

[PATCH 1/5] skge: use netdev_alloc_skb

2006-09-01 Thread Stephen Hemminger
Change to use new netdev_alloc_skb interface for 2.6.18. Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- skge-2.6.orig/drivers/net/skge.c +++ skge-2.6/drivers/net/skge.c @@ -818,8 +818,9 @@ static void skge_rx_clean(struct skge_po /* Allocate buffers for receive ring * For receive:

Re: i not find in the kernel code the code of this command

2006-09-01 Thread Ian McDonald
On 9/2/06, Franco [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I thought that this code was police.c but seem that it isn't i must implement a proc file in the code and recompiling the kernel. I'm not sure I understand your question. Please tell me if I answer wrong! The code is under net/sched in the source

Re: [PATCH 2.6.18] WE-21 support (core API)

2006-09-01 Thread Michael Buesch
On Saturday 02 September 2006 00:10, Jean Tourrilhes wrote: On Fri, Sep 01, 2006 at 08:55:48PM +0200, Michael Buesch wrote: Note that one thing that worry me with your approach is footprint. I've used various embedded devices over the years, such as the Gumstix (4MB Flash), and this

Re: i not find in the kernel code the code of this command

2006-09-01 Thread Franco
thanks for your response! Yes, The code is under net/sched in the source tree. The file act_police.c in the directoy net/sched don't exist. there is police.c that have a very similar code act_police.c (that i have found on internet) however i have doon 'make menuconfig', i have gone to

Re: icmp echo reply and DF

2006-09-01 Thread Herbert Xu
Marco Berizzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I kindly would like to know why linux reply to ICMP echo request packets with the DF bit set always to 0. We do that because that's the only sensible thing to do if you actually want ICMP messages to reach the destination host. PMTU on ICMP does not make

Re: TCP send/ack lockstep problem

2006-09-01 Thread Herbert Xu
Matthias Urlichs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Any ideas? Is the sending program doing something stupid? If so, what? Probably. Since you're on the sender's side (192.109.x.x I presume) why don't you do a strace on the sending process and tell us? Cheers, -- Visit Openswan at

Re: e1000 Detected Tx Unit Hang

2006-09-01 Thread Auke Kok
Paul Aviles wrote: I am getting e1000: eth0: e1000_clean_tx_irq: Detected Tx Unit Hang using stock 2.6.17.11, 2.6.17.5 or 2.6.17.4 kernels on centos 4.3. The server is a Tyan GS10 and is connected to a Netgear GS724T Gig switch. I can easily reproduce the problem by trying to do a large ftp

Re: TCP send/ack lockstep problem

2006-09-01 Thread Matthias Urlichs
Hi, Herbert Xu: Matthias Urlichs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Any ideas? Is the sending program doing something stupid? If so, what? Probably. Since you're on the sender's side (192.109.x.x I presume) why don't you do a strace on the sending process and tell us? The stuff I see in there