Re: [PATCH 0/2] wireless: Use complete() instead complete_all()

2016-08-18 Thread Luis R. Rodriguez
On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 03:12:04PM +0200, Daniel Wagner wrote: > This series ignores all complete_all() usages in the firmware loading > path. They will be hopefully address by Luis' sysdata patches [0]. > That leaves a couple of complete_all() calls. I had not considered this as a gain, but glad

[PATCH 0/2] wireless: Use complete() instead complete_all()

2016-08-18 Thread Daniel Wagner
From: Daniel Wagner Hi, Using complete_all() is not wrong per se but it suggest that there might be more than one reader. For -rt I am reviewing all complete_all() users and would like to leave only the real ones in the tree. The main problem for -rt about complete_all() is that it can be uses i