Re: [PATCH] smc91x: fix one source of spurious interrupts

2005-11-18 Thread Jeff Garzik
Nicolas Pitre wrote: Not only SMC_ACK_INT(IM_TX_EMPTY_INT) in in smc_hardware_send_pkt) appears to be unnecessary (tested with an SMC91C94 and SMC91C111), but it seems to trigger spurious interrupts on some machines as well. Removed. While at it, let's log any remaining spurious interrupts i

[PATCH] smc91x: fix one source of spurious interrupts

2005-11-17 Thread Nicolas Pitre
Not only SMC_ACK_INT(IM_TX_EMPTY_INT) in in smc_hardware_send_pkt) appears to be unnecessary (tested with an SMC91C94 and SMC91C111), but it seems to trigger spurious interrupts on some machines as well. Removed. While at it, let's log any remaining spurious interrupts if any (and clean usag