Hi,
Is there a chance that this, or a patch with similar spirit (e.g. a way
to send packets from non-local IP addresses) could be merged?
On Fri, 2007-06-01 at 02:18 +0300, Julian Anastasov wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Thu, 31 May 2007, KOVACS Krisztian wrote:
>
> > So what about this one?
>
Hi,
I would like to easily match a set of dynamically created interfaces
from my packet filter rules. The attached patch forms the basis of my
implementation and I would like to know whether something like this is
mergeable to mainline.
The use-case is as follows:
* I have two different subsyste
On Tue, 2006-08-01 at 21:18 +0200, Sven Schuster wrote:
> Hi Phil,
>
> On Tue, Aug 01, 2006 at 11:46:55AM -0700, Phil Oester told us:
> > Since in this scenario userspace is able to determine ppp vs pptp,
> > could you not also do something like have an inbound_ppp and inbound_pptp
> > chain, the
On Tue, 2006-08-01 at 11:29 -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Tue, 01 Aug 2006 19:10:09 +0200
> Balazs Scheidler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I would like to easily match a set of dynamically created interfaces
> > from my packet fil
On Wed, 2006-08-02 at 21:08 -0700, Stephen J. Bevan wrote:
> Balazs Scheidler writes:
> > I would like to easily match a set of dynamically created interfaces
> > from my packet filter rules. The attached patch forms the basis of my
> > implementation and I would like to k
On Fri, 2006-08-04 at 12:06 +0200, Patrick McHardy wrote:
> Balazs Scheidler wrote:
> > The use-case is as follows:
> >
> > * I have two different subsystems creating interfaces dynamically (for
> > example pptpd and serial pppd lines, each creating dynamic pppX
>
On Wed, 2007-11-21 at 01:25 +0100, Patrick McHardy wrote:
> David Miller wrote:
> > From: Laszlo Attila Toth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2007 14:52:12 +0100
> >
> >> Jan Engelhardt írta:
> >>> On Nov 20 2007 14:14, Laszlo Attila Toth wrote:
> This is the 6th version of our inte
Some more investigation revealed that the cassini driver leaks the data
portion of all RXed packets, this makes the driver completely unusable.
We've tested the following combinations:
* 2.6.17 (patched, but no cassini related patches)
* 2.6.22 Ubuntu Gutsy.
It still worked in 2.6.12 where we o
On Fri, 2008-01-04 at 00:32 -0800, David Miller wrote:
> Over the past day I've put together the following set of bug fixes for
> the Cassini driver.
>
> At least with my setup it appears to basically work fine, not leak
> memory, and the SKB BUG messages go away too.
>
> I'll be honest and say
On Wed, 2007-01-10 at 07:46 +0100, Patrick McHardy wrote:
> KOVACS Krisztian wrote:
> > + rth->u.dst.lastuse = jiffies;
> > + dst_hold(&rth->u.dst);
> > + rth->u.dst.__use++;
> > + RT_CACHE_STAT_INC(in_hit);
> > +
gle unsigned int value and no pointers.
A possible fix below can be found at the end of this mail.
Signed-off-by: Balazs Scheidler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c
+++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c
@@ -571,6 +571,9 @@ int xfrm_policy_delete(struct xfrm_polic
int xfrm_sk_policy_inse
> Hi,
>
> I'm attaching a small testprogram which tries to install an
> XFRM_POLICY_FWD, and I confirmed with a printk that the value of 2 is
> successfully propagated to xfrm_sk_policy_insert().
test program originally missed, here it is this time.
--
Bazsi
#include
#include
#include
#incl
Hi,
Commit log says it all.
Signed-off-by: Balazs Scheidler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
diff-tree a262e285077cb1604c25c5de99d71bbf739823e2 (from
684a28105211367d9040ee945cead597912cc49e)
Author: Balazs Scheidler <[EMAIL PROTECTED](none)>
Date: Sun Aug 7 20:23:59 2005 +0200
As disc
Sent to myself the first time.
> >
> >
> > @@ -1097,6 +1097,8 @@ void __init xfrm_state_init(void)
> > {
> > int i;
> >
> > + xfrm_state_bydst = (struct list_head *)
> > __get_free_pages(GFP_KERNEL, get_order(sizeof(struct list_head) *
> > XFRM_DST_HSIZE * 2));
> > + xfr
On Mon, 2005-08-08 at 16:27 +0200, Balazs Scheidler wrote:
> Is this tiny patchlet worth the trouble of changing
> xfrm_init/xfrm_state_init to return int, and do error checking from
> ip_rt_init() ?
I've attached a revised patch, this time with complete error checking, and
propaga
On Thu, 2005-08-11 at 22:31 +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
> Balazs Scheidler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > I've attached a revised patch, this time with complete error checking, and
> > propagating the error code to the caller. Please apply.
>
> Sorry, but
On Thu, 2005-08-11 at 14:44 +0200, Balazs Scheidler wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-08-11 at 22:31 +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
> > Balazs Scheidler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > I've attached a revised patch, this time with complete error checking,
> > &g
Hi,
Against latest net-2.6.14, but should apply to other versions as well. Please
apply.
diff-tree b13ca94bb73c79cbc1b34c4261b02c3df934498a (from
c097bee59e15d4703e53b8c21d9e9ce5da9365bc)
Author: Balazs Scheidler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat Aug 13 16:24:25 2005 +0200
As dis
On Tue, 2006-01-31 at 00:22 +0100, Harald Welte wrote:
> ---
> commit 94d3d40c84672b74e59ea5252f61602610e1513e
> tree 63e5ae5174af9f982be6d8d1bbe11e750e4ace32
> parent e3c7a1f99300fbd6de35a40fcd9c4dc1b0fbfee2
> author Harald Welte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Fri, 27 Jan 2006 16:03:45 +0100
> committer Har
19 matches
Mail list logo