Re: [linux-4.4-mw] BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request ip_vs_out.constprop

Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 07:12:03PM IST, li...@eikelenboom.it wrote: >On 2015-11-12 17:52, Eric Dumazet wrote: >> On Thu, 2015-11-12 at 16:16 +0100, Sander Eikelenboom wrote: >> >>> > Thanks for the report, please try following patch : >>> >>> Hi Eric, >>> >>> Thanks for the patch! >>> Got it up

[PATCH net] switchdev: bridge: Check return code is not EOPNOTSUPP

red") Fixes: 6ac311ae8bfb ("Adding switchdev ageing notification on port bridged") Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <ido...@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <j...@mellanox.com> --- net/bridge/br_stp.c| 2 +- net/bridge/br_stp_if.c | 2 +- 2 files changed, 2 insertion

[PATCH net-next] bridge: vlan: Use rcu_dereference instead of rtnl_dereference

br_should_learn() is protected by RCU and not by RTNL, so use correct flavor of nbp_vlan_group(). Fixes: 907b1e6e83ed ("bridge: vlan: use proper rcu for the vlgrp member") Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <ido...@mellanox.com> Acked-by: Nikolay Aleksandrov <niko...@cumulusnetworks.c

Re: [PATCH net-next] switchdev: enforce no pvid flag in vlan ranges

Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 05:58:33AM IDT, sfel...@gmail.com wrote: >On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 10:42 AM, Ido Schimmel <ido...@mellanox.com> wrote: >> Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 08:14:24PM IDT, sfel...@gmail.com wrote: >>>On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 8:25 AM, Vivien Didelot >>><

Re: [PATCH net-next] switchdev: enforce no pvid flag in vlan ranges

Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 08:14:24PM IDT, sfel...@gmail.com wrote: >On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 8:25 AM, Vivien Didelot ><vivien.dide...@savoirfairelinux.com> wrote: >> On Oct. Wednesday 14 (42) 09:14 AM, Ido Schimmel wrote: >>> Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 05:32:26PM IDT, vivien.d

Re: [PATCH net-next] switchdev: enforce no pvid flag in vlan ranges

Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 05:32:26PM IDT, vivien.dide...@savoirfairelinux.com wrote: >On Oct. Tuesday 13 (42) 11:31 AM, Ido Schimmel wrote: >> Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 08:36:25PM IDT, vivien.dide...@savoirfairelinux.com >> wrote: >> >Hi guys, >> > >> >On Oct. Mo

Re: [PATCH net-next 4/5] bridge: vlan: fix possible null ptr derefs on port init and deinit

Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 09:16:54PM IDT, ra...@blackwall.org wrote: >From: Nikolay Aleksandrov > >When a new port is being added we need to make vlgrp available after >rhashtable has been initialized and when removing a port we need to >flush the vlans and free the

Re: [PATCH net-next 3/4] bridge: vlan: break vlan_flush in two phases to keep old order

Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 08:55:31PM IDT, niko...@cumulusnetworks.com wrote: >On 10/12/2015 07:39 PM, Ido Schimmel wrote: >> Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 02:41:08PM IDT, ra...@blackwall.org wrote: >>> From: Nikolay Aleksandrov <niko...@cumulusnetworks.com> >>> >> Hi,

Re: [PATCH net-next 1/4] bridge: vlan: use proper rcu for the vlgrp member

Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 02:41:06PM IDT, ra...@blackwall.org wrote: >From: Nikolay Aleksandrov > Hi Nik, Small nitpick: >@@ -825,17 +848,19 @@ unlock: > > int br_vlan_init(struct net_bridge *br) > { >+ struct net_bridge_vlan_group *vg; > int ret = -ENOMEM;

Re: [PATCH net-next 3/4] bridge: vlan: break vlan_flush in two phases to keep old order

Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 02:41:08PM IDT, ra...@blackwall.org wrote: >From: Nikolay Aleksandrov <niko...@cumulusnetworks.com> > Hi, >Ido Schimmel reported a problem with switchdev devices because of the >order change of del_nbp operations, more specifically the move of >nbp_vlan_

Re: [PATCH net-next 4/4] bridge: vlan: combine (br|nbp)_vlan_flush into one

Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 02:41:09PM IDT, ra...@blackwall.org wrote: >From: Nikolay Aleksandrov <niko...@cumulusnetworks.com> > >As Ido Schimmel pointed out the vlan_vid_del() loop in nbp_vlan_flush is >unnecessary (and is actually a remnant of the old vlan code) so we can >remov

