On 07/12/2018 11:35 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 11:12:45PM +0200, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
>> On 07/12/2018 11:02 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 09:02:41PM +0200, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
Applied to bpf-next, thanks a lot Russell!
On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 11:12:45PM +0200, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> On 07/12/2018 11:02 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 09:02:41PM +0200, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> >> Applied to bpf-next, thanks a lot Russell!
> >
> > Thanks, I've just sent four more patches, which
On 07/12/2018 11:02 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 09:02:41PM +0200, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
>> Applied to bpf-next, thanks a lot Russell!
>
> Thanks, I've just sent four more patches, which is the sum total of
> what I'm intending to send for BPF improvements for
On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 09:02:41PM +0200, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> Applied to bpf-next, thanks a lot Russell!
Thanks, I've just sent four more patches, which is the sum total of
what I'm intending to send for BPF improvements for the next merge
window.
--
RMK's Patch system:
On 07/11/2018 11:30 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This series improves the ARM BPF JIT compiler by:
> - enumerating the stack layout rather than using constants that happen
> to be multiples of four
> - rejig the BPF "register" accesses to use negative numbers instead of
>
Hi,
This series improves the ARM BPF JIT compiler by:
- enumerating the stack layout rather than using constants that happen
to be multiples of four
- rejig the BPF "register" accesses to use negative numbers instead of
positive, which could be confused with register numbers in the bpf2a32
