From: Phil Sutter
Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2015 00:37:15 +0200
> After having tested insertion, lookup, table walk and removal, spawn a
> number of threads running operations on the same rhashtable. Each of
> them will:
>
> 1) insert it's own set of objects,
> 2) lookup every successfully inserted obje
On Sun, Aug 16, 2015 at 08:12:35PM +0200, Florian Westphal wrote:
> Phil Sutter wrote:
> > After having tested insertion, lookup, table walk and removal, spawn a
> > number of threads running operations on the same rhashtable. Each of
> > them will:
>
> [..]
>
> > + if (down_interruptible(&sta
Phil Sutter wrote:
> After having tested insertion, lookup, table walk and removal, spawn a
> number of threads running operations on the same rhashtable. Each of
> them will:
[..]
> + if (down_interruptible(&startup_sem))
> + pr_err(" thread[%d]: down_interruptible failed\n", t
On 08/15/15 at 12:37am, Phil Sutter wrote:
> After having tested insertion, lookup, table walk and removal, spawn a
> number of threads running operations on the same rhashtable. Each of
> them will:
>
> 1) insert it's own set of objects,
> 2) lookup every successfully inserted object and finally
After having tested insertion, lookup, table walk and removal, spawn a
number of threads running operations on the same rhashtable. Each of
them will:
1) insert it's own set of objects,
2) lookup every successfully inserted object and finally
3) remove objects in several rounds until all of them h
