On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 12:10:51PM -0700, Michael Chan wrote:
On Sat, 2007-04-14 at 17:20 -0700, Michael Chan wrote:
I also like Andi's idea of using change_page_attr() to isolate the
problem. I'll try to send you a debug patch in the next few days to try
that out. Thanks.
Here's the
On Mon, Apr 02, 2007 at 12:13:00AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Mon, 2 Apr 2007 11:43:19 +1000 CaT [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I take minute by minute snapshots of network traffic by sampling
/proc/net/dev and most of the time everything works fine. Occasionally
though I get petabyte byte
On Thu, Apr 12, 2007 at 04:18:24PM -0700, Roland Dreier wrote:
Apr 11 22:14:02 ' eth0:220898233988841368 66750274000 0
0 86458738 52386430545 101089219 19931300 0 199313
0 '
Apr 11 22:15:02 ' eth0:17227454818 81381144000
On Mon, Apr 02, 2007 at 12:13:00AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Mon, 2 Apr 2007 11:43:19 +1000 CaT [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I take minute by minute snapshots of network traffic by sampling
/proc/net/dev and most of the time everything works fine. Occasionally
though I get petabyte byte
On Wed, Jul 05, 2006 at 07:54:01AM -0400, linux-os (Dick Johnson) wrote:
running since 8:42pm yesterday. It's 8:37am now. It hasn't progressed
in any way. It hasn't quit. It hasn't timed out. It just sits there,
hung. This leads me to consider the possibility of a DOS, either
intentional
On Fri, Jun 30, 2006 at 08:50:39AM +1000, CaT wrote:
Another datapoint to this is that I've had this my netcat web test
running since 8:42pm yesterday. It's 8:37am now. It hasn't progressed
in any way. It hasn't quit. It hasn't timed out. It just sits there,
hung. This leads me to consider
On Thu, Jun 29, 2006 at 10:50:00AM -0400, Bill Davidsen wrote:
Basically the mostlikely end-result is I don't know what there is a
problem and my customer doesn't know that there is a problem but they're
just not getting as many hits to their site that they otherwise would.
Ofcourse, this
I had recently upgraded to 2.6.17.1 and tried to go to
http://submit.spam.acma.gov.au/acma_submit.cgi?lang=EN
to report an australian spammer. Unfortunately the loading of the
webpage cuts out at 5472 bytes. I can repeat this each and every time
under 2.6.17.1 with
( echo 'get
On Wed, Jun 28, 2006 at 07:46:27PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
From: CaT [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2006 11:59:15 +1000
Now I found a thread about tcp window scaling affecting the loading of
some sites but I fail to load the above site with
/proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_adv_win_scale
On Wed, Jun 28, 2006 at 08:47:09PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
You can save yourself that hassle by informing the site admin
of the affected site that they have a firewall that misinterprets
the RFC standard window scaling field of the TCP headers. These
devices assume it is zero because they
10 matches
Mail list logo
