> It seems that this is going to be 100Base-T1 mess while IEEE 802.3bw
> miss Clause 22 updates. Clause 45 is rarely used from my experience. Probably
> IEEE expected 100Base-T1 PHYs to go for Clause 45 MDIO and this did not work
> so far.
Hi Kirill
Thanks for this information. So lets forget
Hi Andrew.
Thanks for your comments. I will update the patch a bit later.
>
> Does 100Base-T1/cause 96 define a way to identify a PHY which
> implements this? I'm just wondering if we can do this in the generic
> code, for devices which correctly implement the standard?
>
Well, I did research
On Fri, Jun 08, 2018 at 05:45:32PM +0300, Kirill Kranke wrote:
> Current generic PHY driver does not work with TJA1100 BroadR-REACH PHY
> properly. TJA1100 does not have any standard ability enabled at MII_BMSR
> register. Instead it has BroadR-REACH ability at MII_ESTATUS enabled, which
> is not
Current generic PHY driver does not work with TJA1100 BroadR-REACH PHY
properly. TJA1100 does not have any standard ability enabled at MII_BMSR
register. Instead it has BroadR-REACH ability at MII_ESTATUS enabled, which
is not handled by generic driver yet. Therefore generic driver is unable to
On Fri, Jun 08, 2018 at 12:56:39PM +0300, Kirill Kranke wrote:
> From: Kirill Kranke
>
> Current generic PHY driver does not work with TJA1100 BroadR-REACH PHY
> properly. TJA1100 does not have any standard ability enabled at MII_BMSR
> register. Instead it has BroadR-REACH ability at
From: Kirill Kranke
Current generic PHY driver does not work with TJA1100 BroadR-REACH PHY
properly. TJA1100 does not have any standard ability enabled at MII_BMSR
register. Instead it has BroadR-REACH ability at MII_ESTATUS enabled, which
is not handled by generic driver yet. Therefore generic
