On Fri, 2008-01-04 at 00:32 -0800, David Miller wrote:
> Over the past day I've put together the following set of bug fixes for
> the Cassini driver.
>
> At least with my setup it appears to basically work fine, not leak
> memory, and the SKB BUG messages go away too.
>
> I'll be honest and say
Some more investigation revealed that the cassini driver leaks the data
portion of all RXed packets, this makes the driver completely unusable.
We've tested the following combinations:
* 2.6.17 (patched, but no cassini related patches)
* 2.6.22 Ubuntu Gutsy.
It still worked in 2.6.12 where we o
On Wed, 2007-11-21 at 01:25 +0100, Patrick McHardy wrote:
> David Miller wrote:
> > From: Laszlo Attila Toth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2007 14:52:12 +0100
> >
> >> Jan Engelhardt írta:
> >>> On Nov 20 2007 14:14, Laszlo Attila Toth wrote:
> This is the 6th version of our inte
Hi,
Is there a chance that this, or a patch with similar spirit (e.g. a way
to send packets from non-local IP addresses) could be merged?
On Fri, 2007-06-01 at 02:18 +0300, Julian Anastasov wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Thu, 31 May 2007, KOVACS Krisztian wrote:
>
> > So what about this one?
>
On Wed, 2007-01-10 at 07:46 +0100, Patrick McHardy wrote:
> KOVACS Krisztian wrote:
> > + rth->u.dst.lastuse = jiffies;
> > + dst_hold(&rth->u.dst);
> > + rth->u.dst.__use++;
> > + RT_CACHE_STAT_INC(in_hit);
> > +
On Fri, 2006-08-04 at 12:06 +0200, Patrick McHardy wrote:
> Balazs Scheidler wrote:
> > The use-case is as follows:
> >
> > * I have two different subsystems creating interfaces dynamically (for
> > example pptpd and serial pppd lines, each creating dynamic pppX
>
On Wed, 2006-08-02 at 21:08 -0700, Stephen J. Bevan wrote:
> Balazs Scheidler writes:
> > I would like to easily match a set of dynamically created interfaces
> > from my packet filter rules. The attached patch forms the basis of my
> > implementation and I would like to k
On Tue, 2006-08-01 at 11:29 -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Tue, 01 Aug 2006 19:10:09 +0200
> Balazs Scheidler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I would like to easily match a set of dynamically created interfaces
> > from my packet fil
On Tue, 2006-08-01 at 21:18 +0200, Sven Schuster wrote:
> Hi Phil,
>
> On Tue, Aug 01, 2006 at 11:46:55AM -0700, Phil Oester told us:
> > Since in this scenario userspace is able to determine ppp vs pptp,
> > could you not also do something like have an inbound_ppp and inbound_pptp
> > chain, the
Hi,
I would like to easily match a set of dynamically created interfaces
from my packet filter rules. The attached patch forms the basis of my
implementation and I would like to know whether something like this is
mergeable to mainline.
The use-case is as follows:
* I have two different subsyste
On Tue, 2006-01-31 at 00:22 +0100, Harald Welte wrote:
> ---
> commit 94d3d40c84672b74e59ea5252f61602610e1513e
> tree 63e5ae5174af9f982be6d8d1bbe11e750e4ace32
> parent e3c7a1f99300fbd6de35a40fcd9c4dc1b0fbfee2
> author Harald Welte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Fri, 27 Jan 2006 16:03:45 +0100
> committer Har
Hi,
Against latest net-2.6.14, but should apply to other versions as well. Please
apply.
diff-tree b13ca94bb73c79cbc1b34c4261b02c3df934498a (from
c097bee59e15d4703e53b8c21d9e9ce5da9365bc)
Author: Balazs Scheidler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat Aug 13 16:24:25 2005 +0200
As dis
On Thu, 2005-08-11 at 14:44 +0200, Balazs Scheidler wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-08-11 at 22:31 +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
> > Balazs Scheidler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > I've attached a revised patch, this time with complete error checking,
> > &g
On Thu, 2005-08-11 at 22:31 +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
> Balazs Scheidler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > I've attached a revised patch, this time with complete error checking, and
> > propagating the error code to the caller. Please apply.
>
> Sorry, but
On Mon, 2005-08-08 at 16:27 +0200, Balazs Scheidler wrote:
> Is this tiny patchlet worth the trouble of changing
> xfrm_init/xfrm_state_init to return int, and do error checking from
> ip_rt_init() ?
I've attached a revised patch, this time with complete error checking, and
propaga
Sent to myself the first time.
> >
> >
> > @@ -1097,6 +1097,8 @@ void __init xfrm_state_init(void)
> > {
> > int i;
> >
> > + xfrm_state_bydst = (struct list_head *)
> > __get_free_pages(GFP_KERNEL, get_order(sizeof(struct list_head) *
> > XFRM_DST_HSIZE * 2));
> > + xfr
Hi,
Commit log says it all.
Signed-off-by: Balazs Scheidler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
diff-tree a262e285077cb1604c25c5de99d71bbf739823e2 (from
684a28105211367d9040ee945cead597912cc49e)
Author: Balazs Scheidler <[EMAIL PROTECTED](none)>
Date: Sun Aug 7 20:23:59 2005 +0200
As disc
> Hi,
>
> I'm attaching a small testprogram which tries to install an
> XFRM_POLICY_FWD, and I confirmed with a printk that the value of 2 is
> successfully propagated to xfrm_sk_policy_insert().
test program originally missed, here it is this time.
--
Bazsi
#include
#include
#include
#incl
gle unsigned int value and no pointers.
A possible fix below can be found at the end of this mail.
Signed-off-by: Balazs Scheidler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c
+++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c
@@ -571,6 +571,9 @@ int xfrm_policy_delete(struct xfrm_polic
int xfrm_sk_policy_inse
19 matches
Mail list logo
