On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 01:40:23PM +0200, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 11:34:22AM +0200, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 10:47:54PM +0300, Julian Anastasov wrote:
> > >
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > On Mon, 24 Oct 2016, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > >
> > > >
On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 11:34:22AM +0200, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 10:47:54PM +0300, Julian Anastasov wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > On Mon, 24 Oct 2016, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> >
> > > Building the ip_vs_sync code with CONFIG_OPTIMIZE_INLINING on x86
> > > confuses
On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 10:47:54PM +0300, Julian Anastasov wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> On Mon, 24 Oct 2016, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>
> > Building the ip_vs_sync code with CONFIG_OPTIMIZE_INLINING on x86
> > confuses the compiler to the point where it produces a rather
> > dubious warning message:
From: Arnd Bergmann
> Sent: 24 October 2016 21:22
> On Monday, October 24, 2016 10:47:54 PM CEST Julian Anastasov wrote:
> > > diff --git a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_sync.c
> > > b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_sync.c
> > > index 1b07578bedf3..9350530c16c1 100644
> > > ---
On Monday, October 24, 2016 10:47:54 PM CEST Julian Anastasov wrote:
> > diff --git a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_sync.c
> > b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_sync.c
> > index 1b07578bedf3..9350530c16c1 100644
> > --- a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_sync.c
> > +++ b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_sync.c
> > @@ -283,6
Hello,
On Mon, 24 Oct 2016, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> Building the ip_vs_sync code with CONFIG_OPTIMIZE_INLINING on x86
> confuses the compiler to the point where it produces a rather
> dubious warning message:
>
> net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_sync.c:1073:33: error: ‘opt.init_seq’ may be used
Building the ip_vs_sync code with CONFIG_OPTIMIZE_INLINING on x86
confuses the compiler to the point where it produces a rather
dubious warning message:
net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_sync.c:1073:33: error: ‘opt.init_seq’ may be used
uninitialized in this function [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]