Re: [PATCH] xfrm: policy: check policy direction value

2017-08-03 Thread Steffen Klassert
On Wed, Aug 02, 2017 at 07:50:14PM +0200, Vladis Dronov wrote:
> The 'dir' parameter in xfrm_migrate() is a user-controlled byte which is used
> as an array index. This can lead to an out-of-bound access, kernel lockup and
> DoS. Add a check for the 'dir' value.
> 
> This fixes CVE-2017-11600.
> 
> References: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1474928
> Fixes: 80c9abaabf42 ("[XFRM]: Extension for dynamic update of endpoint 
> address(es)")
> Cc:  # v2.6.21-rc1
> Reported-by: "bo Zhang" 
> Signed-off-by: Vladis Dronov 

Applied to the ipsec tree, thanks!



[PATCH] xfrm: policy: check policy direction value

2017-08-02 Thread Vladis Dronov
The 'dir' parameter in xfrm_migrate() is a user-controlled byte which is used
as an array index. This can lead to an out-of-bound access, kernel lockup and
DoS. Add a check for the 'dir' value.

This fixes CVE-2017-11600.

References: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1474928
Fixes: 80c9abaabf42 ("[XFRM]: Extension for dynamic update of endpoint 
address(es)")
Cc:  # v2.6.21-rc1
Reported-by: "bo Zhang" 
Signed-off-by: Vladis Dronov 
---
 net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c | 6 ++
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)

diff --git a/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c b/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c
index ff61d85..6f5a0dad 100644
--- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c
+++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c
@@ -3308,9 +3308,15 @@ int xfrm_migrate(const struct xfrm_selector *sel, u8 
dir, u8 type,
struct xfrm_state *x_new[XFRM_MAX_DEPTH];
struct xfrm_migrate *mp;
 
+   /* Stage 0 - sanity checks */
if ((err = xfrm_migrate_check(m, num_migrate)) < 0)
goto out;
 
+   if (dir >= XFRM_POLICY_MAX) {
+   err = -EINVAL;
+   goto out;
+   }
+
/* Stage 1 - find policy */
if ((pol = xfrm_migrate_policy_find(sel, dir, type, net)) == NULL) {
err = -ENOENT;
-- 
2.9.4