On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 03:22:27PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
From: Frederik Deweerdt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 17:00:14 +0200
I'm seeing an Oops[1] with a 2.6.19.2 kernel:
Frederik, I finally was able to spend some quality time on
this issue today. Sorry for taking so
Hi David,
On Mon, May 14, 2007 at 03:20:54AM -0700, David Miller wrote:
From: Frederik Deweerdt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 17:00:14 +0200
I think that not unix_state_rlock'ing other in
unix_dgram_connect may cause it to become NULL while passing
Hi,
I'm seeing an Oops[1] with a 2.6.19.2 kernel:
BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address
018c
printing eip:
c01cc54f
*pde =
Oops: [#1]
PREEMPT SMP
Modules linked in: ipmi_si ipmi_devintf ipmi_msghandler nfsd exportfs i8xx_tco
i2c_dev
On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 10:08:07AM -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
On Fri, May 04, 2007 at 03:02:36PM -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
Well I don't know, but something is going wrong and causing the soft
lock up. I must admit I am surprised if an interrupt can occour while
handling an
On Fri, May 04, 2007 at 10:10:24AM -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
On Thu, May 03, 2007 at 04:31:43PM -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
[...]
Should line 2563 be a spin_lock_irqsave instead along with the
appropriate unluck later?
IIRC, when you enable lockdep, it will complain about spinlocks used
On Fri, May 04, 2007 at 11:19:34AM -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
On Fri, May 04, 2007 at 04:33:26PM +0200, Frederik Deweerdt wrote:
On Fri, May 04, 2007 at 10:10:24AM -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
On Thu, May 03, 2007 at 04:31:43PM -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
[...]
Should line 2563
On Thu, Feb 22, 2007 at 04:54:52PM +0300, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:
Changes from 'take36' patchset:
* ported to 2.6.21-rc1
Hi Evgeniy,
The changes below were needed to be able to compile take37 on 2.6.21-rc1
with:
CONFIG_KEVENT=y
CONFIG_KEVENT_USER_STAT=y
CONFIG_KEVENT_TIMER=y
On Sun, Jan 21, 2007 at 01:45:27PM -0800, Auke Kok wrote:
Frederik Deweerdt wrote:
On Sun, Jan 21, 2007 at 09:17:41PM +0200, Andrei Popa wrote:
It's the 10th resume and in /proc/interrupts eth0 appers 10 times.
The e100_resume() function should be calling netif_device_detach and
free_irq
On Mon, Oct 02, 2006 at 02:26:36PM -0400, Jesse Huang wrote:
From: Jesse Huang [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Change Logs:
Solve host error problem in low performance embedded system when continune
down and up.
Signed-off-by: Jesse Huang [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
drivers/net/sundance.c | 26