Re: [PATCH net-next 4/4] bridge: vlan: combine (br|nbp)_vlan_flush into one

Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 09:15:39PM IDT, vivien.dide...@savoirfairelinux.com wrote: >Hi, > >On Oct. Monday 12 (42) 08:51 PM, Ido Schimmel wrote: >> Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 02:41:09PM IDT, ra...@blackwall.org wrote: >> >From: Nikolay Aleksandrov <niko...@cumulusnetworks.co

Re: [PATCH net-next v2 1/4] bridge: vlan: use proper rcu for the vlgrp member

ed-off-by: Nikolay Aleksandrov <niko...@cumulusnetworks.com> Reviewed-by: Ido Schimmel <ido...@mellanox.com> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Re: [PATCH net-next v2 2/4] bridge: vlan: use rcu for vlan_list traversal in br_fill_ifinfo

s spinlock only which is a problem for the vlan code, so use >explicitly rcu for that to avoid problems. > >Signed-off-by: Nikolay Aleksandrov <niko...@cumulusnetworks.com> Reviewed-by: Ido Schimmel <ido...@mellanox.com> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubsc

Re: [PATCH net-next v2 3/4] bridge: vlan: drop unnecessary flush code

Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 10:47:04PM IDT, ra...@blackwall.org wrote: >From: Nikolay Aleksandrov <niko...@cumulusnetworks.com> > >As Ido Schimmel pointed out the vlan_vid_del() code in nbp_vlan_flush is >unnecessary (and is actually a remnant of the old vlan code) so we can >rem

Re: [PATCH net-next] switchdev: enforce no pvid flag in vlan ranges

Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 08:36:25PM IDT, vivien.dide...@savoirfairelinux.com wrote: >Hi guys, > >On Oct. Monday 12 (42) 02:01 PM, Nikolay Aleksandrov wrote: >> From: Nikolay Aleksandrov >> >> We shouldn't allow BRIDGE_VLAN_INFO_PVID flag in VLAN ranges. >> >>

Re: [PATCH net-next v2 4/4] bridge: vlan: move back vlan_flush

Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 10:47:05PM IDT, ra...@blackwall.org wrote: >From: Nikolay Aleksandrov <niko...@cumulusnetworks.com> > >Ido Schimmel reported a problem with switchdev devices because of the >order change of del_nbp operations, more specifically the move of >nbp_vlan_flus

Re: [PATCH net] switchdev: bridge: Check return code is not EOPNOTSUPP

Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 02:34:45PM IST, li...@eikelenboom.it wrote: >On 2015-11-13 12:06, Ido Schimmel wrote: >> When NET_SWITCHDEV=n, switchdev_port_attr_set simply returns >> EOPNOTSUPP. >> In this case we should not emit errors and warnings to the kernel log. > >Hi Id

Re: [patch net-next v2 01/28] net: dev: Check CHANGEUPPER notifier return value

Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 01:20:50AM IST, john.fastab...@gmail.com wrote: >On 15-12-02 12:07 PM, Jiri Pirko wrote: >> From: Ido Schimmel <ido...@mellanox.com> >> >> switchdev drivers reflect the newly requested topology to hardware when >> CHANGEUPPER is received,

Re: [patch net] switchdev: bridge: Pass ageing time as clock_t instead of jiffies

Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 05:53:19PM IST, dsah...@gmail.com wrote: >On 12/21/15 3:56 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote: >> diff --git a/net/bridge/br_stp_if.c b/net/bridge/br_stp_if.c >> index 5396ff08..12045de 100644 >> --- a/net/bridge/br_stp_if.c >> +++ b/net/bridge/br_stp_if.c >> @@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ void

Re: [PATCH net] bridge: Fix incorrect re-injection of STP packets

gt;re-inject it to the Rx path by returning RX_HANDLER_PASS. This is >consistent with previous behavior. > >Cc: Florian Westphal <f...@strlen.de> >Fixes: 8626c56c8279 ("bridge: fix potential use-after-free when hook returns >QUEUE or STOLEN verdict") >Reviewed-by: Jir

[PATCH net v2] bridge: Fix incorrect re-injection of STP packets

iaki Makita <makita.toshi...@lab.ntt.co.jp> Fixes: 8626c56c8279 ("bridge: fix potential use-after-free when hook returns QUEUE or STOLEN verdict") Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <j...@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <ido...@mellanox.com> -- v1->v2: * Prevent a m

Re: [PATCH] mlxsw: core: Remove deprecated create_workqueue

try points to >and notifies the bridge using the switchdev notifier) and >mlxsw_emad_trans_timeout_work (provides async EMAD register access) >respectively. The ordering here is off - timeout_dw is for mlxsw_emad_trans_timeout_work() and fdb_notify.dw is for mlxsw_sp_fdb_notify_work(),

