significant?
Cheers,
Eric
---
|Eric BartonBarton Software |
|9 York Gardens Tel:+44 (117) 330 1575|
|CliftonMobile: +44 (7909) 680 356|
|Bristol BS8 4LLFax
In addition to that I'm pretty sure I remember that some clusterfs
person already posted these patches a while ago and got ripped apart
in the same way.
Yes - unfortunately I didn't submit my patch personally. And I've
rewritten it since to to avoid the obvious criticisms. This time
around,
Evgeniy,
You can use existing skb destructor and appropriate reference
counter is already there. In your own destructor you need to
call old one of course, and it's type can be determined from
the analysis of the headers and skb itself (there are not so
much destructor's types actually). If
This patch has been used with the lustre cluster file system (www.lustre.org)
to give notification when page buffers used to send bulk data via TCP/IP may be
overwritten. It implements...
a) A general-purpose callback to inform higher-level protocols when a
zero-copy send of a set of
This patch has been used with the lustre cluster file system (www.lustre.org)
to give notification when page buffers used to send bulk data via TCP/IP may be
overwritten. It implements...
a) A general-purpose callback to inform higher-level protocols when a
zero-copy send of a set of
David,
Also, the correct mailing list to get to the networking developers
is [EMAIL PROTECTED] linux-net is for users.
Noted.
Finally, I very much doubt you have much chance getting this
change in, the infrastructure is implemented in a very ad-hoc
fashion and it takes into consideration
