Thanks David and Ido, for finding the root-cause for bridge Rx packets getting
dropped, also for coming up with a patch.
Regards,
Nelson
On 9/7/18, 9:09 AM, "David Ahern" wrote:
On 9/7/18 9:56 AM, D'Souza, Ne
Hi David,
Just following up would you be able to confirm that this is a Linux VRF
issue?
Also, how do I log a VRF related defect to ensure this gets resolved in a
subsequent release.
Thanks,
Nelson
On 8/2/18, 4:12 PM, "D'Souza, Nelson" wrote:
Hi David,
Turns o
/27/18, 4:29 PM, "D'Souza, Nelson" wrote:
David,
With Ubuntu 18.04.1 (kernel 4.15.0-29) pings sent out on test-vrf and br0
are successful.
# uname -rv
4.15.0-29-generic #31-Ubuntu SMP Tue Jul 17 15:39:52 UTC 2018
# ping -c 1 -I test-vrf 172.16.2.2
pi
17.10.1 (kernel 4.13.0-21) pings on only test-vrf are
successful. Pings on br0 are not successful.
So it seems like there maybe a change in versions after 4.13.0-21 that causes
pings on br0 to pass.
Nelson
On 7/25/18, 5:35 PM, "D'Souza, Nelson" wrote:
David,
I
lable as a text file in the /boot directory."
Would you be able to provide this?
Nelson
On 7/25/18, 5:35 PM, "D'Souza, Nelson" wrote:
David,
I tried out the commands on an Ubuntu 17.10.1 VM.
The pings on test-vrf are successful, but the pings on br0
tistics ---
2 packets transmitted, 0 received, 100% packet loss, time 1022ms
Please let me know if I should try a different version.
Nelson
On 7/24/18, 9:08 AM, "D'Souza, Nelson" wrote:
It's strange that enslaving eth1 -> br0 -> test-vrf does not work, but
enslaving eth1-
It's strange that enslaving eth1 -> br0 -> test-vrf does not work, but
enslaving eth1->test-vrf works fine.
Nelson
On 7/24/18, 8:58 AM, "D'Souza, Nelson" wrote:
Thank you David, really appreciate the help. Most likely something specific
to my environment.
On 7/23/18 7:43 PM, D'Souza, Nelson wrote:
> I copy and pasted the configs onto my device, but pings on test-vrf do
not work in my setup.
> I'm essentially seeing the same issue as I reported before.
>
> In this case, pings sent out on test-vrf (host ns) are
quest, id 19513, seq 0,
length 64
18:34:13.205278 IP 172.16.2.2 > 172.16.1.1: ICMP echo reply, id 19513, seq 0,
length 64
2 packets captured
2 packets received by filter
0 packets dropped by kernel
Thanks,
Nelson
On 7/23/18, 3:00 PM, "David Ahern" wrote:
On 7/20/18 1:03 PM,
th dev ==mgmt wouldn't match as well?
Nelson
On 7/19/18, 8:42 PM, "David Ahern" wrote:
On 7/19/18 7:52 PM, D'Souza, Nelson wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> I'm seeing a VRF/Netfilter related issue on a system running a 4.14.52
> Linux kernel.
>
:~# ip link show vrf mgmtvrf
16: mgmtbr0: mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue master
mgmtvrf state UP mode DEFAULT group default qlen 1000
link/ether c0:56:27:90:4f:75 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
Thanks,
Nelson
On 7/20/18, 12:11 PM, "David Ahern" wrote:
On 7/20/18 1:03 PM, D'Souza, Nelson wrote
al logs.
Thanks,
Nelson
On 7/19/18, 8:37 PM, "David Ahern" wrote:
On 7/19/18 8:19 PM, D'Souza, Nelson wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> I'm seeing the following issue on a system running a 4.14.52 Linux kernel.
>
>
>
> W
12 matches
Mail list logo