[PATCH net] bridge: Fix incorrect re-injection of STP packets

n Westphal <f...@strlen.de> Fixes: 8626c56c8279 ("bridge: fix potential use-after-free when hook returns QUEUE or STOLEN verdict") Reviewed-by: Jiri Pirko <j...@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <ido...@mellanox.com> --- net/bridge/br_input.c | 12 +++- 1 f

Re: [PATCH net] bridge: Fix incorrect re-injection of STP packets

Sat, Jun 04, 2016 at 09:41:41AM IDT, shmulik.ladk...@gmail.com wrote: >Hi, > >On Fri, 3 Jun 2016 12:39:45 +0300 Ido Schimmel <ido...@mellanox.com> wrote: >> diff --git a/net/bridge/br_input.c b/net/bridge/br_input.c >> index 1607977..c73ed44 100644 >> --- a/n

[PATCH net] team: Fix possible deadlock during team enslave

ck); *** DEADLOCK *** Fixes: cb41c997d444 ("team: team should sync the port's uc/mc addrs when add a port") Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <j...@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <ido...@mellanox.com> --- drivers/net/team/team.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --g

Re: [PATCH RFC 1/3] net: bridge: log state when setting it

Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 11:34:18PM IST, vivien.dide...@savoirfairelinux.com wrote: Hi Vivien, >Every call to br_set_state is followed by a call to br_log_state. >Directly call it within br_set_state instead. > >Signed-off-by: Vivien Didelot >--- Maybe I'm

Re: [PATCH RFC 2/3] net: bridge: set forwarding state on port removal

Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 11:34:19PM IST, vivien.dide...@savoirfairelinux.com wrote: Hi Vivien, >When a port leaves a bridge, the bridge layer puts its STP state to >Disabled. If the port is part of an hardware switch, the mode needs to >be set to Forwarding in order to restore communication with the

Re: [PATCH net] bridge: fix regression in ageing time

Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 11:31:09PM IST, step...@networkplumber.org wrote: Hi, >This fixes a regression in the bridge ageing time caused by: > >commit c62987bbd8a1 ("bridge: push bridge setting ageing_time down to >switchdev") > >There are users of Linux bridge which use the feature that if ageing

Re: [patch net-next 6/9] mlxsw: spectrum: Unmap local port from module during teardown

Hi John, Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 10:32:47PM IST, john.fastab...@gmail.com wrote: >On 16-02-22 10:32 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote: >> From: Ido Schimmel <ido...@mellanox.com> >> >> When splitting a port we replace it with 2 or 4 other ports. To be able >> to do that we

Re: [PATCH net-next] net: bridge: log port STP state on change

rfairelinux.com> >--- Acked-by: Ido Schimmel <ido...@mellanox.com> Thanks Vivien.

Re: [PATCH net] bridge: fix regression in ageing time

Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 11:31:09PM IST, step...@networkplumber.org wrote: >This fixes a regression in the bridge ageing time caused by: > >commit c62987bbd8a1 ("bridge: push bridge setting ageing_time down to >switchdev") > >There are users of Linux bridge which use the feature that if ageing time

Re: [PATCH net-next 3/3] net: dsa: refine netdev event notifier

ridge_master). > >Signed-off-by: Vivien Didelot <vivien.dide...@savoirfairelinux.com> Acked-by: Ido Schimmel <ido...@mellanox.com>

Re: [RFC PATCH net-next 1/2] net: bridge: add switchdev attr for port bridging

Hi Vivien, Wed, Mar 09, 2016 at 07:42:47PM IST, vivien.dide...@savoirfairelinux.com wrote: >Add a new SWITCHDEV_ATTR_ID_PORT_BRIDGE_IF switchdev attribute which is >set before adding a port to a bridge and deleting a port from a bridge. > >The main purpose for this attribute is to provide

Re: [RFC PATCH net-next 3/3] net: dsa: refine netdev event notifier

Hi Vivien, Sun, Mar 13, 2016 at 08:42:26AM IST, vivien.dide...@savoirfairelinux.com wrote: >Rework the netdev event handler, similar to what the Mellanox Spectrum >driver does, to eventually welcome NETDEV_PRECHANGEUPPER actions and use >netdev helpers, such as netif_is_bridge_master. >

Re: [PATCH net-next v3] rocker: add debugfs support to dump internal tables

Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 10:25:19PM IST, and...@lunn.ch wrote: >On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 04:10:31PM -0400, Murali Karicheri wrote: >> David, >> >> On 08/18/2015 04:47 PM, David Miller wrote: >> > I see some drivers where the foo_debugfs.c file is larger than the rest >> > of the driver. Once people

Re: [patch net 2/2] mlxsw: pci: Correctly determine if descriptor queue is full

Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 04:04:59PM IST, sergei.shtyl...@cogentembedded.com wrote: >Hello. > >On 3/7/2016 11:24 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote: > >> From: Ido Schimmel <ido...@mellanox.com> >> >> The descriptor queues for sending (SDQs) and receiving (RDQs) packets >&

Re: [PATCH] bridge: Allow set bridge ageing time when switchdev disabled

ile.com> Fixes: c62987bbd8a1 ("bridge: push bridge setting ageing_time down to switchdev") Acked-by: Ido Schimmel <ido...@mellanox.com> Thank you.

