On Tue, Sep 26, 2006 at 06:15:21PM +0200, Patrick McHardy wrote:
Patrick McHardy wrote:
jamal wrote:
Yes, that looks plausible. Can you try making those changes and see if
the warning is gone?
I think this points to a bigger brokeness caused by the move of
dev-qdisc to
=
[ INFO: inconsistent lock state ]
-
inconsistent {softirq-on-R} - {in-softirq-W} usage.
swapper/0 [HC0[0]:SC1[2]:HE1:SE0] takes:
(police_lock){-+--}, at: [f8d304fd] tcf_police_destroy+0x24/0x8f [act_police]
{softirq-on-R} state
On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 10:28:38AM -0700, Kok, Auke wrote:
Refine cb cleaning debug printout and print out all cleaned cbs' status. Add
debug flag for EEPROM csum failures that were overridden by the user.
Signed-off-by: Jesse Brandeburg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Signed-off-by: Auke Kok
On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 05:40:34PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
Dave Jones wrote:
On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 10:28:38AM -0700, Kok, Auke wrote:
+ add_taint(TAINT_MACHINE_CHECK);
I object to this flag being abused this way.
A corrupt EEPROM on a network card has
Seen during boot of a 2.6.18rc5-git1 based kernel.
Dave
===
[ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]
2.6.17-1.2608.fc6 #1
---
swapper/0 is trying to acquire
On Tue, Aug 15, 2006 at 03:25:58PM -0400, Pavel Roskin wrote:
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/orinoco.h b/drivers/net/wireless/orinoco.h
index 16db3e1..8fd9b32 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/orinoco.h
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/orinoco.h
@@ -135,11 +135,9 @@ extern irqreturn_t
On Wed, Aug 09, 2006 at 09:04:38PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
From: Dave Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2006 22:21:16 -0400
config.h is automatically included by kbuild these days.
Signed-off-by: Dave Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Applied to net-2.6.19, thanks Dave
We've just added an implicit declaration in the latest tree..
net/ipx/af_ipx.c: In function 'ipx_rcv':
net/ipx/af_ipx.c:1648: error: implicit declaration of function 'ipxhdr'
(Yes, my builds fail on -Werror-implicit, so that things like this get caught
early)
Probably something simple like a
config.h is automatically included by kbuild these days.
Signed-off-by: Dave Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- linux-2.6/net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_conntrack_sip.c~2006-08-09
22:18:48.0 -0400
+++ linux-2.6/net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_conntrack_sip.c 2006-08-09
22:18:53.0 -0400
@@ -8,7
From a recent rc3-git kernel.
Dave
--
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
---BeginMessage---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201560
On Thu, Aug 03, 2006 at 03:11:53PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
Could we please just get rid of the wireless extensions over netlink code
again? It doesn't help to solve anything and just creates a bigger mess
to untangle when switching to a fully fledged wireless stack.
If we're going
On Thu, Aug 03, 2006 at 11:58:00AM -0700, Jean Tourrilhes wrote:
On Thu, Aug 03, 2006 at 03:11:53PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Thu, Aug 03, 2006 at 11:54:41PM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
Arjan van de Ven [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
this is another one of those nasty buggers;
Wow. Nearly 400 lines of debug spew, from a simple 'ifup eth1'.
Dave
ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): eth1: link is not ready
eth1: New link status: Disconnected (0002)
==
[ INFO: hard-safe - hard-unsafe lock order detected ]
2.6.18rc2-gitSomething on my firewall box just triggered this..
Dave
[515613.791771] ===
[515613.841467] [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]
[515613.873284]
mainline, and backed out numerous fixes
made to it in the mainline kernel. It's a huge effort to get the 'good bits'
out of that patch, and letting it die is the only sensible solution IMO.
ACKed-by: Dave Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+SK98LIN GIGABBIT ETHERNET DRIVER
typo :-)
Dave
net/sched/sch_htb.c: In function 'htb_change_class':
net/sched/sch_htb.c:1605: error: expected ';' before 'do_gettimeofday'
Signed-off-by: Dave Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- linux-2.6.17.noarch/net/sched/sch_htb.c~2006-07-15 03:40:14.0
-0400
+++ linux-2.6.17.noarch/net/sched/sch_htb.c
Not sure if this one got reported/fixed yet, as I was running
a kernel from sometime last week..
