it-Project: kernel/release/8xx
> Gerrit-Branch: 816
> Gerrit-Change-Id: Ied39c2f4ef576c697b0064d6b810b47282796388
> Gerrit-Change-Number: 181992
> Gerrit-PatchSet: 1
> Gerrit-Owner: Yuchung Cheng
> Gerrit-Reviewer: Greg Thelen
> Gerrit-Reviewer: Laurent Chavey
> Gerrit-Re
(bond-first_slave).aggregator))) {
if (!netif_carrier_ok(bond-dev)) {
netif_carrier_on(bond-dev);
return 1;
On 5/31/07, Laurent Chavey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
if a host configured with 802.3ad bond mode is connected to a switch
On 6/1/07, Jay Vosburgh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Laurent Chavey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/31/07, Laurent Chavey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
if a host configured with 802.3ad bond mode is connected to a switch
that does not support 802.3ad, then an aggregator is selected as the
active
Remove the requirement to have at least one configured partner to
enable the operation of links. The later is necessary to have the code
in compliance with section 43.3.9 of IEEE 802.3,
Signed-off-by: Laurent Chavey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
diff -ru linux-2.6.21.3/drivers/net/bonding/bond_3ad.c
if a host configured with 802.3ad bond mode is connected to a switch
that does not support 802.3ad, then an aggregator is selected as the
active aggregator (first link that has carrier in the slave list).
This is perfectly fine, since it lets at least one of the link become active.
(this was the
features = features (dev_features BOND_INTERSECT_FEATURES);
On 5/30/07, Michael Buesch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wednesday 30 May 2007 04:47:09 Laurent Chavey wrote:
proposed change.
--- 2.6.20/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c 2007-05-29
19:43:39.010565000 -0700
+++ 2.6.20.fix
)
max_hard_header_len = slave-dev-hard_header_len;
}
On 5/30/07, Laurent Chavey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
features = features (dev_features BOND_INTERSECT_FEATURES);
On 5/30/07, Michael Buesch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wednesday 30 May 2007 04:47:09 Laurent Chavey wrote:
proposed
should we then move/integrate that code as part of the bonding driver ?
On 5/30/07, Stephen Hemminger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 29 May 2007 17:41:45 -0700
Laurent Chavey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
kernel version = 2.6.20.1
file drivers/net/bonding/bonding_main.c
function
kernel version = 2.6.20.1
file drivers/net/bonding/bonding_main.c
function bond_compute_features()
---
Given a system with two different NIC. One driver sets
dev-features |= NETIF_F_HW_CSUM
the other driver sets
dev-features |= NETIF_F_IP_CSUM
when enslaving the 2
)
max_hard_header_len = slave-dev-hard_header_len;
}
On 5/29/07, Laurent Chavey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
kernel version = 2.6.20.1
file drivers/net/bonding/bonding_main.c
function bond_compute_features()
---
Given a system with two different NIC. One driver sets
dev
On 4/23/07, jamal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 2007-23-04 at 16:08 -0700, Laurent Chavey wrote:
sorry for the trick question.
I was simply making a modification to the skb tap code
to allow tcpdump to work on the slave interface and not
just the bonded one.
If you dont mind: what
handle_bridge does call the tap, so my question is answer there.
thanks,
On 4/24/07, Laurent Chavey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 4/23/07, jamal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 2007-23-04 at 16:08 -0700, Laurent Chavey wrote:
sorry for the trick question.
I was simply making
, Chris Leech [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 4/18/07, David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Laurent Chavey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 16:05:27 -0700
When using PF_PACKET socket with bonded interfaces, there is no
way to get the slave interface (physical interface) the packet
if CONFIG_NET_CLS_ACT is not defined, then is the
code below correct ?
netif_receive_skb()
---
list_for_each_entry_rcu(ptype, ptype_all, list) {
if (!ptype-dev || ptype-dev == skb-dev) {
if (pt_prev)
, 2007-23-04 at 14:19 -0700, Laurent Chavey wrote:
if CONFIG_NET_CLS_ACT is not defined, then is the
code below correct ?
The simple answer is yes;
Is something not working for you?
It is hard to read your question my good friend because it comes out
like a trick question;-
It is more useful
When using PF_PACKET socket with bonded interfaces, there is no
way to get the slave interface (physical interface) the packet was
actually received on.
It looks like there isn't a way to pass the original device {see
packet_rcv() in ./net/packet/af_packet.c} to the socket reader.
When an
16 matches
Mail list logo