Re: [PATCH net-next 12/12] net/mlx5e: Disable link up on INIT HCA command

Hi, Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 10:00:47PM IDT, sae...@mellanox.com wrote: >From: Eran Ben Elisha > >Disable link up when initializing the HCA. Link up/down will be changed >using (Ports Administrative and Operational Status Register) PAOS >commands. > >If link layer is Ethernet,

Re: [PATCH net-next 12/12] net/mlx5e: Disable link up on INIT HCA command

Sat, Apr 23, 2016 at 11:21:45PM IDT, sae...@dev.mellanox.co.il wrote: >On Sat, Apr 23, 2016 at 7:00 PM, Ido Schimmel <ido...@mellanox.com> wrote: >> mutt suggests I sent you the following patches a while ago: >> >> net/mlx5e: Set port administrative status in ndo

Re: [PATCH net 3/3] Documentation: networking: dsa: Describe port_vlan_filtering

Hi Vivien, Florian, Tue, May 24, 2016 at 05:32:33PM IDT, vivien.dide...@savoirfairelinux.com wrote: >Hi Florian, > >Florian Fainelli writes: > >> Described what the port_vlan_filtering function is supposed to >> accomplish. >> >> Fixes: fb2dabad69f0 ("net: dsa: support VLAN

[PATCH net] bridge: Fix incorrect re-injection of LLDP packets

UEUE or STOLEN verdict") Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <ido...@mellanox.com> Reviewed-by: Jiri Pirko <j...@mellanox.com> Cc: Florian Westphal <f...@strlen.de> Cc: John Fastabend <john.fastab...@gmail.com> --- net/bridge/br_input.c | 8 1 file changed, 8 in

[PATCH net-next] mlxsw: spectrum: Fix compilation error when CLS_ACT isn't set

("mlxsw: spectrum: Add support in matchall mirror TC offloading") Reported-by: kbuild test robot <fengguang...@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <j...@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <ido...@mellanox.com> --- I know the merge window is already open, but I th

Re: [PATCH] mlxsw: spectrum_router: Fix use after free

xsw: spectrum_router: Implement fib4 add/del > switchdev obj ops") > Signed-off-by: Vincent Stehlé <vincent.ste...@laposte.net> > Cc: Jiri Pirko <j...@mellanox.com> Acked-by: Ido Schimmel <ido...@mellanox.com> Thank you.

[PATCH iproute2-master 2/2] man: Point to 'devlink-sb' from 'devlink' man page

Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <j...@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <ido...@mellanox.com> --- man/man8/devlink.8 | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/man/man8/devlink.8 b/man/man8/devlink.8 index df00f4f..cf0563b 100644 --- a/man/man8/devlink.8 +++ b/man/ma

[PATCH iproute2-master 1/2] man: Add devlink man pages to Makefile

Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <j...@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <ido...@mellanox.com> --- man/man8/Makefile | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/man/man8/Makefile b/man/man8/Makefile index 929826e..9badbed 100644 --- a/man/man8/Makefile ++

Re: [patch net-next 1/9] mlxsw: pci: Add resources query implementation.

kel <nog...@mellanox.com> >Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <j...@mellanox.com> Reviewed-by: Ido Schimmel <ido...@mellanox.com>

Re: [patch net-next 2/9] mlxsw: pci: Add max span resources to resources query

Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 11:19:13AM IDT, j...@resnulli.us wrote: >From: Nogah Frankel <nog...@mellanox.com> > >Add max span resources to resources query. > >Signed-off-by: Nogah Frankel <nog...@mellanox.com> >Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <j...@mellanox.com> Reviewed-by: Ido Schimmel <ido...@mellanox.com>

[PATCH net 2/3] mlxsw: spectrum: Do not override PAUSE settings

is also accessed via ethtool ops, but there we are guaranteed to have PFC disabled. Fixes: d81a6bdb87ce ("mlxsw: spectrum: Add IEEE 802.1Qbb PFC support") Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <ido...@mellanox.com> --- drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_dcb.c | 2 ++ 1 file chang