Dave
===
[ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]
---
With 2.6.18rc1 + a selection of the lockdep tweaks found so far,
midnight commander makes the kernel unhappy.
Dave
===
[ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]
Another one triggered by a Fedora-development user..
e100: eth1: e100_watchdog: link up, 100Mbps, half-duplex
=
[ INFO: possible irq lock inversion dependency detected ]
-
ipcalc/1671
===
[ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]
---
gnome-settings-/3278 is trying to acquire lock:
(sk_lock-AF_INET){--..}, at: [8022800c] tcp_sendmsg+0x1f/0xb1a
but task
On Fri, Jun 30, 2006 at 01:14:30PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
Ar Gwe, 2006-06-30 am 11:54 +0200, ysgrifennodd Arjan van de Ven:
another quick hack is to check for vesa lb... eg if pci is present, skip
this thing entirely :)
Not really, many people made VLB/PCI combo boards.
- check the
On Thu, Jun 29, 2006 at 10:46:24PM +0200, Michal Piotrowski wrote:
On 29/06/06, Dave Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Jun 29, 2006 at 10:39:33PM +0200, Michal Piotrowski wrote:
This looks very strange.
BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address 6b6b6c07
On Thu, Jun 29, 2006 at 10:39:33PM +0200, Michal Piotrowski wrote:
This looks very strange.
BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address 6b6b6c07
Looks like a use after free.
printing eip:
c0138594
*pde=
Oops: 0002 [#1]
4K_STACK PREEMPT SMP
last
On Mon, Jun 12, 2006 at 06:39:58PM +0300, Faidon Liambotis wrote:
FWIW, I think we've experienced a similar situation like this in the
past in the networking land and the consensus was to completely remove
the other driver. I'm referring to e100/eepro100, of course.
The difference with
On Sat, Jun 10, 2006 at 02:08:50PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
On Sat, Jun 10, 2006 at 08:50:10PM +0300, Faidon Liambotis wrote:
Remove Prism II IDs from the orinoco driver since now we have a separate
driver for them (HostAP). Additionally, kill orinoco_{pci,plx,nortel}
completely
On Sun, Jun 11, 2006 at 06:27:19PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
On Sat, Jun 10, 2006 at 02:08:50PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
On Sat, Jun 10, 2006 at 08:50:10PM +0300, Faidon Liambotis wrote:
Remove Prism II IDs from the orinoco driver since now we have a
separate
driver for them
On Sun, Jun 11, 2006 at 06:31:40PM -0400, Kyle McMartin wrote:
On Sun, Jun 11, 2006 at 06:40:54PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
Under hostap, it's a brick, it won't even report any scanning results.
Did you switch it into managed mode? The hostap driver, iirc, defaults
to running
As we're already dereferencing dev a few lines above, if this
check could ever trigger, we'd have already oopsed.
Signed-off-by: Dave Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- linux-2.6/drivers/net/tulip/uli526x.c~ 2006-06-11 20:24:41.0
-0400
+++ linux-2.6/drivers/net/tulip/uli526x.c 2006
On Sat, Jun 10, 2006 at 08:50:10PM +0300, Faidon Liambotis wrote:
Remove Prism II IDs from the orinoco driver since now we have a separate
driver for them (HostAP). Additionally, kill orinoco_{pci,plx,nortel}
completely, since they only exist to support Prism cards.
No attempt was made to
On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 10:47:24AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.17-rc6/2.6.17-rc6-mm1/
Just spotted this typo in a new option.
Signed-off-by: Dave Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- rc6mm1/net/Kconfig~ 2006-06-07 14:19:44.0
On Thu, May 04, 2006 at 04:25:46PM -0700, David S. Miller wrote:
That being said, the first thing that should be tried is reverting
the above mentioned change and see if the problem goes away. If
so, then we need to investigate what the bandwidth delay product is
for the connection, and
So I pushed out an update for Fedora Core 5 users yesterday
that moved the kernel from 2.6.16.9 to 2.6.16.13.
I've since heard My network performance is awful, and worse
yet, some apps seem broken as in the report below.
Anyone have any ideas ?
Dave
--
On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 05:19:15PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
So I pushed out an update for Fedora Core 5 users yesterday
that moved the kernel from 2.6.16.9 to 2.6.16.13.
I've since heard My network performance is awful, and worse
yet, some apps seem broken as in the report below.
Further
With 2.6.17-rc3, my E1000 won't get a dhcp lease.
