On 2018/12/05 16:57, Nicolas Belouin wrote:
[...]
>
> Thanks for your help, using your debug patch I got the value of
> needed_headroom:
> USHRT_MAX - 64
> And tracked it down to a legacy out of tree patch of ours I then fixed.
> The patch was increasing/decreasing the needed_headroom without
On 2018/12/04 11:52, Nicolas Belouin wrote:
> On 03/12 07:59, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 12/03/2018 07:20 AM, Nicolas Belouin wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > I ran into a panic while adding an interface to a bridge with a vxlan
> > > interface already attached to it, as it seems related mtu=9000.
On 2018/09/13 15:31, Jesse Brandeburg wrote:
[...]
>
> ---
> v1: initial RFC
>
> Jesse Brandeburg (14):
> intel-ethernet: rename i40evf to iavf
Seems like patch 1 didn't make it to netdev
https://lists.osuosl.org/pipermail/intel-wired-lan/Week-of-Mon-20180910/014025.html
> iavf: diet and
101 - 103 of 103 matches
Mail list logo