[PATCH net 1/3] mlxsw: spectrum: Do not assume PAUSE frames are disabled

When ieee_setpfc() gets called, PAUSE frames are not necessarily disabled on the port. Check if PAUSE frames are disabled or enabled and configure the port's headroom buffer accordingly. Fixes: d81a6bdb87ce ("mlxsw: spectrum: Add IEEE 802.1Qbb PFC support") Signed-off-by: Ido Sch

[PATCH net 3/3] mlxsw: spectrum: Add missing DCB rollback in error path

We correctly execute mlxsw_sp_port_dcb_fini() when port is removed, but I missed its rollback in the error path of port creation, so add it. Fixes: f00817df2b42 ("mlxsw: spectrum: Introduce support for Data Center Bridging (DCB)") Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <ido...@mellanox.com&

[PATCH net 0/3] mlxsw: DCB fixes

Patches 1 and 2 fix a problem in which PAUSE frames settings are wrongly overridden when ieee_setpfc() gets called. Patch 3 adds a missing rollback in port's creation error path. Ido Schimmel (3): mlxsw: spectrum: Do not assume PAUSE frames are disabled mlxsw: spectrum: Do not override PAUSE

Re: [patch net-next 11/42] mlxsw: spectrum: Add router interface struct

Fri, Jul 01, 2016 at 07:16:23PM IDT, d...@cumulusnetworks.com wrote: >On 7/1/16 8:04 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote: >> @@ -327,6 +333,19 @@ mlxsw_sp_port_vport_find_by_fid(const struct >> mlxsw_sp_port *mlxsw_sp_port, >> return NULL; >> } >> >> +static inline struct mlxsw_sp_rif * >>

Re: [patch net-next 10/42] mlxsw: spectrum_router: Add basic ipv4 router initialization

Fri, Jul 01, 2016 at 05:39:01PM IDT, d...@cumulusnetworks.com wrote: >On 7/1/16 8:04 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote: >> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum.h >> b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum.h >> index 05d5fcc..c2ac037 100644 >> ---

Re: [patch net 5/9] mlxsw: spectrum: Add missing packet traps

On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 02:51:20PM +, Ilan Tayari wrote: > > Add the following traps: > > > > 1) MTU Error: Trap packets whose size is bigger than the egress RIF's MTU. > > If DF > > bit isn't set, traffic will continue to be routed in slow path. > > > > 2) TTL Error: Trap packets whose TTL

Re: [patch net-next 12/15] ipv4: fib: Notify about nexthop status changes

On Wed, Feb 08, 2017 at 09:56:00AM -0500, Andy Gospodarek wrote: > On Wed, Feb 08, 2017 at 11:16:39AM +0100, Jiri Pirko wrote: > > From: Ido Schimmel <ido...@mellanox.com> > > > > When a multipath route is hit the kernel doesn't consider nexthops that &g

Re: [patch net-next 12/15] ipv4: fib: Notify about nexthop status changes

On Wed, Feb 08, 2017 at 11:05:54AM -0700, David Ahern wrote: > On 2/8/17 8:32 AM, Ido Schimmel wrote: > > In the case of multipath routes, if some of the nexthops can be > > reflected, then we do so, but periodically ask the kernel to try and > > resolve the others. Othe

Re: [patch net-next 00/15] mlxsw: Reflect nexthop status changes

On Wed, Feb 08, 2017 at 03:43:45PM -0500, David Miller wrote: > From: David Miller > Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2017 15:28:48 -0500 (EST) > > > Looks really nice, series applied, thanks! > > Jiri, just FYI, I bungled up merging this. And I am trying to fix > that up. > > I forgot

Re: [PATCH] net: mellanox: switchx2: use new api ethtool_{get|set}_link_ksettings

gned-off-by: Philippe Reynes <trem...@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Ido Schimmel <ido...@mellanox.com> Tested-by: Ido Schimmel <ido...@mellanox.com> Thanks!