Looking at tcpdump and ifconfig output, it's easy to see why.
It's recieving packets, but the packets transmitted field
of ifconfig never increases.
The last version I have built that worked ok was 2.6.17rc2-git3
NIC is ..
03:0e.0 Ethernet
/selinux/xfrm.c:317: error: 'struct sec_path' has no member named 'x'
Does this look sane ?
Signed-off-by: Dave Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- linux-2.6.16.noarch/security/selinux/xfrm.c~2006-04-02
23:27:07.0 -0500
+++ linux-2.6.16.noarch/security/selinux/xfrm.c 2006-04-02 23:27
: undefined
reference to `wireless_rtnetlink_get'
Signed-off-by: Dave Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- linux-2.6.16.noarch/drivers/net/wireless/Kconfig~ 2006-03-24
18:01:46.0 -0500
+++ linux-2.6.16.noarch/drivers/net/wireless/Kconfig2006-03-24
18:02:03.0 -0500
@@ -27,6 +27,7
We're leaking an skb in a failure path in this function.
Coverity #632
Signed-off-by: Dave Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- linux-2.6/drivers/net/tun.c~2006-03-08 22:43:54.0 -0500
+++ linux-2.6/drivers/net/tun.c 2006-03-08 22:46:16.0 -0500
@@ -249,8 +249,11 @@ static
Variation on a theme, with same result - double free of same object.
Coverity #950
Signed-off-by: Dave Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- linux-2.6/net/sunrpc/auth_gss/gss_krb5_seal.c~ 2006-03-06
04:23:05.0 -0500
+++ linux-2.6/net/sunrpc/auth_gss/gss_krb5_seal.c 2006-03-06
04:23
We've already dereferenced 'np' a dozen
times at this point, so it's safe to say it's not null.
Signed-off-by: Dave Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- linux-2.6.15.noarch/net/ipv6/ip6_output.c~ 2006-03-06 02:22:05.0
-0500
+++ linux-2.6.15.noarch/net/ipv6/ip6_output.c 2006-03-06 02:23
On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 03:35:05PM -0800, David S. Miller wrote:
From: Dave Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2006 19:24:23 -0500
This seems to be trivial to trigger.
Signed-off-by: Dave Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Applied, thanks.
I did some more testing with this.
Rate
On Sun, Feb 12, 2006 at 09:46:43AM +0100, Marcel Holtmann wrote:
Triggered whilst running a socket stress test.
(The tainted flag came from 'p8023')
does 2.6.15-1.1929_FC5smp equals 2.6.16-rc2-git?
yes.
How do you produce these oopses, because I've never seen them.
On Sun, Feb 12, 2006 at 10:19:36AM +0100, Marcel Holtmann wrote:
Hi Dave,
Triggered whilst running a socket stress test.
(The tainted flag came from 'p8023')
does 2.6.15-1.1929_FC5smp equals 2.6.16-rc2-git?
yes.
not additional Fedora specific patches? It is
suggested that to me off-list, but I hadn't got around to it yet.
Looks good to me.
Signed-off-by: Dave Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dave
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe netdev in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http
This seems to be trivial to trigger.
Signed-off-by: Dave Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- linux-2.6.15.noarch/net/atm/signaling.c~2006-02-11 19:20:09.0
-0500
+++ linux-2.6.15.noarch/net/atm/signaling.c 2006-02-11 19:21:30.0
-0500
@@ -56,7 +56,8 @@ static void sigd_put_skb
On Sat, Feb 11, 2006 at 06:11:48PM -0800, Randy.Dunlap wrote:
needs quotes: GPL
Indeed.
Missing license tag.
I've assumed this is GPL. (It could also use a MODULE_AUTHOR)
Signed-off-by: Dave Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- linux-2.6.15.noarch/net/802/p8023.c~2006-02-11 21:15
On Sat, Feb 11, 2006 at 07:37:19PM -0800, David S. Miller wrote:
From: Dave Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2006 21:17:38 -0500
On Sat, Feb 11, 2006 at 06:11:48PM -0800, Randy.Dunlap wrote:
needs quotes: GPL
Indeed.
Dave, please type make patches you
Triggered whilst running a socket stress test.
(The tainted flag came from 'p8023')
Dave
Feb 11 21:52:00 trogdor kernel: Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer
dereference at virtual address 01b0
Feb 11 21:52:00 trogdor kernel: printing eip:
Feb 11 21:52:00 trogdor kernel:
I've had a box being tortured with random junk packets (created with isic)
for a few days, and it spat this out last night..
