a similar issue on
arm64 but didn't get the chance to fix it (also at LPC). With a proper
commit message, feel free to add:
Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.mari...@arm.com>
leak_not_leak(skb);
Nitpick: I would add a short comment above the kmemleak_not_leak() calls
on why there is a false positive. Otherwise:
Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.mari...@arm.com>
On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 09:12:34AM +0200, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> On 05/17/2016 09:03 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> [...]
> >Someone's not gonna be happy with commit 606b5908 ("bpf: split
> >HAVE_BPF_JIT into cBPF and eBPF variant") breaking the sort order again...
>
> Wasn't aware of
t;
> CC: Daniel Borkmann <dan...@iogearbox.net>
> Acked-by: Zi Shen Lim <zlim@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Yang Shi <yang@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.mari...@arm.com>
On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 07:10:38PM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-09-24 at 16:15 +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > With "PRP0001", they can skip the _DSD properties review process (not
> > that they bother much currently) as long as the existing DT suppo
On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 06:57:03PM +0100, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> On 23/09/15 18:22, Jeremy Linton wrote:
> >|FWIW, mainline booting with this patch on Juno r1 with ACPI enabled
> >dies a |horrible death:
> >
> >Sorry about the delay, I didn't see this message.
> >
> >
> >
> >|How did you get this
On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 12:52:38PM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-09-24 at 11:31 +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > PRP0001 opens the door to any DT-like properties in ACPI and, knowing
> > how the ARM ecosystem works, I'm pretty sure we'll soon lose control (if
> &g
On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 01:04:55PM -0700, David Daney wrote:
On 08/11/2015 11:49 AM, David Miller wrote:
From: David Daney ddaney.c...@gmail.com
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2015 17:58:35 -0700
Change from v1: Drop PHY binding part, use fwnode_property* APIs.
The first patch (1/2) rearranges the
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 02:04:02PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Wednesday 20 May 2015 06:52:03 Suravee Suthikulanit wrote:
On 5/20/2015 5:01 AM, Catalin Marinas wrote:
On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 04:23:09PM -0500, Suravee Suthikulpanit wrote:
+static inline bool acpi_dma_is_supported(struct
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 11:27:54AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Wednesday 20 May 2015 10:24:15 Catalin Marinas wrote:
On Sat, May 16, 2015 at 01:59:00AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Friday, May 15, 2015 04:23:11 PM Suravee Suthikulpanit wrote:
+/**
+ * pci_dma_configure
On Thu, May 07, 2015 at 07:37:13PM -0500, Suravee Suthikulpanit wrote:
diff --git a/arch/arm64/Kconfig b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
index 4269dba..c7227e8 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
@@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
config ARM64
def_bool y
+ select ACPI_CCA_REQUIRED if ACPI
Jeff Garzik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The eepro100 removal has been blocked for almost a year by a vague
suggestion from Russell that e100 doesn't work on ARM. But he doesn't
have that machine anymore. So, we're stuck in limbo.
Russell might have tested it on an Integrator/AP (not sure
On 26/07/06, Catherine Zhang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Enclosed please find the new fix for the memory leak problem, incorporating
suggestions from Stephen and James.
FYI, Michal confirmed that, with this patch, kmemleak no longer
reports leaks in the context_struct_to_string() function in
Russell King [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Nov 23, 2005 at 10:15:48PM +, Russell King wrote:
Well, I've run 2.6.15-rc2 on what I think was the ARM platform which
exhibited the problem, but it doesn't show up.
The test was merely a did it successfully BOOTP because I can't
get it to
14 matches
Mail list logo