Re: cls_matchall and port mirroring questions

On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 07:00:50PM -0800, Florian Fainelli wrote: > Hi, > > As I am adding support for cls_matchall in the b53/bcm_sf2 drivers, I > was looking into several, yet unrelated things: > > - mlxsw does not seem to specify whether the port used for capture > remains usable, or blocks

Re: [patch net-next 4/4] mlxsw: spectrum: Add packet sample offloading support

sample rate group [trunc ] > > Where only ingress qdiscs are supported, and only a combination of > matchall classifier and sample action will lead to activating hardware > packet sampling. > > Signed-off-by: Yotam Gigi <yot...@mellanox.com> > Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <j...@mellanox.com> Reviewed-by: Ido Schimmel <ido...@mellanox.com>

Re: [PATCH net-next V3 3/7] net/sched: Reflect HW offload status

On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 10:28:21AM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > What worries me is that the moment we started offloading packet > modification we run at the risk of modifying packets twice. This used > to be a problem only for eBPF but now mlx5 can also offload things like > ttl decrement. For

Re: [PATCH net] net: neigh: Fix netevent NETEVENT_DELAY_PROBE_TIME_UPDATE notification

x/mlxsw/spectrum_router.c): in case > of this event, it only accesses the DELAY_PROBE_TIME of the > passed neigh_parms. > > Signed-off-by: Marcus Huewe <suse-...@gmx.de> Fixes: 2a4501ae18b5 ("neigh: Send a notification when DELAY_PROBE_TIME changes") Reviewed-by: Ido Schimmel <ido...@mellanox.com> Next time, please Cc the author of the commit you're referring to in your patch. Thanks!

Re: RFC: unit tests for kernel GTP module

Hi, On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 11:08:01PM +0100, Harald Welte wrote: > Also, if netdev folks have some ideas/pointers about possible > frameworks/tools for this kind of testing [it must exist for at least > some other kernel networking code?]: Please let me know. I'd be > interested to have a look

Re: [PATCH net-next] bridge: don't indicate expiry on NTF_EXT_LEARNED fdb entries

r such entries. Hence, don't > indicate expiry for such fdb entries. > > CC: Nikolay Aleksandrov <niko...@cumulusnetworks.com> > CC: Jiri Pirko <j...@resnulli.us> > CC: Ido Schimmel <ido...@mellanox.com> > Signed-off-by: Roopa Prabhu <ro...@cumulusnetworks.

Re: [patch net] mlxsw: spectrum_buffers: Fix pool value handling in mlxsw_sp_sb_tc_pool_bind_set

: spectrum_buffers: Implement shared buffer > configuration") > Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <j...@mellanox.com> Reviewed-by: Ido Schimmel <ido...@mellanox.com> Thanks!

Re: [patch net 1/2] mlxsw: spectrum_router: Fix error path in mlxsw_sp_router_init

t;) > Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <j...@mellanox.com> Acked-by: Ido Schimmel <ido...@mellanox.com> Thanks

Re: [PATCH] mlxsw: spectrum: mark symbols static where possible

Hi, On Sun, Sep 18, 2016 at 04:39:47PM +0800, Baoyou Xie wrote: > We get 3 warnings when building kernel with W=1: > drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum.c:251:29: warning: no previous > prototype for 'mlxsw_sp_span_entry_find' [-Wmissing-prototypes] >

Re: MDB offloading of local ipv4 multicast groups

On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 08:58:50PM +0200, John Crispin wrote: > Hi, > > While adding MDB support to the qca8k dsa driver I found that ipv4 mcast > groups don't always get propagated to the dsa driver. In my setup there > are 2 clients connected to the switch, both running a mdns client. The >

Re: [patch net-next 1/6] fib: introduce FIB notification infrastructure

On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 01:53:09PM +0200, Jiri Pirko wrote: > From: Jiri Pirko > > This allows to pass information about added/deleted FIB entries/rules to > whoever is interested. This is done in a very similar way as devinet > notifies address additions/removals. > >

Re: [patch net-next 2/6] fib: introduce FIB info offload flag helpers

; > Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <j...@mellanox.com> Reviewed-by: Ido Schimmel <ido...@mellanox.com> Thanks

Re: [patch net-next 6/6] doc: update switchdev L3 section

ute's nexthop list don't all have the same switch ID, the > -driver is not called to add/modify/delete the FIB entry. > +port netdevs mentioned in the routes next hop list. s/routes/route's/ ? Reviewed-by: Ido Schimmel <ido...@mellanox.com> Thanks! > > Routes offloaded to the de

Re: [patch net-next 5/6] switchdev: remove FIB offload infrastructure

On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 01:53:13PM +0200, Jiri Pirko wrote: > From: Jiri Pirko > > Since this is now taken care of by FIB notifier, remove the code, with > all unused dependencies. > > Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko [...] > -static struct net_device

Re: [patch net-next 3/6] mlxsw: spectrum_router: Use FIB notifications instead of switchdev calls

On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 01:53:11PM +0200, Jiri Pirko wrote: > From: Jiri Pirko > > Until now, in order to offload a FIB entry to HW we use switchdev op. > However that has limits. Mainly in case we need to make the HW aware of > all route prefixes configured in kernel. HW

