[PATCH] liquidio: Use %pad printk format for dma_addr_t values

2018-07-12 Thread Helge Deller
-by: Helge Deller diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/cavium/liquidio/request_manager.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/cavium/liquidio/request_manager.c index 1f2e75da28f8..d5d9e47daa4b 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/cavium/liquidio/request_manager.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/cavium/liquidio

[PATCH 13/14] netfilter/ipvs: Use %pS printk format for direct addresses

2017-09-06 Thread Helge Deller
The debug and error printk functions in ipvs uses wrongly the %pF instead of the %pS printk format specifier for printing symbols for the address returned by _builtin_return_address(0). Fix it for the ia64, ppc64 and parisc64 architectures. Signed-off-by: Helge Deller <del...@gmx.de> Cc: W

Re: rhashtable - rhashtable_insert_fast failed

2016-10-02 Thread Helge Deller
Hi Herbert, On 08.06.2016 04:39, Herbert Xu wrote: > On Tue, Jun 07, 2016 at 04:47:28PM +0200, Helge Deller wrote: >> On 07.06.2016 16:16, Herbert Xu wrote: >>> On Tue, Jun 07, 2016 at 04:13:50PM +0200, Helge Deller wrote: >>>> >>>> What warnings do yo

Re: rhashtable - rhashtable_insert_fast failed

2016-06-07 Thread Helge Deller
On 07.06.2016 16:16, Herbert Xu wrote: > On Tue, Jun 07, 2016 at 04:13:50PM +0200, Helge Deller wrote: >> >> What warnings do you mean specifically? Some specific CONFIG_ option ? > > Look for GFP_NOWARN in lib/rhashtable.c and delete it. Ok, removed it. It gener

Re: rhashtable - rhashtable_insert_fast failed

2016-06-07 Thread Helge Deller
On 06.06.2016 05:57, Herbert Xu wrote: > On Sat, Jun 04, 2016 at 09:35:27AM +0200, Phil Sutter wrote: >> [Cc'ing other interested parties, therefore full-quoting.] >> >> Hi Helge, >> >> On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 10:22:26PM +0200, Helge Deller wrote: >>> Hi

Re: rhashtable - rhashtable_insert_fast failed

2016-06-04 Thread Helge Deller
Hi Phil, On 04.06.2016 09:35, Phil Sutter wrote: > [Cc'ing other interested parties, therefore full-quoting.] > On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 10:22:26PM +0200, Helge Deller wrote: >> I'm testing 4.7.0-rc1-64bit on a parisc/hppa machine and get >> those message with CONFIG

Re: [PATCH v2] soreuseport: add compat case for setsockopt SO_ATTACH_REUSEPORT_CBPF

2016-06-03 Thread Helge Deller
Commit 538950a1b752 ("soreuseport: setsockopt SO_ATTACH_REUSEPORT_[CE]BPF") missed to add the compat case for the SO_ATTACH_REUSEPORT_CBPF option. Signed-off-by: Helge Deller <del...@gmx.de> diff --git a/net/compat.c b/net/compat.c index 5cfd26a..1373947 100644 --- a/net/co

Re: [PATCH] soreuseport: add compat case for setsockopt SO_ATTACH_REUSEPORT_CBPF

2016-06-03 Thread Helge Deller
On 03.06.2016 20:11, Sergei Shtylyov wrote: > Hello. > > On 06/03/2016 08:18 PM, Helge Deller wrote: > >> Commit 538950a ("soreuseport: setsockopt SO_ATTACH_REUSEPORT_[CE]BPF") > >At least 12 digits must be specified for SHA1. checkpatch.pl should've >

[PATCH] soreuseport: Fix reuseport_bpf testcase on 32bit architectures

2016-06-03 Thread Helge Deller
This fixes the following compiler warnings when compiling the reuseport_bpf testcase on a 32 bit platform: reuseport_bpf.c: In function ‘attach_ebpf’: reuseport_bpf.c:114:15: warning: cast from pointer to integer of ifferent size [-Wpointer-to-int-cast] Signed-off-by: Helge Deller <

[PATCH] soreuseport: add compat case for setsockopt SO_ATTACH_REUSEPORT_CBPF

2016-06-03 Thread Helge Deller
Commit 538950a ("soreuseport: setsockopt SO_ATTACH_REUSEPORT_[CE]BPF") missed to add the compat case for the SO_ATTACH_REUSEPORT_CBPF setsockoption() option. Since both SO_ATTACH_FILTER and SO_ATTACH_REUSEPORT_CBPF use a struct sock_fprog let's combine the handling of both. Signed-off

