On 02/12/2018 04:03 PM, David Miller wrote:
From: Eric Dumazet
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2018 13:54:59 -0800
We had project/teams using different routing tables for each vlan they
setup :/
Indeed, people use FIB rules and think they can scale in software. As
currently
On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 8:34 AM, David Miller wrote:
> From: Roopa Prabhu
> Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2018 08:19:35 -0800
>
>> - Regardless of this series, I think we should optimize ip rules or
>> have a new implementation of policy based routing. happy
From: Roopa Prabhu
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2018 08:19:35 -0800
> - Regardless of this series, I think we should optimize ip rules or
> have a new implementation of policy based routing. happy to hear about
> possible options here:
> - optimize the existing
On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 4:03 PM, David Miller wrote:
> From: Eric Dumazet
> Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2018 13:54:59 -0800
>
>> We had project/teams using different routing tables for each vlan they
>> setup :/
>
> Indeed, people use FIB rules and think they
From: Eric Dumazet
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2018 13:54:59 -0800
> We had project/teams using different routing tables for each vlan they
> setup :/
Indeed, people use FIB rules and think they can scale in software. As
currently implemented, they can't.
The example you give
On 2/12/18 2:54 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Mon, 2018-02-12 at 16:05 -0500, David Miller wrote:
>> From: Eric Dumazet
>> Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2018 12:49:33 -0800
>>
>>> Any setup with about 20 rules to be evaluated (per packet cost) will
>>> feel the pain...
>>>
>>> I wonder
On Mon, 2018-02-12 at 16:05 -0500, David Miller wrote:
> From: Eric Dumazet
> Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2018 12:49:33 -0800
>
> > Any setup with about 20 rules to be evaluated (per packet cost) will
> > feel the pain...
> >
> > I wonder if we could JIT/eBPF this thing.
>
>
On 2/12/18 2:05 PM, David Miller wrote:
> From: Eric Dumazet
> Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2018 12:49:33 -0800
>
>> Any setup with about 20 rules to be evaluated (per packet cost) will
>> feel the pain...
>>
>> I wonder if we could JIT/eBPF this thing.
I had the same comments --
From: Eric Dumazet
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2018 12:49:33 -0800
> Any setup with about 20 rules to be evaluated (per packet cost) will
> feel the pain...
>
> I wonder if we could JIT/eBPF this thing.
That's true for the software implementation angle.
But I bet anyone actually
On Sun, 2018-02-11 at 14:26 -0800, Roopa Prabhu wrote:
> From: Roopa Prabhu
>
> Add support to match on src port, dst port and ip protocol.
>
> Signed-off-by: Roopa Prabhu
> ---
> include/uapi/linux/fib_rules.h | 3 +++
>
10 matches
Mail list logo