Corey Hickey wrote:
Make a new function sfq_q_enqueue() that operates directly on the
queue data. This will be useful for implementing sfq_change() in
a later patch. A pleasant side-effect is reducing most of the
duplicate code in sfq_enqueue() and sfq_requeue().
Similarly, make a new
Patrick McHardy wrote:
Corey Hickey wrote:
Make a new function sfq_q_enqueue() that operates directly on the
queue data. This will be useful for implementing sfq_change() in
a later patch. A pleasant side-effect is reducing most of the
duplicate code in sfq_enqueue() and sfq_requeue().
Corey Hickey wrote:
Patrick McHardy wrote:
-sch-qstats.drops++;
A line in the changelog explaining that this was increased twice
would have been nice.
Certainly; I think I didn't realize, when you originally pointed out the
duplicate incrementing, that it was a bug in the original
Make a new function sfq_q_enqueue() that operates directly on the
queue data. This will be useful for implementing sfq_change() in
a later patch. A pleasant side-effect is reducing most of the
duplicate code in sfq_enqueue() and sfq_requeue().
Similarly, make a new function sfq_q_dequeue().
Make a new function sfq_q_enqueue() that operates directly on the
queue data. This will be useful for implementing sfq_change() in
a later patch. A pleasant side-effect is reducing most of the
duplicate code in sfq_enqueue() and sfq_requeue().
Similarly, make a new function sfq_q_dequeue().