Re: [PATCH] net: tulip: update MAINTAINER status to Orphan

2015-11-19 Thread Helge Deller
ource tree (for reasons I don't see a need to repeat > here). > >> You could add linux-m...@linux-mips.org if that helps. > > I wanted to let the mips folks decide if they should be listedand > CC'd Helge (parisc maintainer) in case he objected to added > linux-parisc mailing

Re: [GIT PULL] parisc architecture updates for v4.3

2015-11-03 Thread Helge Deller
Hi Linus, On 03.11.2015 22:01, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 4:49 AM, Helge Deller <del...@gmx.de> wrote: >> >> please pull some patches for the parisc architecture for kernel v4.3 from: > > So no way was I going to pull that for 4.3, Yes, since you

Re: CONFIG_XPS depends on L1_CACHE_BYTES being greater than sizeof(struct xps_map)

2015-10-24 Thread Helge Deller
* Alexander Duyck <alexander.du...@gmail.com>: > On 10/23/2015 03:17 PM, Helge Deller wrote: > >On 24.10.2015 00:00, Alexander Duyck wrote: > >>On 10/23/2015 02:08 PM, Helge Deller wrote: > >>>* Eric Dumazet <eric.duma...@gmail.com>: > >>>

Re: CONFIG_XPS depends on L1_CACHE_BYTES being greater than sizeof(struct xps_map)

2015-10-23 Thread Helge Deller
On 22.10.2015 23:37, Tom Herbert wrote: > On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 1:00 PM, Helge Deller <del...@gmx.de> wrote: >> Hi Tom & David, >> >> I've queued-up a patch for the parisc architecture which reduces >> L1_CACHE_BYTES from 32 to 16: >>

Re: CONFIG_XPS depends on L1_CACHE_BYTES being greater than sizeof(struct xps_map)

2015-10-23 Thread Helge Deller
On 22.10.2015 23:50, Eric Dumazet wrote: > On Thu, 2015-10-22 at 22:00 +0200, Helge Deller wrote: >> Hi Tom & David, >> >> I've queued-up a patch for the parisc architecture which reduces >> L1_CACHE_BYTES from 32 to 16: >> https://patchwork.kernel.org

Re: CONFIG_XPS depends on L1_CACHE_BYTES being greater than sizeof(struct xps_map)

2015-10-23 Thread Helge Deller
* Eric Dumazet <eric.duma...@gmail.com>: > On Fri, 2015-10-23 at 21:25 +0200, Helge Deller wrote: > > > Then, how about simply changing it to twice of L1_CACHE_BYTES ? > > > > #define XPS_MIN_MAP_ALLOC ((L1_CACHE_BYTES * 2 - sizeof(struct xps_map)) / > > s

Re: CONFIG_XPS depends on L1_CACHE_BYTES being greater than sizeof(struct xps_map)

2015-10-23 Thread Helge Deller
On 24.10.2015 00:00, Alexander Duyck wrote: > On 10/23/2015 02:08 PM, Helge Deller wrote: >> * Eric Dumazet <eric.duma...@gmail.com>: >>> On Fri, 2015-10-23 at 21:25 +0200, Helge Deller wrote: >>> >>>> Then, how about simply changing it t

Re: CONFIG_XPS depends on L1_CACHE_BYTES being greater than sizeof(struct xps_map)

2015-10-23 Thread Helge Deller
On 23.10.2015 23:08, Helge Deller wrote: > * Eric Dumazet <eric.duma...@gmail.com>: >> On Fri, 2015-10-23 at 21:25 +0200, Helge Deller wrote: >> >>> Then, how about simply changing it to twice of L1_CACHE_BYTES ? >>> >>> #define XPS_MIN_MAP_AL

CONFIG_XPS depends on L1_CACHE_BYTES being greater than sizeof(struct xps_map)

2015-10-22 Thread Helge Deller
Hi Tom & David, I've queued-up a patch for the parisc architecture which reduces L1_CACHE_BYTES from 32 to 16: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/7399291/ But this change will break the kernel build like this: In file included from net/core/dev.c:92:0: net/core/dev.c: In function

Re: [PATCH] Time-based RFC 4122 UUID generator

2007-11-20 Thread Helge Deller
On Tuesday 20 November 2007, Andrew Morton wrote: On Sun, 18 Nov 2007 20:38:21 +0100 Helge Deller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Andrew, could you please consider adding this patch to your 2.6.25 patch series? please cc netdev on networking-related things Ok. This is the third version