From: Daniel Borkmann
Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2017 21:41:33 +0200
> On 10/22/2017 03:09 PM, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
>> On 10/22/2017 02:57 PM, David Miller wrote:
>>>
>>> There were quite a few BPF conflicts during the merge I just did of
>>> 'net' into 'net-next'.
>>>
>>> In
On 10/22/2017 03:09 PM, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
On 10/22/2017 02:57 PM, David Miller wrote:
There were quite a few BPF conflicts during the merge I just did of
'net' into 'net-next'.
In particular, all of the packet pointer branch tests in the verifier
had to be resolved wrt. three different
On 10/22/2017 02:57 PM, David Miller wrote:
There were quite a few BPF conflicts during the merge I just did of
'net' into 'net-next'.
In particular, all of the packet pointer branch tests in the verifier
had to be resolved wrt. three different sets of changes.
The off-by-one stuff. The
There were quite a few BPF conflicts during the merge I just did of
'net' into 'net-next'.
In particular, all of the packet pointer branch tests in the verifier
had to be resolved wrt. three different sets of changes.
The off-by-one stuff. The allowance of the 'data_end > ptr + x' form
of