Re: [1/2] ath9k: ar9002_mac: kill off ACCESS_ONCE()

Mark Rutland wrote: > For several reasons, it is desirable to use {READ,WRITE}_ONCE() in > preference to ACCESS_ONCE(), and new code is expected to use one of the > former. So far, there's been no reason to change most existing uses of > ACCESS_ONCE(), as these aren't

[PATCH 1/2] ath9k: ar9002_mac: kill off ACCESS_ONCE()

For several reasons, it is desirable to use {READ,WRITE}_ONCE() in preference to ACCESS_ONCE(), and new code is expected to use one of the former. So far, there's been no reason to change most existing uses of ACCESS_ONCE(), as these aren't currently harmful. However, for some new features (e.g.