Re: [PATCH] net: sched: act_connmark: don't zap skb->nfct

2015-04-29 Thread David Miller
From: Florian Westphal Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2015 13:33:21 +0200 > This action is meant to be passive, i.e. we should not alter > skb->nfct: If nfct is present just leave it alone. > > Compile tested only. > > Cc: Jamal Hadi Salim > Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal Applied. -- To unsubscribe from

Re: [PATCH] net: sched: act_connmark: don't zap skb->nfct

2015-04-28 Thread Pablo Neira Ayuso
On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 01:33:21PM +0200, Florian Westphal wrote: > This action is meant to be passive, i.e. we should not alter > skb->nfct: If nfct is present just leave it alone. > > Compile tested only. > > Cc: Jamal Hadi Salim > Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal Acked-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso

[PATCH] net: sched: act_connmark: don't zap skb->nfct

2015-04-28 Thread Florian Westphal
This action is meant to be passive, i.e. we should not alter skb->nfct: If nfct is present just leave it alone. Compile tested only. Cc: Jamal Hadi Salim Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal --- shouldn't matter much in practice since this would be used in the ingress path where skb->nfct is NULL in