Feb 1 04:28:09 trogdor kernel: Slab corruption: (Not tainted) start=cefc8a9c,
len=244
Feb 1 04:28:09 trogdor kernel: Redzone: 0x5a2cf071/0x5a2cf071.
Feb 1 04:28:09
On Wed, Feb 01, 2006 at 01:08:33PM -0500, Dave Jones wrote:
I managed to get a box running 2.6.16rc1-git4 to spit this out..
Dave
UDP: bad checksum. From 192.168.79.115:43047 to 192.168.76.106:61494 ulen
1083
Badness in dst_release at include/net/dst.h:154
On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 04:49:29PM -0800, David S. Miller wrote:
From: Dave Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2006 14:30:28 -0500
Here's a second flavour.
Can you git bisect to figure out when this problem started
to occur?
I'll give it a try sometime soon, though I'm up
On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 04:35:01PM -0800, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
If you are on a hostile network, or are running protocol tests, you can
easily get the logged swamped by messages about bad UDP and ICMP packets.
This turns those messages off unless a config option is enabled.
packets.
This turns those messages off unless a config option is enabled.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
NETDEBUG should print out something by default.
We should fix the NETDEBUG() users. Dave Jones recently fixed
a case in IGMP, for example.
It should
I managed to get a box running 2.6.16rc1-git4 to spit this out..
Dave
UDP: bad checksum. From 192.168.79.115:43047 to 192.168.76.106:61494 ulen 1083
Badness in dst_release at include/net/dst.h:154 (Not tainted)
[c029d580] __kfree_skb+0x36/0xdd
[c02ba807]
On Sun, Jan 22, 2006 at 07:32:56PM +0100, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
The only supported combinations are distributions with the kernels they
ship.
I think you're being unreasonable here.
Absolutely. The statement is also completely false.
Fedora rebases to a new point release shortly
On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 11:56:26AM -0800, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
Nack. changing module tables in one driver depending on another driver
is always bogus. Better send a patch to udev/modutils/whatever
maintainers
to prefer one over the others.
Is there really any such stuff
We got this in Fedora bugzilla from a user running a 2.6.15-rc7-git2 vintage
kernel. This seemed important enough to warrant a closer look by someone
familiar
with recent networking changes in case this hasn't been reported/fixed yet.
Dave
On Sat, Jan 07, 2006 at 08:13:54PM
Our daily build-system spat this out about 2.6.15-git2
WARNING:
/usr/src/build/676459-ia64/install/lib/modules/2.6.15-1.1830_FC5/kernel/net/dccp/dccp_ipv6.ko
needs unknown symbol csum_ipv6_magic
WARNING:
On Mon, Dec 12, 2005 at 09:59:30PM -0800, Linux Kernel wrote:
tree 987cfbd2134b82bea55c55fa17bd70d29df70458
parent 0e670506668a43e1355b8f10c33d081a676bd521
author Stephen Hemminger [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed, 07 Dec 2005 07:01:49 -0800
committer Jeff Garzik [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue, 13 Dec 2005
On Mon, Dec 05, 2005 at 02:08:28PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
Jiri Benc wrote:
On Mon, 05 Dec 2005 13:38:37 -0500, Joseph Jezak wrote:
We're not writing an entire stack. We're writing a layer that sits in
between the current ieee80211 stack that's already present in the kernel
and
Has anything changed recently in how e1000 handles checksum
offload ? My desktop box has been rock solid for months,
but the last few weeks I've noticed a lot of timeouts
over http etc.
Further investigation with ethereal showed incorrect tcp checksums
on certain packets.
Disabling rx/tx offload
On Mon, Nov 21, 2005 at 08:07:20AM +1100, Herbert Xu wrote:
Dave Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Has anything changed recently in how e1000 handles checksum
offload ? My desktop box has been rock solid for months,
but the last few weeks I've noticed a lot of timeouts
over http etc
On Mon, Nov 21, 2005 at 08:25:14AM +1100, Herbert Xu wrote:
On Sun, Nov 20, 2005 at 04:21:32PM -0500, Dave Jones wrote:
Hmm, that does make sense.
Maybe the problem exists elsewhere, as thinking more about it,
it's only certain sites that seem to have the problem
(I notice
101 - 162 of 162 matches
Mail list logo