Re: [PATCH 2/2] mlxsw: spectrum_router: avoid potential uninitialized data usage

; Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <a...@arndb.de> For net-next: Acked-by: Ido Schimmel <ido...@mellanox.com> BTW, which flags did you pass to generate this error? I can only reproduce this with EXTRA_CFLAGS="-Wmaybe-uninitialized -Werror", but for some reason EXTRA_CFLAGS=&q

Re: [patch net-next v2 3/6] mlxsw: spectrum_router: Use FIB notifications instead of switchdev calls

On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 11:22:12AM +0200, Jiri Pirko wrote: > From: Jiri Pirko > > Until now, in order to offload a FIB entry to HW we use switchdev op. > However that has limits. Mainly in case we need to make the HW aware of > all route prefixes configured in kernel. HW

Re: [PATCH][V2] mlxsw: spectrum: remove redundant check if err is zero

On Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at 06:03:38PM -0700, Colin King wrote: > From: Colin Ian King > > There is an earlier check and return if err is non-zero, so > the check to see if it is zero is redundant in every iteration > of the loop and hence the check can be removed. > >

Re: [patch net-next v3 3/6] mlxsw: spectrum_router: Use FIB notifications instead of switchdev calls

figured in kernel. HW needs to know those in order > to properly trap appropriate packets and pass the to kernel to do > the forwarding. Abort mechanism is now handled within the mlxsw driver. > > Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <j...@mellanox.com> Reviewed-by: Ido Schimmel <ido...@mellanox.com> Thanks

Re: [PATCH net-next] net: core: Traverse the adjacency list from first entry

On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 09:05:35AM -0600, David Ahern wrote: > On 10/26/16 12:39 AM, ido...@idosch.org wrote: > > From: Ido Schimmel <ido...@mellanox.com> > > > > netdev_next_lower_dev() returns NULL when we finished traversing the > > adjacency list ('iter' poin

Re: [patch net 1/2] mlxsw: spectrum: Fix refcount bug on span entries

On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 11:20:41AM +0100, Jiri Pirko wrote: > From: Yotam Gigi > > When binding port to a newly created span entry, its refcount is set 0 > even though it has a bound port. That leeds to unexpected behaviour when s/leeds/leads/ > the user tries to delete

Re: [patch net 2/2] mlxsw: spectrum_router: Correctly dump neighbour activity

: c723c735fa6b ("mlxsw: spectrum_router: Periodically update the > kernel's neigh table") > Signed-off-by: Arkadi Sharshevsky <arka...@mellanox.com> > Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <ido...@mellanox.com> > Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <j...@me

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the net tree

On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 11:01:42AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Today's linux-next merge of the net-next tree got conflicts in: > > include/linux/netdevice.h > net/core/dev.c > > between commit: > > e4961b076885 ("net: core: Correctly iterate over lower adjacency list") >

Re: [PATCH net] net: core: Correctly iterate over lower adjacency list

Hi Dave, On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 10:38:29AM -0400, David Miller wrote: > From: ido...@idosch.org > Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2016 16:57:08 +0300 > > > From: Ido Schimmel <ido...@mellanox.com> > > > > Tamir reported the following trace when processing ARP requests rece

Re: [RFC net-next 0/3] net: bridge: Allow CPU port configuration

Hi Florian, On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 09:56:30AM -0800, Florian Fainelli wrote: > On 11/22/2016 09:41 AM, Ido Schimmel wrote: > > Hi Florian, > > > > On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 11:09:22AM -0800, Florian Fainelli wrote: > >> Hi all, > >> > >> This patch

Re: [RFC net-next 0/3] net: bridge: Allow CPU port configuration

Hi Florian, On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 11:09:22AM -0800, Florian Fainelli wrote: > Hi all, > > This patch series allows using the bridge master interface to configure > an Ethernet switch port's CPU/management port with different VLAN attributes > than > those of the bridge downstream

Re: [patch net-next v2 09/11] ipv4: fib: Add an API to request a FIB dump

On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 12:04:57AM +0100, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote: > On 23.11.2016 20:53, Ido Schimmel wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 06:47:03PM +0100, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote: > >> Hmm, I think you need to read the sequence counter under rtnl_lock to > >> hav

Re: [patch net-next v2 09/11] ipv4: fib: Add an API to request a FIB dump

On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 06:47:03PM +0100, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote: > Hmm, I think you need to read the sequence counter under rtnl_lock to > have an ordering with the rest of the updates to the RCU trie. Otherwise > you don't know if the fib trie has the correct view regarding to the > incoming

Re: [patch net-next v2 10/11] mlxsw: spectrum_router: Request a dump of FIB tables during init

On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 06:08:23PM +0100, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote: > On Wed, Nov 23, 2016, at 18:04, Jiri Pirko wrote: > > >Sure, but an abort function can be provided to the kernel anyway and the > > >driver can care about that. > > > > Ok, how? > > I think just a sysctl ontop of this series

Re: [patch net-next 6/8] ipv4: fib: Add an API to request a FIB dump

On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 08:43:25PM +0100, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote: > On 16.11.2016 19:51, Ido Schimmel wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 06:35:45PM +0100, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote: > >> On 16.11.2016 16:18, Ido Schimmel wrote: > >>> On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 03:

Re: [patch net-next 6/8] ipv4: fib: Add an API to request a FIB dump

Hi, On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 06:35:45PM +0100, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote: > On 16.11.2016 16:18, Ido Schimmel wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 03:51:01PM +0100, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote: > >> On 16.11.2016 15:09, Jiri Pirko wrote: > >>> From: Ido

Re: [patch net-next 6/8] ipv4: fib: Add an API to request a FIB dump

Hi Hannes, On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 03:51:01PM +0100, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote: > On 16.11.2016 15:09, Jiri Pirko wrote: > > From: Ido Schimmel <ido...@mellanox.com> > > > > Commit b90eb7549499 ("fib: introduce FIB notification infrastructure") > > in

Re: [patch net-next 6/8] ipv4: fib: Add an API to request a FIB dump

Hi Dave, On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 11:27:35AM -0500, David Miller wrote: > From: Hannes Frederic Sowa > Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2016 15:51:01 +0100 > > > I don't see a way around doing a journal like in filesystems somehow, > > We really just need a sequence counter

Re: [patch net-next 6/8] ipv4: fib: Add an API to request a FIB dump

Hi Hannes, On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 08:43:25PM +0100, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote: > On 16.11.2016 19:51, Ido Schimmel wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 06:35:45PM +0100, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote: > >> On 16.11.2016 16:18, Ido Schimmel wrote: > >>> On Wed, No

Re: [patch net-next 6/8] ipv4: fib: Add an API to request a FIB dump

On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 06:20:39PM +0100, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote: > On 17.11.2016 17:45, David Miller wrote: > > From: Hannes Frederic Sowa > > Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2016 15:36:48 +0100 > > > >> The other way is the journal idea I had, which uses an rb-tree with > >>

Re: [PATCH net-next v2] ipv4: fib: Replay events when registering FIB notifier

On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 02:24:06PM -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote: > On Mon, 2016-10-31 at 23:13 +0200, ido...@idosch.org wrote: > > From: Ido Schimmel <ido...@mellanox.com> > > > > When registering a FIB notifier block we should notify the caller of > > alrea

Re: [patch net] mlxsw: spectrum: Fix incorrect reuse of MID entries

Hi, On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 03:36:06PM -0400, David Miller wrote: > From: Jiri Pirko <j...@resnulli.us> > Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2016 10:09:22 +0100 > > > From: Ido Schimmel <ido...@mellanox.com> > > > > In the device, a MID entry represents a group of lo

Re: [PATCH net-next v2] ipv4: fib: Replay events when registering FIB notifier

On Tue, Nov 01, 2016 at 07:19:59AM -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote: > On Tue, 2016-11-01 at 00:57 +0200, Ido Schimmel wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 02:24:06PM -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote: > > > > How well will this work for large FIB tables ? > > > > > > Hold

Re: [PATCH net-next v2] ipv4: fib: Replay events when registering FIB notifier

Hi Roopa, On Tue, Nov 01, 2016 at 08:14:14AM -0700, Roopa Prabhu wrote: > On 11/1/16, 7:19 AM, Eric Dumazet wrote: > > On Tue, 2016-11-01 at 00:57 +0200, Ido Schimmel wrote: > >> On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 02:24:06PM -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote: > >>> How well will

Re: [PATCH net-next] ipv4: fib: Replay events when registering FIB notifier

On Tue, Nov 01, 2016 at 12:54:01AM +0800, kbuild test robot wrote: > Hi Ido, > > [auto build test ERROR on net-next/master] > > url: > https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/idosch-idosch-org/ipv4-fib-Replay-events-when-registering-FIB-notifier/20161031-163334 > config:

Re: [PATCH net-next v2] ipv4: fib: Replay events when registering FIB notifier

On Wed, Nov 02, 2016 at 06:29:40AM -0700, Roopa Prabhu wrote: > On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 12:20 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote: > > Wed, Nov 02, 2016 at 03:13:42AM CET, ro...@cumulusnetworks.com wrote: > >> > [snip] > > >>I understand..but, if you are adding some core infrastructure for

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   >